Document QEMU coding style (v2) (Avi Kivity)
With the help of some Limoncino I noted several aspects of the QEMU coding style, particularly where it differs from the Linux coding style as many contributors work on both projects. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@6976 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
This commit is contained in:
parent
8eca6b1bc7
commit
e68b98dc72
78
CODING_STYLE
Normal file
78
CODING_STYLE
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
||||
Qemu Coding Style
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
1. Whitespace
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace.
|
||||
Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses
|
||||
can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance
|
||||
of approximately fifteen parsecs. Many a flamewar have been fought and
|
||||
lost on this issue.
|
||||
|
||||
QEMU indents are four spaces. Tabs are never used, except in Makefiles
|
||||
where they have been irreversibly coded into the syntax by some moron.
|
||||
Spaces of course are superior to tabs because:
|
||||
|
||||
- You have just one way to specify whitespace, not two. Ambiguity breeds
|
||||
mistakes.
|
||||
- The confusion surrounding 'use tabs to indent, spaces to justify' is gone.
|
||||
- Tab indents push your code to the right, making your screen seriously
|
||||
unbalanced.
|
||||
- Tabs will be rendered incorrectly on editors who are misconfigured not
|
||||
to use tab stops of eight positions.
|
||||
- Tabs are rendered badly in patches, causing off-by-one errors in almost
|
||||
every line.
|
||||
- It is the QEMU coding style.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Line width
|
||||
|
||||
Lines are 80 characters; not longer.
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale:
|
||||
- Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24
|
||||
xterms and use vi in all of them. The best way to punish them is to
|
||||
let them keep doing it.
|
||||
- Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane
|
||||
line length. Eighty is traditional.
|
||||
- It is the QEMU coding style.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Naming
|
||||
|
||||
Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read. Structured
|
||||
type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out. Scalar type
|
||||
names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX
|
||||
uint64_t and family. Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX
|
||||
and is therefore likely to be changed.
|
||||
|
||||
Typedefs are used to eliminate the redundant 'struct' keyword. It is the
|
||||
QEMU coding style.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Block structure
|
||||
|
||||
Every indented statement is braced; even if the block contains just one
|
||||
statement. The opening brace is on the line that contains the control
|
||||
flow statement that introduces the new block; the closing brace is on the
|
||||
same line as the else keyword, or on a line by itself if there is no else
|
||||
keyword. Example:
|
||||
|
||||
if (a == 5) {
|
||||
printf("a was 5.\n");
|
||||
} else if (a == 6) {
|
||||
printf("a was 6.\n");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
printf("a was something else entirely.\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
An exception is the opening brace for a function; for reasons of tradition
|
||||
and clarity it comes on a line by itself:
|
||||
|
||||
void a_function(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
do_something();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces
|
||||
ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed.
|
||||
Furthermore, it is the QEMU coding style.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user