From e59a8cf1eb2196cdaded214ccd1b819c8faad238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:33:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] usb-ehci: remove hack To answer the question in the comment removed by this patch: I think this was needed because several places in the ehci emulation did not check the T bit of link entries correctly and thus might have followed invalid references. See commit 2a5ff735dc1074171a0cbb1dc228d6d6e907f571 Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann --- hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c index 23631a47c9..10a5b15890 100644 --- a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c +++ b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c @@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ #define NB_MAXINTRATE 8 // Max rate at which controller issues ints #define NB_PORTS 6 // Number of downstream ports #define BUFF_SIZE 5*4096 // Max bytes to transfer per transaction -#define MAX_ITERATIONS 20 // Max number of QH before we break the loop #define MAX_QH 100 // Max allowable queue heads in a chain /* Internal periodic / asynchronous schedule state machine states @@ -1931,24 +1930,8 @@ static void ehci_advance_state(EHCIState *ehci, { EHCIQueue *q = NULL; int again; - int iter = 0; do { - if (ehci_get_state(ehci, async) == EST_FETCHQH) { - iter++; - /* if we are roaming a lot of QH without executing a qTD - * something is wrong with the linked list. TO-DO: why is - * this hack needed? - */ - assert(iter < MAX_ITERATIONS); -#if 0 - if (iter > MAX_ITERATIONS) { - DPRINTF("\n*** advance_state: bailing on MAX ITERATIONS***\n"); - ehci_set_state(ehci, async, EST_ACTIVE); - break; - } -#endif - } switch(ehci_get_state(ehci, async)) { case EST_WAITLISTHEAD: again = ehci_state_waitlisthead(ehci, async); @@ -1984,7 +1967,6 @@ static void ehci_advance_state(EHCIState *ehci, break; case EST_EXECUTE: - iter = 0; again = ehci_state_execute(q, async); break;