target/arm: Stop using cpu_F0s for NEON_2RM_VNEG_F

Switch NEON_2RM_VABS_F away from using cpu_F0s.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190613163917.28589-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
This commit is contained in:
Peter Maydell 2019-06-13 17:39:09 +01:00
parent fd8a68cdcf
commit cedcc96fc7

View File

@ -1374,14 +1374,6 @@ static TCGv_ptr get_fpstatus_ptr(int neon)
return statusptr;
}
static inline void gen_vfp_neg(int dp)
{
if (dp)
gen_helper_vfp_negd(cpu_F0d, cpu_F0d);
else
gen_helper_vfp_negs(cpu_F0s, cpu_F0s);
}
#define VFP_GEN_ITOF(name) \
static inline void gen_vfp_##name(int dp, int neon) \
{ \
@ -4189,8 +4181,7 @@ static int neon_2rm_is_float_op(int op)
* what we are asking here is "does the code for this case in
* the Neon for-each-pass loop use cpu_F0s?".
*/
return (op == NEON_2RM_VNEG_F ||
(op >= NEON_2RM_VRINTN && op <= NEON_2RM_VRINTZ) ||
return ((op >= NEON_2RM_VRINTN && op <= NEON_2RM_VRINTZ) ||
op == NEON_2RM_VRINTM ||
(op >= NEON_2RM_VRINTP && op <= NEON_2RM_VCVTMS) ||
op >= NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F);
@ -6761,7 +6752,7 @@ static int disas_neon_data_insn(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
gen_helper_vfp_abss(tmp, tmp);
break;
case NEON_2RM_VNEG_F:
gen_vfp_neg(0);
gen_helper_vfp_negs(tmp, tmp);
break;
case NEON_2RM_VSWP:
tmp2 = neon_load_reg(rd, pass);