block: Always call bdrv_child_check_perm first
bdrv_child_set_perm alone is not very usable because the caller must call bdrv_child_check_perm first. This is already encapsulated conveniently in bdrv_child_try_set_perm, so remove the other prototypes from the header and fix the one wrong caller, block/mirror.c. Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fed414df9d
commit
c1cef67251
11
block.c
11
block.c
@ -1393,6 +1393,11 @@ static int bdrv_fill_options(QDict **options, const char *filename,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int bdrv_child_check_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
|
||||
GSList *ignore_children, Error **errp);
|
||||
static void bdrv_child_abort_perm_update(BdrvChild *c);
|
||||
static void bdrv_child_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check whether permissions on this node can be changed in a way that
|
||||
* @cumulative_perms and @cumulative_shared_perms are the new cumulative
|
||||
@ -1615,7 +1620,7 @@ static int bdrv_check_update_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t new_used_perm,
|
||||
|
||||
/* Needs to be followed by a call to either bdrv_child_set_perm() or
|
||||
* bdrv_child_abort_perm_update(). */
|
||||
int bdrv_child_check_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
|
||||
static int bdrv_child_check_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
|
||||
GSList *ignore_children, Error **errp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
@ -1627,7 +1632,7 @@ int bdrv_child_check_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void bdrv_child_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared)
|
||||
static void bdrv_child_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint64_t cumulative_perms, cumulative_shared_perms;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1639,7 +1644,7 @@ void bdrv_child_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared)
|
||||
bdrv_set_perm(c->bs, cumulative_perms, cumulative_shared_perms);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void bdrv_child_abort_perm_update(BdrvChild *c)
|
||||
static void bdrv_child_abort_perm_update(BdrvChild *c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdrv_abort_perm_update(c->bs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -574,7 +574,8 @@ static void mirror_exit(BlockJob *job, void *opaque)
|
||||
* valid. Also give up permissions on mirror_top_bs->backing, which might
|
||||
* block the removal. */
|
||||
block_job_remove_all_bdrv(job);
|
||||
bdrv_child_set_perm(mirror_top_bs->backing, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL);
|
||||
bdrv_child_try_set_perm(mirror_top_bs->backing, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL,
|
||||
&error_abort);
|
||||
bdrv_replace_node(mirror_top_bs, backing_bs(mirror_top_bs), &error_abort);
|
||||
|
||||
/* We just changed the BDS the job BB refers to (with either or both of the
|
||||
@ -1245,7 +1246,8 @@ fail:
|
||||
block_job_unref(&s->common);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bdrv_child_set_perm(mirror_top_bs->backing, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL);
|
||||
bdrv_child_try_set_perm(mirror_top_bs->backing, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL,
|
||||
&error_abort);
|
||||
bdrv_replace_node(mirror_top_bs, backing_bs(mirror_top_bs), &error_abort);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -889,10 +889,6 @@ BdrvChild *bdrv_root_attach_child(BlockDriverState *child_bs,
|
||||
void *opaque, Error **errp);
|
||||
void bdrv_root_unref_child(BdrvChild *child);
|
||||
|
||||
int bdrv_child_check_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
|
||||
GSList *ignore_children, Error **errp);
|
||||
void bdrv_child_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared);
|
||||
void bdrv_child_abort_perm_update(BdrvChild *c);
|
||||
int bdrv_child_try_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
|
||||
Error **errp);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user