libvhost-user: prevent over-running max RAM slots
When VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_MEM_SLOTS support was added to libvhost-user, no guardrails were added to protect against QEMU attempting to hot-add too many RAM slots to a VM with a libvhost-user based backed attached. This change adds the missing error handling by introducing a check on the number of RAM slots the device has available before proceeding to process the VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG message. Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com> Message-Id: <20220117041050.19718-6-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa3d5483f0
commit
b906a23c33
@ -705,6 +705,14 @@ vu_add_mem_reg(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg) {
|
|||||||
return false;
|
return false;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (dev->nregions == VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS) {
|
||||||
|
close(vmsg->fds[0]);
|
||||||
|
vu_panic(dev, "failing attempt to hot add memory via "
|
||||||
|
"VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG message because the backend has "
|
||||||
|
"no free ram slots available");
|
||||||
|
return false;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* If we are in postcopy mode and we receive a u64 payload with a 0 value
|
* If we are in postcopy mode and we receive a u64 payload with a 0 value
|
||||||
* we know all the postcopy client bases have been received, and we
|
* we know all the postcopy client bases have been received, and we
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user