spapr_numa.c: scrap 'legacy_numa' concept
When first introduced, 'legacy_numa' was a way to refer to guests that either wouldn't be affected by associativity domain calculations, namely the ones with only 1 NUMA node, and pre 5.2 guests that shouldn't be affected by it because it would be an userspace change. Calling these cases 'legacy_numa' was a convenient way to label these cases. We're about to introduce a new NUMA affinity, FORM2, and this concept of 'legacy_numa' is now a bit misleading because, although it is called 'legacy' it is in fact a FORM1 exclusive contraint. This patch removes spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa() and open code the conditions in each caller. While we're at it, move the chunk inside spapr_numa_FORM1_affinity_init() that sets all numa_assoc_array domains with 'node_id' to spapr_numa_define_FORM1_domains(). This chunk was being executed if !pre_5_2_numa_associativity and num_nodes => 1, the same conditions in which spapr_numa_define_FORM1_domains() is called shortly after. Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20210920174947.556324-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d98dbe2a2b
commit
afa3b3c9ee
@ -19,15 +19,6 @@
|
||||
/* Moved from hw/ppc/spapr_pci_nvlink2.c */
|
||||
#define SPAPR_GPU_NUMA_ID (cpu_to_be32(1))
|
||||
|
||||
static bool spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa(SpaprMachineState *spapr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
|
||||
SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
|
||||
|
||||
return smc->pre_5_2_numa_associativity ||
|
||||
machine->numa_state->num_nodes <= 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool spapr_numa_is_symmetrical(MachineState *ms)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int src, dst;
|
||||
@ -97,7 +88,18 @@ static void spapr_numa_define_FORM1_domains(SpaprMachineState *spapr)
|
||||
MachineState *ms = MACHINE(spapr);
|
||||
NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
|
||||
int nb_numa_nodes = ms->numa_state->num_nodes;
|
||||
int src, dst, i;
|
||||
int src, dst, i, j;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Fill all associativity domains of non-zero NUMA nodes with
|
||||
* node_id. This is required because the default value (0) is
|
||||
* considered a match with associativity domains of node 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 1; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
|
||||
for (j = 1; j < MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS; j++) {
|
||||
spapr->numa_assoc_array[i][j] = cpu_to_be32(i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (src = 0; src < nb_numa_nodes; src++) {
|
||||
for (dst = src; dst < nb_numa_nodes; dst++) {
|
||||
@ -164,7 +166,6 @@ static void spapr_numa_FORM1_affinity_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
|
||||
SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
|
||||
int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
|
||||
int i, j, max_nodes_with_gpus;
|
||||
bool using_legacy_numa = spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa(spapr);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For all associativity arrays: first position is the size,
|
||||
@ -178,17 +179,6 @@ static void spapr_numa_FORM1_affinity_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
|
||||
spapr->numa_assoc_array[i][0] = cpu_to_be32(MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS);
|
||||
spapr->numa_assoc_array[i][MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS] = cpu_to_be32(i);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Fill all associativity domains of non-zero NUMA nodes with
|
||||
* node_id. This is required because the default value (0) is
|
||||
* considered a match with associativity domains of node 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!using_legacy_numa && i != 0) {
|
||||
for (j = 1; j < MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS; j++) {
|
||||
spapr->numa_assoc_array[i][j] = cpu_to_be32(i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -214,11 +204,13 @@ static void spapr_numa_FORM1_affinity_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Legacy NUMA guests (pseries-5.1 and older, or guests with only
|
||||
* 1 NUMA node) will not benefit from anything we're going to do
|
||||
* after this point.
|
||||
* Guests pseries-5.1 and older uses zeroed associativity domains,
|
||||
* i.e. no domain definition based on NUMA distance input.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Same thing with guests that have only one NUMA node.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (using_legacy_numa) {
|
||||
if (smc->pre_5_2_numa_associativity ||
|
||||
machine->numa_state->num_nodes <= 1) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -334,7 +326,8 @@ static void spapr_numa_FORM1_write_rtas_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
|
||||
cpu_to_be32(maxdomain)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if (spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa(spapr)) {
|
||||
if (smc->pre_5_2_numa_associativity ||
|
||||
ms->numa_state->num_nodes <= 1) {
|
||||
uint32_t legacy_refpoints[] = {
|
||||
cpu_to_be32(0x4),
|
||||
cpu_to_be32(0x4),
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user