target/riscv: prioritize pmp errors in raise_mmu_exception()
raise_mmu_exception(), as is today, is prioritizing guest page faults by checking first if virt_enabled && !first_stage, and then considering the regular inst/load/store faults. There's no mention in the spec about guest page fault being a higher priority that PMP faults. In fact, privileged spec section 3.7.1 says: "Attempting to fetch an instruction from a PMP region that does not have execute permissions raises an instruction access-fault exception. Attempting to execute a load or load-reserved instruction which accesses a physical address within a PMP region without read permissions raises a load access-fault exception. Attempting to execute a store, store-conditional, or AMO instruction which accesses a physical address within a PMP region without write permissions raises a store access-fault exception." So, in fact, we're doing it wrong - PMP faults should always be thrown, regardless of also being a first or second stage fault. The way riscv_cpu_tlb_fill() and get_physical_address() work is adequate: a TRANSLATE_PMP_FAIL error is immediately reported and reflected in the 'pmp_violation' flag. What we need is to change raise_mmu_exception() to prioritize it. Reported-by: Joseph Chan <jchan@ventanamicro.com> Fixes: 82d53adfbb ("target/riscv/cpu_helper.c: Invalid exception on MMU translation stage") Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com> Message-ID: <20240413105929.7030-1-alexei.filippov@syntacore.com> Cc: qemu-stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com> (cherry picked from commit 68e7c86927afa240fa450578cb3a4f18926153e4) Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3ee5f0e313
commit
ab2d6e7412
@ -1176,28 +1176,30 @@ static void raise_mmu_exception(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong address,
|
||||
|
||||
switch (access_type) {
|
||||
case MMU_INST_FETCH:
|
||||
if (env->virt_enabled && !first_stage) {
|
||||
if (pmp_violation) {
|
||||
cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_INST_ACCESS_FAULT;
|
||||
} else if (env->virt_enabled && !first_stage) {
|
||||
cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_INST_GUEST_PAGE_FAULT;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cs->exception_index = pmp_violation ?
|
||||
RISCV_EXCP_INST_ACCESS_FAULT : RISCV_EXCP_INST_PAGE_FAULT;
|
||||
cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_INST_PAGE_FAULT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case MMU_DATA_LOAD:
|
||||
if (two_stage && !first_stage) {
|
||||
if (pmp_violation) {
|
||||
cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_ACCESS_FAULT;
|
||||
} else if (two_stage && !first_stage) {
|
||||
cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_GUEST_ACCESS_FAULT;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cs->exception_index = pmp_violation ?
|
||||
RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_ACCESS_FAULT : RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT;
|
||||
cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case MMU_DATA_STORE:
|
||||
if (two_stage && !first_stage) {
|
||||
if (pmp_violation) {
|
||||
cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_STORE_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT;
|
||||
} else if (two_stage && !first_stage) {
|
||||
cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_STORE_GUEST_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cs->exception_index = pmp_violation ?
|
||||
RISCV_EXCP_STORE_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT :
|
||||
RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT;
|
||||
cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user