vmdk: Fix comment regarding max l1_size coverage
Commit b0651b8c24
("vmdk: Move l1_size check into vmdk_add_extent")
extended the l1_size check from VMDK4 to VMDK3 but did not update the
default coverage in the moved comment.
The previous vmdk4 calculation:
(512 * 1024 * 1024) * 512(l2 entries) * 65536(grain) = 16PB
The added vmdk3 calculation:
(512 * 1024 * 1024) * 4096(l2 entries) * 512(grain) = 1PB
Adding the calculation of vmdk3 to the comment.
In any case, VMware does not offer virtual disks more than 2TB for
vmdk4/vmdk3 or 64TB for the new undocumented seSparse format which is
not implemented yet in qemu.
Reviewed-by: Karl Heubaum <karl.heubaum@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eyal Moscovici <eyal.moscovici@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Arbel Moshe <arbel.moshe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Eiderman <shmuel.eiderman@oracle.com>
Message-id: 20190620091057.47441-2-shmuel.eiderman@oracle.com
Reviewed-by: yuchenlin <yuchenlin@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ec889eb85
commit
940a2cd5d2
11
block/vmdk.c
11
block/vmdk.c
@ -426,10 +426,15 @@ static int vmdk_add_extent(BlockDriverState *bs,
|
||||
return -EFBIG;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (l1_size > 512 * 1024 * 1024) {
|
||||
/* Although with big capacity and small l1_entry_sectors, we can get a
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Although with big capacity and small l1_entry_sectors, we can get a
|
||||
* big l1_size, we don't want unbounded value to allocate the table.
|
||||
* Limit it to 512M, which is 16PB for default cluster and L2 table
|
||||
* size */
|
||||
* Limit it to 512M, which is:
|
||||
* 16PB - for default "Hosted Sparse Extent" (VMDK4)
|
||||
* cluster size: 64KB, L2 table size: 512 entries
|
||||
* 1PB - for default "ESXi Host Sparse Extent" (VMDK3/vmfsSparse)
|
||||
* cluster size: 512B, L2 table size: 4096 entries
|
||||
*/
|
||||
error_setg(errp, "L1 size too big");
|
||||
return -EFBIG;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user