qcow2: Unaligned zero cluster in handle_alloc()
We should check whether the cluster offset we are about to use is actually valid; that is, whether it is aligned to cluster boundaries. Reported-by: R. Nageswara Sastry <nasastry@in.ibm.com> Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1728643 Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1728657 Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20171110203111.7666-3-mreitz@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
791fff504c
commit
93bbaf03ff
@ -1308,10 +1308,21 @@ static int handle_alloc(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t guest_offset,
|
|||||||
(!*host_offset ||
|
(!*host_offset ||
|
||||||
start_of_cluster(s, *host_offset) == (entry & L2E_OFFSET_MASK)))
|
start_of_cluster(s, *host_offset) == (entry & L2E_OFFSET_MASK)))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
int preallocated_nb_clusters;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (offset_into_cluster(s, entry & L2E_OFFSET_MASK)) {
|
||||||
|
qcow2_signal_corruption(bs, true, -1, -1, "Preallocated zero "
|
||||||
|
"cluster offset %#llx unaligned (guest "
|
||||||
|
"offset: %#" PRIx64 ")",
|
||||||
|
entry & L2E_OFFSET_MASK, guest_offset);
|
||||||
|
ret = -EIO;
|
||||||
|
goto fail;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Try to reuse preallocated zero clusters; contiguous normal clusters
|
/* Try to reuse preallocated zero clusters; contiguous normal clusters
|
||||||
* would be fine, too, but count_cow_clusters() above has limited
|
* would be fine, too, but count_cow_clusters() above has limited
|
||||||
* nb_clusters already to a range of COW clusters */
|
* nb_clusters already to a range of COW clusters */
|
||||||
int preallocated_nb_clusters =
|
preallocated_nb_clusters =
|
||||||
count_contiguous_clusters(nb_clusters, s->cluster_size,
|
count_contiguous_clusters(nb_clusters, s->cluster_size,
|
||||||
&l2_table[l2_index], QCOW_OFLAG_COPIED);
|
&l2_table[l2_index], QCOW_OFLAG_COPIED);
|
||||||
assert(preallocated_nb_clusters > 0);
|
assert(preallocated_nb_clusters > 0);
|
||||||
|
@ -321,6 +321,22 @@ echo '--- Repairing ---'
|
|||||||
# because the image was already marked corrupt by that point
|
# because the image was already marked corrupt by that point
|
||||||
_check_test_img -r all
|
_check_test_img -r all
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
echo
|
||||||
|
echo "=== Writing to an unaligned preallocated zero cluster ==="
|
||||||
|
echo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
_make_test_img 64M
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Allocate the L2 table
|
||||||
|
$QEMU_IO -c "write 0 64k" -c "discard 0 64k" "$TEST_IMG" | _filter_qemu_io
|
||||||
|
# Pretend there is a preallocated zero cluster somewhere inside the
|
||||||
|
# image header
|
||||||
|
poke_file "$TEST_IMG" "$l2_offset" "\x80\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x2a\x01"
|
||||||
|
# Let's write to it!
|
||||||
|
$QEMU_IO -c "write 0 64k" "$TEST_IMG" | _filter_qemu_io
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Can't repair this yet (TODO: We can just deallocate the cluster)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# success, all done
|
# success, all done
|
||||||
echo "*** done"
|
echo "*** done"
|
||||||
rm -f $seq.full
|
rm -f $seq.full
|
||||||
|
@ -307,4 +307,14 @@ The following inconsistencies were found and repaired:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Double checking the fixed image now...
|
Double checking the fixed image now...
|
||||||
No errors were found on the image.
|
No errors were found on the image.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
=== Writing to an unaligned preallocated zero cluster ===
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=67108864
|
||||||
|
wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
|
||||||
|
64 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
|
||||||
|
discard 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
|
||||||
|
64 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
|
||||||
|
qcow2: Marking image as corrupt: Preallocated zero cluster offset 0x2a00 unaligned (guest offset: 0); further corruption events will be suppressed
|
||||||
|
write failed: Input/output error
|
||||||
*** done
|
*** done
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user