ppc/pnv: use a do-while() loop in pnv_phb3_translate_tve()
The 'taddr' variable is left unintialized, being set only inside the "while ((lev--) >= 0)" loop where we get the TCE address. The 'lev' var is an int32_t that is being initiliazed by the GETFIELD() macro, which returns an uint64_t. For a human reader this means that 'lev' will always be positive or zero. But some compilers may beg to differ. 'lev' being an int32_t can in theory be set as negative, and the "while ((lev--) >= 0)" loop might never be reached, and 'taddr' will be left unitialized. This can cause phb3_error() to use 'taddr' uninitialized down below: if ((is_write & !(tce & 2)) || ((!is_write) && !(tce & 1))) { phb3_error(phb, "TCE access fault at 0x%"PRIx64, taddr); A quick way of fixing it is to use a do/while() loop. This will keep the same semanting as the existing while() loop does and the compiler will understand that 'taddr' will be initialized at least once. Suggested-by: Matheus K. Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/573 Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220127122234.842145-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
50c8e11ac0
commit
83d2bea68a
@ -792,7 +792,9 @@ static void pnv_phb3_translate_tve(PnvPhb3DMASpace *ds, hwaddr addr,
|
||||
sh = tbl_shift * lev + tce_shift;
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO: Multi-level untested */
|
||||
while ((lev--) >= 0) {
|
||||
do {
|
||||
lev--;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Grab the TCE address */
|
||||
taddr = base | (((addr >> sh) & ((1ul << tbl_shift) - 1)) << 3);
|
||||
if (dma_memory_read(&address_space_memory, taddr, &tce,
|
||||
@ -813,7 +815,7 @@ static void pnv_phb3_translate_tve(PnvPhb3DMASpace *ds, hwaddr addr,
|
||||
}
|
||||
sh -= tbl_shift;
|
||||
base = tce & ~0xfffull;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while (lev >= 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* We exit the loop with TCE being the final TCE */
|
||||
if ((is_write & !(tce & 2)) || ((!is_write) && !(tce & 1))) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user