lm4549: Fix buffer overflow
Report from smatch: lm4549.c:234 lm4549_write_samples(14) error: buffer overflow 's->buffer' 1024 <= 1024 There must be enough space to add two entries starting with index s->buffer_level, therefore the old check was wrong. [Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> clarifies the nature of the analyser warning: I don't object to making the change to placate the analyser, but I don't think this is actually a buffer overrun. We always add and remove samples from the buffer two at a time, so it's not possible to get here with s->buffer_level == BUFFER_SIZE-1 (which is the only case where the old and new conditions give different answers).] Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5d40097fc0
commit
8139626643
@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ uint32_t lm4549_write_samples(lm4549_state *s, uint32_t left, uint32_t right)
|
||||
This model supports 16-bit playback.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (s->buffer_level >= LM4549_BUFFER_SIZE) {
|
||||
if (s->buffer_level > LM4549_BUFFER_SIZE - 2) {
|
||||
DPRINTF("write_sample Buffer full\n");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user