qapi: Move detection of doc / expression name mismatch
Move the check whether the doc matches the expression name from check_definition_doc() to check_exprs(). This changes the error location from the comment to the expression. Makes sense as the message talks about the expression: "Definition of '%s' follows documentation for '%s'". It's also a step towards getting rid of check_docs(). Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-33-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e7823a2adf
commit
7947016d1c
@ -894,40 +894,52 @@ def check_keys(expr_elem, meta, required, optional=[]):
|
||||
def check_exprs(exprs):
|
||||
global all_names
|
||||
|
||||
# Learn the types and check for valid expression keys
|
||||
# Populate name table with names of built-in types
|
||||
for builtin in builtin_types.keys():
|
||||
all_names[builtin] = 'built-in'
|
||||
|
||||
# Learn the types and check for valid expression keys
|
||||
for expr_elem in exprs:
|
||||
expr = expr_elem['expr']
|
||||
info = expr_elem['info']
|
||||
doc = expr_elem.get('doc')
|
||||
|
||||
if 'doc' not in expr_elem and doc_required:
|
||||
if not doc and doc_required:
|
||||
raise QAPISemError(info,
|
||||
"Expression missing documentation comment")
|
||||
|
||||
if 'enum' in expr:
|
||||
name = expr['enum']
|
||||
check_keys(expr_elem, 'enum', ['data'], ['prefix'])
|
||||
add_enum(expr['enum'], info, expr['data'])
|
||||
add_enum(name, info, expr['data'])
|
||||
elif 'union' in expr:
|
||||
name = expr['union']
|
||||
check_keys(expr_elem, 'union', ['data'],
|
||||
['base', 'discriminator'])
|
||||
add_union(expr, info)
|
||||
elif 'alternate' in expr:
|
||||
name = expr['alternate']
|
||||
check_keys(expr_elem, 'alternate', ['data'])
|
||||
add_name(expr['alternate'], info, 'alternate')
|
||||
add_name(name, info, 'alternate')
|
||||
elif 'struct' in expr:
|
||||
name = expr['struct']
|
||||
check_keys(expr_elem, 'struct', ['data'], ['base'])
|
||||
add_struct(expr, info)
|
||||
elif 'command' in expr:
|
||||
name = expr['command']
|
||||
check_keys(expr_elem, 'command', [],
|
||||
['data', 'returns', 'gen', 'success-response', 'boxed'])
|
||||
add_name(expr['command'], info, 'command')
|
||||
add_name(name, info, 'command')
|
||||
elif 'event' in expr:
|
||||
name = expr['event']
|
||||
check_keys(expr_elem, 'event', [], ['data', 'boxed'])
|
||||
add_name(expr['event'], info, 'event')
|
||||
add_name(name, info, 'event')
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise QAPISemError(expr_elem['info'],
|
||||
"Expression is missing metatype")
|
||||
if doc and doc.symbol != name:
|
||||
raise QAPISemError(info, "Definition of '%s' follows documentation"
|
||||
" for '%s'" % (name, doc.symbol))
|
||||
|
||||
# Try again for hidden UnionKind enum
|
||||
for expr_elem in exprs:
|
||||
@ -977,10 +989,6 @@ def check_definition_doc(doc, expr, info):
|
||||
meta = i
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
name = expr[meta]
|
||||
if doc.symbol != name:
|
||||
raise QAPISemError(info, "Definition of '%s' follows documentation"
|
||||
" for '%s'" % (name, doc.symbol))
|
||||
if doc.has_section('Returns') and 'command' not in expr:
|
||||
raise QAPISemError(info, "'Returns:' is only valid for commands")
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/doc-bad-symbol.json:3: Definition of 'foo' follows documentation for 'food'
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/doc-bad-symbol.json:6: Definition of 'foo' follows documentation for 'food'
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user