target/arm: Don't skip MTE checks for LDRT/STRT at EL0
The LDRT/STRT "unprivileged load/store" instructions behave like
normal ones if executed at EL0. We handle this correctly for
the load/store semantics, but get the MTE checking wrong.
We always look at s->mte_active[is_unpriv] to see whether we should
be doing MTE checks, but in hflags.c when we set the TB flags that
will be used to fill the mte_active[] array we only set the
MTE0_ACTIVE bit if UNPRIV is true (i.e. we are not at EL0).
This means that a LDRT at EL0 will see s->mte_active[1] as 0,
and will not do MTE checks even when MTE is enabled.
To avoid the translate-time code having to do an explicit check on
s->unpriv to see if it is OK to index into the mte_active[] array,
duplicate MTE_ACTIVE into MTE0_ACTIVE when UNPRIV is false.
(This isn't a very serious bug because generally nobody executes
LDRT/STRT at EL0, because they have no use there.)
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20230912140434.1333369-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
(cherry picked from commit 903dbefc2b
)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0cd94e2b6
commit
7329cc1c19
@ -306,6 +306,15 @@ static CPUARMTBFlags rebuild_hflags_a64(CPUARMState *env, int el, int fp_el,
|
||||
&& !(env->pstate & PSTATE_TCO)
|
||||
&& (sctlr & (el == 0 ? SCTLR_TCF0 : SCTLR_TCF))) {
|
||||
DP_TBFLAG_A64(flags, MTE_ACTIVE, 1);
|
||||
if (!EX_TBFLAG_A64(flags, UNPRIV)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In non-unpriv contexts (eg EL0), unpriv load/stores
|
||||
* act like normal ones; duplicate the MTE info to
|
||||
* avoid translate-a64.c having to check UNPRIV to see
|
||||
* whether it is OK to index into MTE_ACTIVE[].
|
||||
*/
|
||||
DP_TBFLAG_A64(flags, MTE0_ACTIVE, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* And again for unprivileged accesses, if required. */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user