block: Pull out bdrv_default_perms_for_cow()
Right now, bdrv_format_default_perms() is used by format parents (generally). We want to switch to a model where most parents use a single BdrvChildClass, which then decides the permissions based on the child role. To do so, we have to split bdrv_format_default_perms() into separate functions for each such role. Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200513110544.176672-17-mreitz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
33f2663bd5
commit
70082db4ef
62
block.c
62
block.c
@ -2468,6 +2468,44 @@ void bdrv_filter_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
|
|||||||
*nshared = (shared & DEFAULT_PERM_PASSTHROUGH) | DEFAULT_PERM_UNCHANGED;
|
*nshared = (shared & DEFAULT_PERM_PASSTHROUGH) | DEFAULT_PERM_UNCHANGED;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static void bdrv_default_perms_for_cow(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
|
||||||
|
const BdrvChildClass *child_class,
|
||||||
|
BdrvChildRole role,
|
||||||
|
BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue,
|
||||||
|
uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
|
||||||
|
uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
assert(child_class == &child_backing ||
|
||||||
|
(child_class == &child_of_bds && (role & BDRV_CHILD_COW)));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* We want consistent read from backing files if the parent needs it.
|
||||||
|
* No other operations are performed on backing files.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
perm &= BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* If the parent can deal with changing data, we're okay with a
|
||||||
|
* writable and resizable backing file.
|
||||||
|
* TODO Require !(perm & BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ), too?
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (shared & BLK_PERM_WRITE) {
|
||||||
|
shared = BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_RESIZE;
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
shared = 0;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
shared |= BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ | BLK_PERM_GRAPH_MOD |
|
||||||
|
BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_INACTIVE) {
|
||||||
|
shared |= BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_RESIZE;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*nperm = perm;
|
||||||
|
*nshared = shared;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
void bdrv_format_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
|
void bdrv_format_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
|
||||||
const BdrvChildClass *child_class,
|
const BdrvChildClass *child_class,
|
||||||
BdrvChildRole role,
|
BdrvChildRole role,
|
||||||
@ -2505,28 +2543,8 @@ void bdrv_format_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
|
|||||||
*nperm = perm;
|
*nperm = perm;
|
||||||
*nshared = shared;
|
*nshared = shared;
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
/* We want consistent read from backing files if the parent needs it.
|
bdrv_default_perms_for_cow(bs, c, child_class, role, reopen_queue,
|
||||||
* No other operations are performed on backing files. */
|
perm, shared, nperm, nshared);
|
||||||
perm &= BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* If the parent can deal with changing data, we're okay with a
|
|
||||||
* writable and resizable backing file. */
|
|
||||||
/* TODO Require !(perm & BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ), too? */
|
|
||||||
if (shared & BLK_PERM_WRITE) {
|
|
||||||
shared = BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_RESIZE;
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
shared = 0;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
shared |= BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ | BLK_PERM_GRAPH_MOD |
|
|
||||||
BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_INACTIVE) {
|
|
||||||
shared |= BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_RESIZE;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*nperm = perm;
|
|
||||||
*nshared = shared;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user