exec: Ensure the only one cpu_index allocation method is used
Make sure that cpu_index auto allocation isn't used in combination with manual cpu_index assignment. And dissallow out of order cpu removal if auto allocation is in use. Target that wishes to support out of order unplug should switch to manual cpu_index assignment. Following patch could be used as an example: (pc: init CPUState->cpu_index with index in possible_cpus[])) Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e87d397e5e
commit
630eb0faf4
7
exec.c
7
exec.c
@ -598,11 +598,14 @@ AddressSpace *cpu_get_address_space(CPUState *cpu, int asidx)
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static bool cpu_index_auto_assigned;
|
||||
|
||||
static int cpu_get_free_index(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CPUState *some_cpu;
|
||||
int cpu_index = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
cpu_index_auto_assigned = true;
|
||||
CPU_FOREACH(some_cpu) {
|
||||
cpu_index++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -620,6 +623,8 @@ void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert(!(cpu_index_auto_assigned && cpu != QTAILQ_LAST(&cpus, CPUTailQ)));
|
||||
|
||||
QTAILQ_REMOVE(&cpus, cpu, node);
|
||||
cpu->node.tqe_prev = NULL;
|
||||
cpu->cpu_index = UNASSIGNED_CPU_INDEX;
|
||||
@ -663,6 +668,8 @@ void cpu_exec_init(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
|
||||
if (cpu->cpu_index == UNASSIGNED_CPU_INDEX) {
|
||||
cpu->cpu_index = cpu_get_free_index();
|
||||
assert(cpu->cpu_index != UNASSIGNED_CPU_INDEX);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert(!cpu_index_auto_assigned);
|
||||
}
|
||||
QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&cpus, cpu, node);
|
||||
cpu_list_unlock();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user