hw/eepro100.c: Use extended TBD only where applicable

Bug fix for segfault when run as i82551 HW:
Use Extended TBD only when HW supports it (i82558 and up).

Added assertions to guard from such buffer overflow
Introduce the MAX_TCB_BYTE_COUNT macro
Allocate buf big enough as HW needs (MAX_ETH_FRAME_SIZE -> MAX_TCB_BYTE_COUNT)

I don't feel 100% OK with the "s->device >= i82558B" condition
since it relies on the numeric (hex) value of those defines, which currently
is correct, but changes (which I don't forsee now) might break it.

Signed-off-by: Naphtali Sprei <nsprei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Naphtali Sprei 2009-08-13 15:01:20 +03:00 committed by Anthony Liguori
parent 06c79f4ebd
commit 3f9cb1c14d

View File

@ -715,8 +715,8 @@ static void eepro100_cu_command(EEPRO100State * s, uint8_t val)
} else {
/* Flexible mode. */
uint8_t tbd_count = 0;
if (!(s->configuration[6] & BIT(4))) {
/* Extended TCB. */
if ((s->device >= i82558B) && !(s->configuration[6] & BIT(4))) {
/* Extended Flexible TCB. */
assert(tcb_bytes == 0);
for (; tbd_count < 2; tbd_count++) {
uint32_t tx_buffer_address = ldl_phys(tbd_address);
@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static void eepro100_cu_command(EEPRO100State * s, uint8_t val)
uint16_t tx_buffer_el = lduw_phys(tbd_address + 6);
tbd_address += 8;
logout
("TBD (extended mode): buffer address 0x%08x, size 0x%04x\n",
("TBD (extended flexible mode): buffer address 0x%08x, size 0x%04x\n",
tx_buffer_address, tx_buffer_size);
cpu_physical_memory_read(tx_buffer_address, &buf[size],
tx_buffer_size);