qcow2-cluster: Fix integer left shift error in qcow2_alloc_cluster_link_l2()
When calculating the offset, the result of left shift operation will be promoted to type int64 automatically because the left operand of + operator is uint64_t. but the result after integer promotion may be produce an error value for us and trigger the following asserting error. For example, consider i=0x2000, cluster_bits=18, the result of left shift operation will be 0x80000000. Cause argument i is of signed integer type, the result is automatically promoted to 0xffffffff80000000 which is not we expected The way to trigger the assertion error: qemu-img create -f qcow2 -o preallocation=full,cluster_size=256k tmpdisk 10G This patch fix it by casting @i to uint64_t before doing left shift operation Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tu.guoyi@h3c.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com> Message-id: 81ba90fe0c014f269621c283269b42ad@h3c.com Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
616dab9afc
commit
348fcc4f7a
@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ int qcow2_alloc_cluster_link_l2(BlockDriverState *bs, QCowL2Meta *m)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
assert(l2_index + m->nb_clusters <= s->l2_slice_size);
|
assert(l2_index + m->nb_clusters <= s->l2_slice_size);
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < m->nb_clusters; i++) {
|
for (i = 0; i < m->nb_clusters; i++) {
|
||||||
uint64_t offset = cluster_offset + (i << s->cluster_bits);
|
uint64_t offset = cluster_offset + ((uint64_t)i << s->cluster_bits);
|
||||||
/* if two concurrent writes happen to the same unallocated cluster
|
/* if two concurrent writes happen to the same unallocated cluster
|
||||||
* each write allocates separate cluster and writes data concurrently.
|
* each write allocates separate cluster and writes data concurrently.
|
||||||
* The first one to complete updates l2 table with pointer to its
|
* The first one to complete updates l2 table with pointer to its
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user