i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level
In the follow-up change, the CPU topology enumeration will be moved to QAPI. And considerring "invalid" should not be exposed to QAPI as an unsettable item, so, as a preparation for future changes, remove "invalid" level from the current CPU topology enumeration structure and define it by a macro instead. Due to the removal of the enumeration of "invalid", bit 0 of CPUX86State.avail_cpu_topo bitmap will no longer correspond to "invalid" level, but will start at the SMT level. Therefore, to honor this change, update the encoding rule for CPUID[0x1F]. Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20241101083331.340178-2-zhao1.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e64c8ef8c
commit
34230ce5a9
@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ typedef struct X86CPUTopoInfo {
|
||||
unsigned threads_per_core;
|
||||
} X86CPUTopoInfo;
|
||||
|
||||
#define CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* CPUTopoLevel is the general i386 topology hierarchical representation,
|
||||
* ordered by increasing hierarchical relationship.
|
||||
@ -69,7 +71,6 @@ typedef struct X86CPUTopoInfo {
|
||||
* or AMD (CPUID[0x80000026]).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
enum CPUTopoLevel {
|
||||
CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID,
|
||||
CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT,
|
||||
CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE,
|
||||
CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MODULE,
|
||||
|
@ -370,20 +370,21 @@ static void encode_topo_cpuid1f(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t count,
|
||||
uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
X86CPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
|
||||
unsigned long level, next_level;
|
||||
unsigned long level, base_level, next_level;
|
||||
uint32_t num_threads_next_level, offset_next_level;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(count + 1 < CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX);
|
||||
assert(count <= CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Find the No.(count + 1) topology level in avail_cpu_topo bitmap.
|
||||
* The search starts from bit 1 (CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID + 1).
|
||||
* The search starts from bit 0 (CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
level = CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID;
|
||||
level = CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT;
|
||||
base_level = level;
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i <= count; i++) {
|
||||
level = find_next_bit(env->avail_cpu_topo,
|
||||
CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE,
|
||||
level + 1);
|
||||
base_level);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* CPUID[0x1f] doesn't explicitly encode the package level,
|
||||
@ -394,6 +395,8 @@ static void encode_topo_cpuid1f(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t count,
|
||||
level = CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Search the next level. */
|
||||
base_level = level + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (level == CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user