qcow2: Make qcow2_alloc_bytes() more explicit
In case of -EAGAIN returned by update_refcount(), we should discard the cluster offset we were trying to allocate and request a new one, because in theory that old offset might now be taken by a refcount block. In practice, this was not the case due to update_refcount() generally returning strictly monotonic increasing cluster offsets. However, this behavior is not set in stone, and it is also not obvious when looking at qcow2_alloc_bytes() alone, so we should not rely on it. Reported-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3efffc3292
commit
2ac01520be
@ -949,11 +949,17 @@ int64_t qcow2_alloc_bytes(BlockDriverState *bs, int size)
|
||||
|
||||
if (!offset || ROUND_UP(offset, s->cluster_size) != new_cluster) {
|
||||
offset = new_cluster;
|
||||
free_in_cluster = s->cluster_size;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
free_in_cluster += s->cluster_size;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert(offset);
|
||||
ret = update_refcount(bs, offset, size, 1, false, QCOW2_DISCARD_NEVER);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
offset = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while (ret == -EAGAIN);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user