vl:c: make sure that sockets are calculated correctly in '-smp X' case
commit
(5cdc9b76e3
vl.c: Remove dead assignment)
removed sockets calculation when 'sockets' weren't provided on CLI
since there wasn't any users for it back then. Exiting checks
are neither reachable
} else if (sockets * cores * threads < cpus) {
or nor triggerable
if (sockets * cores * threads > max_cpus)
so we weren't noticing wrong topology since then, since users
recalculate sockets adhoc on their own.
However with deprecation check it becomes noticable, for example
-smp 2
will start printing warning:
"warning: Invalid CPU topology deprecated: sockets (1) * cores (1) * threads (1) != maxcpus (2)"
calculating sockets if they weren't specified.
Fix it by returning back sockets calculation if it's omitted on CLI.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1536836762-273036-3-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bc1fb850a3
commit
268430be5e
5
vl.c
5
vl.c
@ -1230,11 +1230,14 @@ static void smp_parse(QemuOpts *opts)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
/* compute missing values, prefer sockets over cores over threads */
|
/* compute missing values, prefer sockets over cores over threads */
|
||||||
if (cpus == 0 || sockets == 0) {
|
if (cpus == 0 || sockets == 0) {
|
||||||
sockets = sockets > 0 ? sockets : 1;
|
|
||||||
cores = cores > 0 ? cores : 1;
|
cores = cores > 0 ? cores : 1;
|
||||||
threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
|
threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
|
||||||
if (cpus == 0) {
|
if (cpus == 0) {
|
||||||
|
sockets = sockets > 0 ? sockets : 1;
|
||||||
cpus = cores * threads * sockets;
|
cpus = cores * threads * sockets;
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
max_cpus = qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "maxcpus", cpus);
|
||||||
|
sockets = max_cpus / (cores * threads);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
} else if (cores == 0) {
|
} else if (cores == 0) {
|
||||||
threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
|
threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user