s390x/pci: don't fence interpreted devices without MSI-X

Lack of MSI-X support is not an issue for interpreted passthrough
devices, so let's let these in.  This will allow, for example, ISM
devices to be passed through -- but only when interpretation is
available and being used.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220902172737.170349-5-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Rosato 2022-09-02 13:27:33 -04:00 committed by Thomas Huth
parent dd1d5fd968
commit 15d0e7942d
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -881,6 +881,10 @@ static int s390_pci_msix_init(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
static void s390_pci_msix_free(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
{
if (pbdev->msix.entries == 0) {
return;
}
memory_region_del_subregion(&pbdev->iommu->mr, &pbdev->msix_notify_mr);
object_unparent(OBJECT(&pbdev->msix_notify_mr));
}
@ -1093,7 +1097,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
pbdev->interp = false;
}
if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev)) {
if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev) && !pbdev->interp) {
error_setg(errp, "MSI-X support is mandatory "
"in the S390 architecture");
return;