ahci: ncq sector count correction
This value should not be size-corrected, 0 sectors does not imply 1 sector(s). This is just debug information, but it's misleading! Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Message-id: 1435016308-6150-8-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
5d5f89212f
commit
0437d32ae2
@ -1043,14 +1043,14 @@ static void process_ncq_command(AHCIState *s, int port, uint8_t *cmd_fis,
|
||||
|
||||
DPRINTF(port, "NCQ transfer LBA from %"PRId64" to %"PRId64", "
|
||||
"drive max %"PRId64"\n",
|
||||
ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->lba + ncq_tfs->sector_count - 2,
|
||||
ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->lba + ncq_tfs->sector_count - 1,
|
||||
ide_state->nb_sectors - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
switch(ncq_fis->command) {
|
||||
case READ_FPDMA_QUEUED:
|
||||
DPRINTF(port, "NCQ reading %d sectors from LBA %"PRId64", "
|
||||
"tag %d\n",
|
||||
ncq_tfs->sector_count-1, ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->tag);
|
||||
ncq_tfs->sector_count, ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->tag);
|
||||
|
||||
DPRINTF(port, "tag %d aio read %"PRId64"\n",
|
||||
ncq_tfs->tag, ncq_tfs->lba);
|
||||
@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ static void process_ncq_command(AHCIState *s, int port, uint8_t *cmd_fis,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case WRITE_FPDMA_QUEUED:
|
||||
DPRINTF(port, "NCQ writing %d sectors to LBA %"PRId64", tag %d\n",
|
||||
ncq_tfs->sector_count-1, ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->tag);
|
||||
ncq_tfs->sector_count, ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->tag);
|
||||
|
||||
DPRINTF(port, "tag %d aio write %"PRId64"\n",
|
||||
ncq_tfs->tag, ncq_tfs->lba);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user