rtc: Only call rtc_set_cmos when Register B SET flag is disabled.
This bug occurs when the SET flag of Register B is enabled. When an RTC data register (i.e. any of the ten time/calender CMOS bytes) is set, the data is (as expected) correctly stored in the cmos_data array. However, since the SET flag is enabled, the function rtc_set_time is not invoked. As a result, the field base_rtc in RTCState remains uninitialized. This causes a problem on subsequent writes which can end up overwriting data. To see this, consider writing data to Register A after having written data to any of the RTC data registers; the following figure illustrates the call stack for the Register A write operation: +- cmos_io_port_write +-- check_update_timer +---- get_next_alarm +------ rtc_update_time In rtc_update_time, get_guest_rtc calculates the wrong time and overwrites the previously written RTC data register values. Signed-off-by: Alex Horn <alex.horn@cs.ox.ac.uk> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
03a36f17d7
commit
02c6ccc6dd
@ -570,7 +570,11 @@ static void rtc_update_time(RTCState *s)
|
||||
guest_nsec = get_guest_rtc_ns(s);
|
||||
guest_sec = guest_nsec / NSEC_PER_SEC;
|
||||
gmtime_r(&guest_sec, &ret);
|
||||
rtc_set_cmos(s, &ret);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Is SET flag of Register B disabled? */
|
||||
if ((s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_B] & REG_B_SET) == 0) {
|
||||
rtc_set_cmos(s, &ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int update_in_progress(RTCState *s)
|
||||
|
@ -327,6 +327,45 @@ static void fuzz_registers(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void register_b_set_flag(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Enable binary-coded decimal (BCD) mode and SET flag in Register B*/
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_REG_B, (cmos_read(RTC_REG_B) & ~REG_B_DM) | REG_B_SET);
|
||||
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_REG_A, 0x76);
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_YEAR, 0x11);
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_CENTURY, 0x20);
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_MONTH, 0x02);
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_DAY_OF_MONTH, 0x02);
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_HOURS, 0x02);
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_MINUTES, 0x04);
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_SECONDS, 0x58);
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_REG_A, 0x26);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Since SET flag is still enabled, these are equality checks. */
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_HOURS), ==, 0x02);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_MINUTES), ==, 0x04);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_SECONDS), ==, 0x58);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_DAY_OF_MONTH), ==, 0x02);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_MONTH), ==, 0x02);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_YEAR), ==, 0x11);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_CENTURY), ==, 0x20);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Disable SET flag in Register B */
|
||||
cmos_write(RTC_REG_B, cmos_read(RTC_REG_B) & ~REG_B_SET);
|
||||
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_HOURS), ==, 0x02);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_MINUTES), ==, 0x04);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Since SET flag is disabled, this is an inequality check.
|
||||
* We (reasonably) assume that no (sexagesimal) overflow occurs. */
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_SECONDS), >=, 0x58);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_DAY_OF_MONTH), ==, 0x02);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_MONTH), ==, 0x02);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_YEAR), ==, 0x11);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(cmos_read(RTC_CENTURY), ==, 0x20);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int main(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
QTestState *s = NULL;
|
||||
@ -342,6 +381,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
qtest_add_func("/rtc/alarm-time", alarm_time);
|
||||
qtest_add_func("/rtc/set-year/20xx", set_year_20xx);
|
||||
qtest_add_func("/rtc/set-year/1980", set_year_1980);
|
||||
qtest_add_func("/rtc/register_b_set_flag", register_b_set_flag);
|
||||
qtest_add_func("/rtc/fuzz-registers", fuzz_registers);
|
||||
ret = g_test_run();
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user