pci/shpc: shpc_slot_command(): handle PWRONLY -> ENABLED transition

ENABLED -> PWRONLY transition is not allowed and we handle it by
shpc_invalid_command(). But PWRONLY -> ENABLED transition is silently
ignored, which seems wrong. Let's handle it as correct.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20230216180356.156832-4-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 2023-02-16 21:03:41 +03:00 committed by Michael S. Tsirkin
parent 94c84780ce
commit 025e2088db

View File

@ -273,28 +273,22 @@ static void shpc_slot_command(SHPCDevice *shpc, uint8_t target,
return;
}
switch (power) {
case SHPC_LED_NO:
break;
default:
if (power != SHPC_LED_NO) {
/* TODO: send event to monitor */
shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, power, SHPC_SLOT_PWR_LED_MASK);
}
switch (attn) {
case SHPC_LED_NO:
break;
default:
if (attn != SHPC_LED_NO) {
/* TODO: send event to monitor */
shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, attn, SHPC_SLOT_ATTN_LED_MASK);
}
if (state != SHPC_STATE_NO) {
shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, state, SHPC_SLOT_STATE_MASK);
}
if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED && state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) ||
(current_state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED && state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED)) {
shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, state, SHPC_SLOT_STATE_MASK);
} else if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED ||
current_state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) &&
state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED) {
shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, state, SHPC_SLOT_STATE_MASK);
if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED ||
current_state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) &&
state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED)
{
power = shpc_get_status(shpc, slot, SHPC_SLOT_PWR_LED_MASK);
/* TODO: track what monitor requested. */
/* Look at LED to figure out whether it's ok to remove the device. */