dma/pl330: Fix misleading type
This type really should just be a regular int as no usages rely on it's 32 bitness (it's only meaningful as a bit position and not a bit mask). This also fixes a printf which uses the variable with a regular %d. Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-id: 2a99d31f377aee371476d9da8fd0d1b7efa30f63.1393372019.git.peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
63a31905cb
commit
024c6e2ea5
@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ static void pl330_iomem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
|
||||
uint64_t value, unsigned size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
PL330State *s = (PL330State *) opaque;
|
||||
uint32_t i;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
DB_PRINT("addr: %08x data: %08x\n", (unsigned)offset, (unsigned)value);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user