qemu/qapi/string-input-visitor.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

415 lines
10 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* String parsing visitor
*
* Copyright Red Hat, Inc. 2012-2016
*
* Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
* David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
*
* This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.1 or later.
* See the COPYING.LIB file in the top-level directory.
*/
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
2016-03-14 11:01:28 +03:00
#include "qapi/error.h"
#include "qapi/string-input-visitor.h"
#include "qapi/visitor-impl.h"
#include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
#include "qapi/qmp/qnull.h"
#include "qemu/option.h"
#include "qemu/cutils.h"
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
typedef enum ListMode {
/* no list parsing active / no list expected */
LM_NONE,
/* we have an unparsed string remaining */
LM_UNPARSED,
/* we have an unfinished int64 range */
LM_INT64_RANGE,
/* we have an unfinished uint64 range */
LM_UINT64_RANGE,
/* we have parsed the string completely and no range is remaining */
LM_END,
} ListMode;
/* protect against DOS attacks, limit the amount of elements per range */
#define RANGE_MAX_ELEMENTS 65536
typedef union RangeElement {
int64_t i64;
uint64_t u64;
} RangeElement;
struct StringInputVisitor
{
Visitor visitor;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
/* List parsing state */
ListMode lm;
RangeElement rangeNext;
RangeElement rangeEnd;
const char *unparsed_string;
void *list;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
/* The original string to parse */
const char *string;
};
static StringInputVisitor *to_siv(Visitor *v)
{
return container_of(v, StringInputVisitor, visitor);
}
static bool start_list(Visitor *v, const char *name, GenericList **list,
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
size_t size, Error **errp)
{
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
assert(siv->lm == LM_NONE);
2016-06-09 19:48:34 +03:00
siv->list = list;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
siv->unparsed_string = siv->string;
qapi: Simplify semantics of visit_next_list() The semantics of the list visit are somewhat baroque, with the following pseudocode when FooList is used: start() for (prev = head; cur = next(prev); prev = &cur) { visit(&cur->value) } Note that these semantics (advance before visit) requires that the first call to next() return the list head, while all other calls return the next element of the list; that is, every visitor implementation is required to track extra state to decide whether to return the input as-is, or to advance. It also requires an argument of 'GenericList **' to next(), solely because the first iteration might need to modify the caller's GenericList head, so that all other calls have to do a layer of dereferencing. Thankfully, we only have two uses of list visits in the entire code base: one in spapr_drc (which completely avoids visit_next_list(), feeding in integers from a different source than uint8List), and one in qapi-visit.py. That is, all other list visitors are generated in qapi-visit.c, and share the same paradigm based on a qapi FooList type, so we can refactor how lists are laid out with minimal churn among clients. We can greatly simplify things by hoisting the special case into the start() routine, and flipping the order in the loop to visit before advance: start(head) for (tail = *head; tail; tail = next(tail)) { visit(&tail->value) } With the simpler semantics, visitors have less state to track, the argument to next() is reduced to 'GenericList *', and it also becomes obvious whether an input visitor is allocating a FooList during visit_start_list() (rather than the old way of not knowing if an allocation happened until the first visit_next_list()). As a minor drawback, we now allocate in two functions instead of one, and have to pass the size to both functions (unless we were to tweak the input visitors to cache the size to start_list for reuse during next_list, but that defeats the goal of less visitor state). The signature of visit_start_list() is chosen to match visit_start_struct(), with the new parameters after 'name'. The spapr_drc case is a virtual visit, done by passing NULL for list, similarly to how NULL is passed to visit_start_struct() when a qapi type is not used in those visits. It was easy to provide these semantics for qmp-output and dealloc visitors, and a bit harder for qmp-input (several prerequisite patches refactored things to make this patch straightforward). But it turned out that the string and opts visitors munge enough other state during visit_next_list() to make it easier to just document and require a GenericList visit for now; an assertion will remind us to adjust things if we need the semantics in the future. Several pre-requisite cleanup patches made the reshuffling of the various visitors easier; particularly the qmp input visitor. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-04-29 00:45:31 +03:00
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
if (!siv->string[0]) {
if (list) {
*list = NULL;
}
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
siv->lm = LM_END;
qapi: Simplify semantics of visit_next_list() The semantics of the list visit are somewhat baroque, with the following pseudocode when FooList is used: start() for (prev = head; cur = next(prev); prev = &cur) { visit(&cur->value) } Note that these semantics (advance before visit) requires that the first call to next() return the list head, while all other calls return the next element of the list; that is, every visitor implementation is required to track extra state to decide whether to return the input as-is, or to advance. It also requires an argument of 'GenericList **' to next(), solely because the first iteration might need to modify the caller's GenericList head, so that all other calls have to do a layer of dereferencing. Thankfully, we only have two uses of list visits in the entire code base: one in spapr_drc (which completely avoids visit_next_list(), feeding in integers from a different source than uint8List), and one in qapi-visit.py. That is, all other list visitors are generated in qapi-visit.c, and share the same paradigm based on a qapi FooList type, so we can refactor how lists are laid out with minimal churn among clients. We can greatly simplify things by hoisting the special case into the start() routine, and flipping the order in the loop to visit before advance: start(head) for (tail = *head; tail; tail = next(tail)) { visit(&tail->value) } With the simpler semantics, visitors have less state to track, the argument to next() is reduced to 'GenericList *', and it also becomes obvious whether an input visitor is allocating a FooList during visit_start_list() (rather than the old way of not knowing if an allocation happened until the first visit_next_list()). As a minor drawback, we now allocate in two functions instead of one, and have to pass the size to both functions (unless we were to tweak the input visitors to cache the size to start_list for reuse during next_list, but that defeats the goal of less visitor state). The signature of visit_start_list() is chosen to match visit_start_struct(), with the new parameters after 'name'. The spapr_drc case is a virtual visit, done by passing NULL for list, similarly to how NULL is passed to visit_start_struct() when a qapi type is not used in those visits. It was easy to provide these semantics for qmp-output and dealloc visitors, and a bit harder for qmp-input (several prerequisite patches refactored things to make this patch straightforward). But it turned out that the string and opts visitors munge enough other state during visit_next_list() to make it easier to just document and require a GenericList visit for now; an assertion will remind us to adjust things if we need the semantics in the future. Several pre-requisite cleanup patches made the reshuffling of the various visitors easier; particularly the qmp input visitor. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-04-29 00:45:31 +03:00
} else {
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
if (list) {
*list = g_malloc0(size);
}
siv->lm = LM_UNPARSED;
}
return true;
}
qapi: Simplify semantics of visit_next_list() The semantics of the list visit are somewhat baroque, with the following pseudocode when FooList is used: start() for (prev = head; cur = next(prev); prev = &cur) { visit(&cur->value) } Note that these semantics (advance before visit) requires that the first call to next() return the list head, while all other calls return the next element of the list; that is, every visitor implementation is required to track extra state to decide whether to return the input as-is, or to advance. It also requires an argument of 'GenericList **' to next(), solely because the first iteration might need to modify the caller's GenericList head, so that all other calls have to do a layer of dereferencing. Thankfully, we only have two uses of list visits in the entire code base: one in spapr_drc (which completely avoids visit_next_list(), feeding in integers from a different source than uint8List), and one in qapi-visit.py. That is, all other list visitors are generated in qapi-visit.c, and share the same paradigm based on a qapi FooList type, so we can refactor how lists are laid out with minimal churn among clients. We can greatly simplify things by hoisting the special case into the start() routine, and flipping the order in the loop to visit before advance: start(head) for (tail = *head; tail; tail = next(tail)) { visit(&tail->value) } With the simpler semantics, visitors have less state to track, the argument to next() is reduced to 'GenericList *', and it also becomes obvious whether an input visitor is allocating a FooList during visit_start_list() (rather than the old way of not knowing if an allocation happened until the first visit_next_list()). As a minor drawback, we now allocate in two functions instead of one, and have to pass the size to both functions (unless we were to tweak the input visitors to cache the size to start_list for reuse during next_list, but that defeats the goal of less visitor state). The signature of visit_start_list() is chosen to match visit_start_struct(), with the new parameters after 'name'. The spapr_drc case is a virtual visit, done by passing NULL for list, similarly to how NULL is passed to visit_start_struct() when a qapi type is not used in those visits. It was easy to provide these semantics for qmp-output and dealloc visitors, and a bit harder for qmp-input (several prerequisite patches refactored things to make this patch straightforward). But it turned out that the string and opts visitors munge enough other state during visit_next_list() to make it easier to just document and require a GenericList visit for now; an assertion will remind us to adjust things if we need the semantics in the future. Several pre-requisite cleanup patches made the reshuffling of the various visitors easier; particularly the qmp input visitor. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-04-29 00:45:31 +03:00
static GenericList *next_list(Visitor *v, GenericList *tail, size_t size)
{
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
switch (siv->lm) {
case LM_END:
return NULL;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
case LM_INT64_RANGE:
case LM_UINT64_RANGE:
case LM_UNPARSED:
/* we have an unparsed string or something left in a range */
break;
default:
abort();
}
qapi: Simplify semantics of visit_next_list() The semantics of the list visit are somewhat baroque, with the following pseudocode when FooList is used: start() for (prev = head; cur = next(prev); prev = &cur) { visit(&cur->value) } Note that these semantics (advance before visit) requires that the first call to next() return the list head, while all other calls return the next element of the list; that is, every visitor implementation is required to track extra state to decide whether to return the input as-is, or to advance. It also requires an argument of 'GenericList **' to next(), solely because the first iteration might need to modify the caller's GenericList head, so that all other calls have to do a layer of dereferencing. Thankfully, we only have two uses of list visits in the entire code base: one in spapr_drc (which completely avoids visit_next_list(), feeding in integers from a different source than uint8List), and one in qapi-visit.py. That is, all other list visitors are generated in qapi-visit.c, and share the same paradigm based on a qapi FooList type, so we can refactor how lists are laid out with minimal churn among clients. We can greatly simplify things by hoisting the special case into the start() routine, and flipping the order in the loop to visit before advance: start(head) for (tail = *head; tail; tail = next(tail)) { visit(&tail->value) } With the simpler semantics, visitors have less state to track, the argument to next() is reduced to 'GenericList *', and it also becomes obvious whether an input visitor is allocating a FooList during visit_start_list() (rather than the old way of not knowing if an allocation happened until the first visit_next_list()). As a minor drawback, we now allocate in two functions instead of one, and have to pass the size to both functions (unless we were to tweak the input visitors to cache the size to start_list for reuse during next_list, but that defeats the goal of less visitor state). The signature of visit_start_list() is chosen to match visit_start_struct(), with the new parameters after 'name'. The spapr_drc case is a virtual visit, done by passing NULL for list, similarly to how NULL is passed to visit_start_struct() when a qapi type is not used in those visits. It was easy to provide these semantics for qmp-output and dealloc visitors, and a bit harder for qmp-input (several prerequisite patches refactored things to make this patch straightforward). But it turned out that the string and opts visitors munge enough other state during visit_next_list() to make it easier to just document and require a GenericList visit for now; an assertion will remind us to adjust things if we need the semantics in the future. Several pre-requisite cleanup patches made the reshuffling of the various visitors easier; particularly the qmp input visitor. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-04-29 00:45:31 +03:00
tail->next = g_malloc0(size);
return tail->next;
}
static bool check_list(Visitor *v, Error **errp)
{
const StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
switch (siv->lm) {
case LM_INT64_RANGE:
case LM_UINT64_RANGE:
case LM_UNPARSED:
error_setg(errp, "Fewer list elements expected");
return false;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
case LM_END:
return true;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
default:
abort();
}
}
2016-06-09 19:48:34 +03:00
static void end_list(Visitor *v, void **obj)
{
2016-06-09 19:48:34 +03:00
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
assert(siv->lm != LM_NONE);
2016-06-09 19:48:34 +03:00
assert(siv->list == obj);
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
siv->list = NULL;
siv->unparsed_string = NULL;
siv->lm = LM_NONE;
}
static int try_parse_int64_list_entry(StringInputVisitor *siv, int64_t *obj)
{
const char *endptr;
int64_t start, end;
/* parse a simple int64 or range */
if (qemu_strtoi64(siv->unparsed_string, &endptr, 0, &start)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
end = start;
switch (endptr[0]) {
case '\0':
siv->unparsed_string = endptr;
break;
case ',':
siv->unparsed_string = endptr + 1;
break;
case '-':
/* parse the end of the range */
if (qemu_strtoi64(endptr + 1, &endptr, 0, &end)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
if (start > end || end - start >= RANGE_MAX_ELEMENTS) {
return -EINVAL;
}
switch (endptr[0]) {
case '\0':
siv->unparsed_string = endptr;
break;
case ',':
siv->unparsed_string = endptr + 1;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
/* we have a proper range (with maybe only one element) */
siv->lm = LM_INT64_RANGE;
siv->rangeNext.i64 = start;
siv->rangeEnd.i64 = end;
return 0;
}
static bool parse_type_int64(Visitor *v, const char *name, int64_t *obj,
Error **errp)
{
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
int64_t val;
switch (siv->lm) {
case LM_NONE:
/* just parse a simple int64, bail out if not completely consumed */
if (qemu_strtoi64(siv->string, NULL, 0, &val)) {
error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE,
name ? name : "null", "int64");
return false;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
}
*obj = val;
return true;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
case LM_UNPARSED:
if (try_parse_int64_list_entry(siv, obj)) {
error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE, name ? name : "null",
"list of int64 values or ranges");
return false;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
}
assert(siv->lm == LM_INT64_RANGE);
/* fall through */
case LM_INT64_RANGE:
/* return the next element in the range */
assert(siv->rangeNext.i64 <= siv->rangeEnd.i64);
*obj = siv->rangeNext.i64++;
if (siv->rangeNext.i64 > siv->rangeEnd.i64 || *obj == INT64_MAX) {
/* end of range, check if there is more to parse */
siv->lm = siv->unparsed_string[0] ? LM_UNPARSED : LM_END;
}
return true;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
case LM_END:
error_setg(errp, "Fewer list elements expected");
return false;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
default:
abort();
}
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
}
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
static int try_parse_uint64_list_entry(StringInputVisitor *siv, uint64_t *obj)
{
const char *endptr;
uint64_t start, end;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
/* parse a simple uint64 or range */
if (qemu_strtou64(siv->unparsed_string, &endptr, 0, &start)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
end = start;
switch (endptr[0]) {
case '\0':
siv->unparsed_string = endptr;
break;
case ',':
siv->unparsed_string = endptr + 1;
break;
case '-':
/* parse the end of the range */
if (qemu_strtou64(endptr + 1, &endptr, 0, &end)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
if (start > end || end - start >= RANGE_MAX_ELEMENTS) {
return -EINVAL;
}
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
switch (endptr[0]) {
case '\0':
siv->unparsed_string = endptr;
break;
case ',':
siv->unparsed_string = endptr + 1;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
/* we have a proper range (with maybe only one element) */
siv->lm = LM_UINT64_RANGE;
siv->rangeNext.u64 = start;
siv->rangeEnd.u64 = end;
return 0;
}
static bool parse_type_uint64(Visitor *v, const char *name, uint64_t *obj,
Error **errp)
{
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
uint64_t val;
switch (siv->lm) {
case LM_NONE:
/* just parse a simple uint64, bail out if not completely consumed */
if (qemu_strtou64(siv->string, NULL, 0, &val)) {
error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE, name ? name : "null",
"uint64");
return false;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
}
*obj = val;
return true;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
case LM_UNPARSED:
if (try_parse_uint64_list_entry(siv, obj)) {
error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE, name ? name : "null",
"list of uint64 values or ranges");
return false;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
}
assert(siv->lm == LM_UINT64_RANGE);
/* fall through */
case LM_UINT64_RANGE:
/* return the next element in the range */
assert(siv->rangeNext.u64 <= siv->rangeEnd.u64);
*obj = siv->rangeNext.u64++;
if (siv->rangeNext.u64 > siv->rangeEnd.u64 || *obj == UINT64_MAX) {
/* end of range, check if there is more to parse */
siv->lm = siv->unparsed_string[0] ? LM_UNPARSED : LM_END;
}
return true;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
case LM_END:
error_setg(errp, "Fewer list elements expected");
return false;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
default:
abort();
}
}
static bool parse_type_size(Visitor *v, const char *name, uint64_t *obj,
Error **errp)
{
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
uint64_t val;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
assert(siv->lm == LM_NONE);
error: Eliminate error_propagate() with Coccinelle, part 1 When all we do with an Error we receive into a local variable is propagating to somewhere else, we can just as well receive it there right away. Convert if (!foo(..., &err)) { ... error_propagate(errp, err); ... return ... } to if (!foo(..., errp)) { ... ... return ... } where nothing else needs @err. Coccinelle script: @rule1 forall@ identifier fun, err, errp, lbl; expression list args, args2; binary operator op; constant c1, c2; symbol false; @@ if ( ( - fun(args, &err, args2) + fun(args, errp, args2) | - !fun(args, &err, args2) + !fun(args, errp, args2) | - fun(args, &err, args2) op c1 + fun(args, errp, args2) op c1 ) ) { ... when != err when != lbl: when strict - error_propagate(errp, err); ... when != err ( return; | return c2; | return false; ) } @rule2 forall@ identifier fun, err, errp, lbl; expression list args, args2; expression var; binary operator op; constant c1, c2; symbol false; @@ - var = fun(args, &err, args2); + var = fun(args, errp, args2); ... when != err if ( ( var | !var | var op c1 ) ) { ... when != err when != lbl: when strict - error_propagate(errp, err); ... when != err ( return; | return c2; | return false; | return var; ) } @depends on rule1 || rule2@ identifier err; @@ - Error *err = NULL; ... when != err Not exactly elegant, I'm afraid. The "when != lbl:" is necessary to avoid transforming if (fun(args, &err)) { goto out } ... out: error_propagate(errp, err); even though other paths to label out still need the error_propagate(). For an actual example, see sclp_realize(). Without the "when strict", Coccinelle transforms vfio_msix_setup(), incorrectly. I don't know what exactly "when strict" does, only that it helps here. The match of return is narrower than what I want, but I can't figure out how to express "return where the operand doesn't use @err". For an example where it's too narrow, see vfio_intx_enable(). Silently fails to convert hw/arm/armsse.c, because Coccinelle gets confused by ARMSSE being used both as typedef and function-like macro there. Converted manually. Line breaks tidied up manually. One nested declaration of @local_err deleted manually. Preexisting unwanted blank line dropped in hw/riscv/sifive_e.c. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200707160613.848843-35-armbru@redhat.com>
2020-07-07 19:06:02 +03:00
if (!parse_option_size(name, siv->string, &val, errp)) {
return false;
}
*obj = val;
return true;
}
static bool parse_type_bool(Visitor *v, const char *name, bool *obj,
Error **errp)
{
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
assert(siv->lm == LM_NONE);
return qapi_bool_parse(name ? name : "null", siv->string, obj, errp);
}
static bool parse_type_str(Visitor *v, const char *name, char **obj,
Error **errp)
{
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
assert(siv->lm == LM_NONE);
*obj = g_strdup(siv->string);
return true;
}
static bool parse_type_number(Visitor *v, const char *name, double *obj,
Error **errp)
{
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
double val;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
assert(siv->lm == LM_NONE);
if (qemu_strtod_finite(siv->string, NULL, &val)) {
error_setg(errp, "Invalid parameter type for '%s', expected: number",
name ? name : "null");
return false;
}
*obj = val;
return true;
}
static bool parse_type_null(Visitor *v, const char *name, QNull **obj,
Error **errp)
{
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
assert(siv->lm == LM_NONE);
*obj = NULL;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
if (siv->string[0]) {
error_setg(errp, "Invalid parameter type for '%s', expected: null",
name ? name : "null");
return false;
}
*obj = qnull();
return true;
}
static void string_input_free(Visitor *v)
{
StringInputVisitor *siv = to_siv(v);
g_free(siv);
}
Visitor *string_input_visitor_new(const char *str)
{
StringInputVisitor *v;
assert(str);
v = g_malloc0(sizeof(*v));
v->visitor.type = VISITOR_INPUT;
v->visitor.type_int64 = parse_type_int64;
v->visitor.type_uint64 = parse_type_uint64;
v->visitor.type_size = parse_type_size;
v->visitor.type_bool = parse_type_bool;
v->visitor.type_str = parse_type_str;
v->visitor.type_number = parse_type_number;
v->visitor.type_null = parse_type_null;
v->visitor.start_list = start_list;
v->visitor.next_list = next_list;
v->visitor.check_list = check_list;
v->visitor.end_list = end_list;
v->visitor.free = string_input_free;
v->string = str;
qapi: Rewrite string-input-visitor's integer and list parsing The input visitor has some problems right now, especially - unsigned type "Range" is used to process signed ranges, resulting in inconsistent behavior and ugly/magical code - uint64_t are parsed like int64_t, so big uint64_t values are not supported and error messages are misleading - lists/ranges of int64_t are accepted although no list is parsed and we should rather report an error - lists/ranges are preparsed using int64_t, making it hard to implement uint64_t values or uint64_t lists - types that don't support lists don't bail out - visiting beyond the end of a list is not handled properly - we don't actually parse lists, we parse *sets*: members are sorted, and duplicates eliminated So let's rewrite it by getting rid of usage of the type "Range" and properly supporting lists of int64_t and uint64_t (including ranges of both types), fixing the above mentioned issues. Lists of other types are not supported and will properly report an error. Virtual walks are now supported. Tests have to be fixed up: - Two BUGs were hardcoded that are fixed now - The string-input-visitor now actually returns a parsed list and not an ordered set. Please note that no users/callers have to be fixed up. Candidates using visit_type_uint16List() and friends are: - backends/hostmem.c:host_memory_backend_set_host_nodes() -- Code can deal with duplicates/unsorted lists - numa.c::query_memdev() -- via object_property_get_uint16List(), the list will still be sorted and without duplicates (via host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes()) - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_Memdev_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_NumaNodeOptions_members() - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RockerOfDpaGroup_members - qapi-visit.c::visit_type_RxFilterInfo_members() -- Not used with string-input-visitor. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181121164421.20780-7-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-11-21 19:44:18 +03:00
v->lm = LM_NONE;
return &v->visitor;
}