qemu/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out

232 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

alternate AltEnumBool
tag type
case e: EnumOne
case b: bool
alternate AltEnumInt
tag type
case e: EnumOne
case i: int
alternate AltEnumNum
tag type
case e: EnumOne
case n: number
alternate AltNumEnum
tag type
case n: number
case e: EnumOne
qapi: Reject alternates that can't work with keyval_parse() Alternates are sum types like unions, but use the JSON type on the wire / QType in QObject instead of an explicit tag. That's why we require alternate members to have distinct QTypes. The recently introduced keyval_parse() (commit d454dbe) can only produce string scalars. The qobject_input_visitor_new_keyval() input visitor mostly hides the difference, so code using a QObject input visitor doesn't have to care whether its input was parsed from JSON or KEY=VALUE,... The difference leaks for alternates, as noted in commit 0ee9ae7: a non-string, non-enum scalar alternate value can't currently be expressed. In part, this is just our insufficiently sophisticated implementation. Consider alternate type 'GuestFileWhence'. It has an integer member and a 'QGASeek' member. The latter is an enumeration with values 'set', 'cur', 'end'. The meaning of b=set, b=cur, b=end, b=0, b=1 and so forth is perfectly obvious. However, our current implementation falls apart at run time for b=0, b=1, and so forth. Fixable, but not today; add a test case and a TODO comment. Now consider an alternate type with a string and an integer member. What's the meaning of a=42? Is it the string "42" or the integer 42? Whichever meaning you pick makes the other inexpressible. This isn't just an implementation problem, it's fundamental. Our current implementation will pick string. So far, we haven't needed such alternates. To make sure we stop and think before we add one that cannot sanely work with keyval_parse(), let's require alternate members to have sufficiently distinct representation in KEY=VALUE,... syntax: * A string member clashes with any other scalar member * An enumeration member clashes with bool members when it has value 'on' or 'off'. * An enumeration member clashes with numeric members when it has a value that starts with '-', '+', or a decimal digit. This is a rather lazy approximation of the actual number syntax accepted by the visitor. Note that enumeration values starting with '-' and '+' are rejected elsewhere already, but better safe than sorry. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1495471335-23707-5-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
2017-05-22 19:42:15 +03:00
alternate AltStrObj
tag type
case s: str
qapi: Reject alternates that can't work with keyval_parse() Alternates are sum types like unions, but use the JSON type on the wire / QType in QObject instead of an explicit tag. That's why we require alternate members to have distinct QTypes. The recently introduced keyval_parse() (commit d454dbe) can only produce string scalars. The qobject_input_visitor_new_keyval() input visitor mostly hides the difference, so code using a QObject input visitor doesn't have to care whether its input was parsed from JSON or KEY=VALUE,... The difference leaks for alternates, as noted in commit 0ee9ae7: a non-string, non-enum scalar alternate value can't currently be expressed. In part, this is just our insufficiently sophisticated implementation. Consider alternate type 'GuestFileWhence'. It has an integer member and a 'QGASeek' member. The latter is an enumeration with values 'set', 'cur', 'end'. The meaning of b=set, b=cur, b=end, b=0, b=1 and so forth is perfectly obvious. However, our current implementation falls apart at run time for b=0, b=1, and so forth. Fixable, but not today; add a test case and a TODO comment. Now consider an alternate type with a string and an integer member. What's the meaning of a=42? Is it the string "42" or the integer 42? Whichever meaning you pick makes the other inexpressible. This isn't just an implementation problem, it's fundamental. Our current implementation will pick string. So far, we haven't needed such alternates. To make sure we stop and think before we add one that cannot sanely work with keyval_parse(), let's require alternate members to have sufficiently distinct representation in KEY=VALUE,... syntax: * A string member clashes with any other scalar member * An enumeration member clashes with bool members when it has value 'on' or 'off'. * An enumeration member clashes with numeric members when it has a value that starts with '-', '+', or a decimal digit. This is a rather lazy approximation of the actual number syntax accepted by the visitor. Note that enumeration values starting with '-' and '+' are rejected elsewhere already, but better safe than sorry. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1495471335-23707-5-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
2017-05-22 19:42:15 +03:00
case o: TestStruct
event EVENT_A None
boxed=False
event EVENT_B None
boxed=False
event EVENT_C q_obj_EVENT_C-arg
boxed=False
event EVENT_D q_obj_EVENT_D-arg
boxed=False
qapi: Implement boxed types for commands/events Turn on the ability to pass command and event arguments in a single boxed parameter, which must name a non-empty type (although the type can be a struct with all optional members). For structs, it makes it possible to pass a single qapi type instead of a breakout of all struct members (useful if the arguments are already in a struct or if the number of members is large); for other complex types, it is now possible to use a union or alternate as the data for a command or event. The empty type may be technically feasible if needed down the road, but it's easier to forbid it now and relax things to allow it later, than it is to allow it now and have to special case how the generated 'q_empty' type is handled (see commit 7ce106a9 for reasons why nothing is generated for the empty type). An alternate type is never considered empty, but now that a boxed type can be either an object or an alternate, we have to provide a trivial QAPISchemaAlternateType.is_empty(). The new call to arg_type.is_empty() during QAPISchemaCommand.check() requires that we first check the type in question; but there is no chance of introducing a cycle since objects do not refer back to commands. We still have a split in syntax checking between ad-hoc parsing up front (merely validates that 'boxed' has a sane value) and during .check() methods (if 'boxed' is set, then 'data' must name a non-empty user-defined type). Generated code is unchanged, as long as no client uses the new feature. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1468468228-27827-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Test files renamed to *-boxed-*] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-07-14 06:50:20 +03:00
event EVENT_E UserDefZero
boxed=True
event EVENT_F UserDefAlternate
boxed=True
tests/qapi-schema: Test for reserved names, empty struct Add some testsuite coverage to ensure future patches are on the right track: Our current C representation of qapi arrays is done by appending 'List' to the element name; but we are not preventing the creation of an object type with the same name. Add reserved-type-list.json to test this. Then rename enum-union-clash.json to reserved-type-kind.json to cover the reservation that we DO detect, and shorten it to match the fact that the name is reserved even if there is no clash. We are failing to detect a collision between a dictionary member and the implicit 'has_*' flag for another optional member. The easiest fix would be for a future patch to reserve the entire "has[-_]" namespace for member names (the collision is also possible for branch names within flat unions, but only as long as branch names can collide with (non-variant) members; however, since future patches are about to remove that, it is not worth testing here). Add reserved-member-has.json to test this. A similar collision exists between a dictionary member where c_name() munges what might otherwise be a reserved name to start with 'q_', and another member explicitly starts with "q[-_]". Again, the easiest solution for a future patch will be reserving the entire namespace, but here for commands as well as members. Add reserved-member-q.json and reserved-command-q.json to test this; separate tests since arguably our munging of command 'unix' to 'qmp_q_unix()' could be done without a q_, which is different than the munging of a member 'unix' to 'foo.q_unix'. Finally, our testsuite does not have any compilation coverage of struct inheritance with empty qapi structs. Update qapi-schema-test.json to test this. Note that there is currently no technical reason to forbid type name patterns from member names, or member name patterns from types, since the two are not in the same namespace in C and won't collide; but it's not worth adding positive tests of these corner cases at this time, especially while there is other churn pending in patches that rearrange which collisions actually happen. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-2-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-10-27 01:34:40 +03:00
object Empty1
object Empty2
base Empty1
enum EnumOne ['value1', 'value2', 'value3']
object EventStructOne
member struct1: UserDefOne optional=False
member string: str optional=False
member enum2: EnumOne optional=True
qapi: Lazy creation of array types Commit ac88219a had several TODO markers about whether we needed to automatically create the corresponding array type alongside any other type. It turns out that most of the time, we don't! There are a few exceptions: 1) We have a few situations where we use an array type in internal code but do not expose that type through QMP; fix it by declaring a dummy type that forces the generator to see that we want to use the array type. 2) The builtin arrays (such as intList for QAPI ['int']) must always be generated, because of the way our QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN compile guard works: we have situations (at the very least tests/test-qmp-output-visitor.c) that include both top-level "qapi-types.h" (via "error.h") and a secondary "test-qapi-types.h". If we were to only emit the builtin types when used locally, then the first .h file would not include all types, but the second .h does not declare anything at all because the first .h set QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN, and we would end up with compilation error due to things like unknown type 'int8List'. Actually, we may need to revisit how we do type guards, and change from a single QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN over to a different usage pattern that does one #ifdef per qapi type - right now, the only types that are declared multiple times between two qapi .json files for inclusion by a single .c file happen to be the builtin arrays. But now that we have QAPI 'include' statements, it is logical to assume that we will soon reach a point where we want to reuse non-builtin types (yes, I'm thinking about what it will take to add introspection to QGA, where we will want to reuse the SchemaInfo type and friends). One #ifdef per type will help ensure that generating the same qapi type into more than one qapi-types.h won't cause collisions when both are included in the same .c file; but we also have to solve how to avoid creating duplicate qapi-types.c entry points. So that is a problem left for another day. Generated code for qapi-types and qapi-visit is drastically reduced; less than a third of the arrays that were blindly created were actually needed (a quick grep shows we dropped from 219 to 69 *List types), and the .o files lost more than 30% of their bulk. [For best results, diff the generated files with 'git diff --patience --no-index pre post'.] Interestingly, the introspection output is unchanged - this is because we already cull all types that are not indirectly reachable from a command or event, so introspection was already using only a subset of array types. The subset of types introspected is now a much larger percentage of the overall set of array types emitted in qapi-types.h (since the larger set shrunk), but still not 100% (evidence that the array types emitted for our new Dummy structs, and the new struct itself, don't affect QMP). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1444710158-8723-9-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Moved array info tracking to a later patch] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-10-13 07:22:28 +03:00
object ForceArrays
member unused1: UserDefOneList optional=False
member unused2: UserDefTwoList optional=False
member unused3: TestStructList optional=False
enum MyEnum []
object NestedEnumsOne
member enum1: EnumOne optional=False
member enum2: EnumOne optional=True
member enum3: EnumOne optional=False
member enum4: EnumOne optional=True
enum QEnumTwo ['value1', 'value2']
prefix QENUM_TWO
enum QType ['none', 'qnull', 'qnum', 'qstring', 'qdict', 'qlist', 'qbool']
prefix QTYPE
object TestStruct
member integer: int optional=False
member boolean: bool optional=False
member string: str optional=False
object UserDefA
member boolean: bool optional=False
qapi: Test for various name collisions Expose some weaknesses in the generator: we don't always forbid the generation of structs that contain multiple members that map to the same C or QMP name. This has already been marked FIXME in qapi.py in commit d90675f, but having more tests will make sure future patches produce desired behavior; and updating existing patches to better document things doesn't hurt, either. Some of these collisions are already caught in the old-style parser checks, but ultimately we want all collisions to be caught in the new-style QAPISchema*.check() methods. This patch focuses on C struct members, and does not consider collisions between commands and events (affecting C function names), or even collisions between generated C type names with user type names (for things like automatic FOOList struct representing array types or FOOKind for an implicit enum). There are two types of struct collisions we want to catch: 1) Collision between two keys in a JSON object. qapi.py prevents that within a single struct (see test duplicate-key), but it is possible to have collisions between a type's members and its base type's members (existing tests struct-base-clash, struct-base-clash-deep), and its flat union variant members (renamed test flat-union-clash-member). 2) Collision between two members of the C struct that is generated for a given QAPI type: a) Multiple QAPI names map to the same C name (new test args-name-clash) b) A QAPI name maps to a C name that is used for another purpose (new tests flat-union-clash-branch, struct-base-clash-base, union-clash-data). We already fixed some such cases in commit 0f61af3e and 1e6c1616, but more remain. c) Two C names generated for other purposes clash (updated test alternate-clash, new test union-clash-branches, union-clash-type, flat-union-clash-type) Ultimately, if we need to have a flat union where a tag value clashes with a base member name, we could change the generator to name the union (using 'foo.u.value' rather than 'foo.value') or otherwise munge the C name corresponding to tag values. But unless such a need arises, it will probably be easier to just forbid these collisions. Some of these negative tests will be deleted later, and positive tests added to qapi-schema-test.json in their place, when the generator code is reworked to avoid particular code generation collisions in class 2). [Note that viewing this patch with git rename detection enabled may see some confusion due to renaming some tests while adding others, but where the content is similar enough that git picks the wrong pre- and post-patch files to associate] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Improve commit message and comments a bit, drop an unrelated test] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-09-30 01:21:03 +03:00
member a_b: int optional=True
alternate UserDefAlternate
tag type
case udfu: UserDefFlatUnion
case e: EnumOne
case i: int
case n: null
object UserDefB
member intb: int optional=False
qapi: Test for various name collisions Expose some weaknesses in the generator: we don't always forbid the generation of structs that contain multiple members that map to the same C or QMP name. This has already been marked FIXME in qapi.py in commit d90675f, but having more tests will make sure future patches produce desired behavior; and updating existing patches to better document things doesn't hurt, either. Some of these collisions are already caught in the old-style parser checks, but ultimately we want all collisions to be caught in the new-style QAPISchema*.check() methods. This patch focuses on C struct members, and does not consider collisions between commands and events (affecting C function names), or even collisions between generated C type names with user type names (for things like automatic FOOList struct representing array types or FOOKind for an implicit enum). There are two types of struct collisions we want to catch: 1) Collision between two keys in a JSON object. qapi.py prevents that within a single struct (see test duplicate-key), but it is possible to have collisions between a type's members and its base type's members (existing tests struct-base-clash, struct-base-clash-deep), and its flat union variant members (renamed test flat-union-clash-member). 2) Collision between two members of the C struct that is generated for a given QAPI type: a) Multiple QAPI names map to the same C name (new test args-name-clash) b) A QAPI name maps to a C name that is used for another purpose (new tests flat-union-clash-branch, struct-base-clash-base, union-clash-data). We already fixed some such cases in commit 0f61af3e and 1e6c1616, but more remain. c) Two C names generated for other purposes clash (updated test alternate-clash, new test union-clash-branches, union-clash-type, flat-union-clash-type) Ultimately, if we need to have a flat union where a tag value clashes with a base member name, we could change the generator to name the union (using 'foo.u.value' rather than 'foo.value') or otherwise munge the C name corresponding to tag values. But unless such a need arises, it will probably be easier to just forbid these collisions. Some of these negative tests will be deleted later, and positive tests added to qapi-schema-test.json in their place, when the generator code is reworked to avoid particular code generation collisions in class 2). [Note that viewing this patch with git rename detection enabled may see some confusion due to renaming some tests while adding others, but where the content is similar enough that git picks the wrong pre- and post-patch files to associate] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Improve commit message and comments a bit, drop an unrelated test] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-09-30 01:21:03 +03:00
member a-b: bool optional=True
object UserDefC
member string1: str optional=False
member string2: str optional=False
object UserDefFlatUnion
base UserDefUnionBase
tag enum1
case value1: UserDefA
case value2: UserDefB
case value3: UserDefB
object UserDefFlatUnion2
base q_obj_UserDefFlatUnion2-base
tag enum1
case value1: UserDefC
case value2: UserDefB
object UserDefNativeListUnion
member type: UserDefNativeListUnionKind optional=False
tag type
case integer: q_obj_intList-wrapper
case s8: q_obj_int8List-wrapper
case s16: q_obj_int16List-wrapper
case s32: q_obj_int32List-wrapper
case s64: q_obj_int64List-wrapper
case u8: q_obj_uint8List-wrapper
case u16: q_obj_uint16List-wrapper
case u32: q_obj_uint32List-wrapper
case u64: q_obj_uint64List-wrapper
case number: q_obj_numberList-wrapper
case boolean: q_obj_boolList-wrapper
case string: q_obj_strList-wrapper
case sizes: q_obj_sizeList-wrapper
case any: q_obj_anyList-wrapper
enum UserDefNativeListUnionKind ['integer', 's8', 's16', 's32', 's64', 'u8', 'u16', 'u32', 'u64', 'number', 'boolean', 'string', 'sizes', 'any']
object UserDefOne
base UserDefZero
member string: str optional=False
member enum1: EnumOne optional=True
object UserDefOptions
member i64: intList optional=True
member u64: uint64List optional=True
member u16: uint16List optional=True
member i64x: int optional=True
member u64x: uint64 optional=True
object UserDefTwo
member string0: str optional=False
member dict1: UserDefTwoDict optional=False
object UserDefTwoDict
member string1: str optional=False
member dict2: UserDefTwoDictDict optional=False
member dict3: UserDefTwoDictDict optional=True
object UserDefTwoDictDict
member userdef: UserDefOne optional=False
member string: str optional=False
object UserDefUnionBase
base UserDefZero
member string: str optional=False
member enum1: EnumOne optional=False
object UserDefZero
member integer: int optional=False
object WrapAlternate
member alt: UserDefAlternate optional=False
event __ORG.QEMU_X-EVENT __org.qemu_x-Struct
boxed=False
alternate __org.qemu_x-Alt
tag type
case __org.qemu_x-branch: str
case b: __org.qemu_x-Base
object __org.qemu_x-Base
member __org.qemu_x-member1: __org.qemu_x-Enum optional=False
enum __org.qemu_x-Enum ['__org.qemu_x-value']
object __org.qemu_x-Struct
base __org.qemu_x-Base
member __org.qemu_x-member2: str optional=False
member wchar-t: int optional=True
object __org.qemu_x-Struct2
member array: __org.qemu_x-Union1List optional=False
object __org.qemu_x-Union1
member type: __org.qemu_x-Union1Kind optional=False
tag type
case __org.qemu_x-branch: q_obj_str-wrapper
enum __org.qemu_x-Union1Kind ['__org.qemu_x-branch']
object __org.qemu_x-Union2
base __org.qemu_x-Base
tag __org.qemu_x-member1
case __org.qemu_x-value: __org.qemu_x-Struct2
command __org.qemu_x-command q_obj___org.qemu_x-command-arg -> __org.qemu_x-Union1
gen=True success_response=True boxed=False
qapi: Implement boxed types for commands/events Turn on the ability to pass command and event arguments in a single boxed parameter, which must name a non-empty type (although the type can be a struct with all optional members). For structs, it makes it possible to pass a single qapi type instead of a breakout of all struct members (useful if the arguments are already in a struct or if the number of members is large); for other complex types, it is now possible to use a union or alternate as the data for a command or event. The empty type may be technically feasible if needed down the road, but it's easier to forbid it now and relax things to allow it later, than it is to allow it now and have to special case how the generated 'q_empty' type is handled (see commit 7ce106a9 for reasons why nothing is generated for the empty type). An alternate type is never considered empty, but now that a boxed type can be either an object or an alternate, we have to provide a trivial QAPISchemaAlternateType.is_empty(). The new call to arg_type.is_empty() during QAPISchemaCommand.check() requires that we first check the type in question; but there is no chance of introducing a cycle since objects do not refer back to commands. We still have a split in syntax checking between ad-hoc parsing up front (merely validates that 'boxed' has a sane value) and during .check() methods (if 'boxed' is set, then 'data' must name a non-empty user-defined type). Generated code is unchanged, as long as no client uses the new feature. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1468468228-27827-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Test files renamed to *-boxed-*] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-07-14 06:50:20 +03:00
command boxed-struct UserDefZero -> None
gen=True success_response=True boxed=True
command boxed-union UserDefNativeListUnion -> None
gen=True success_response=True boxed=True
command guest-get-time q_obj_guest-get-time-arg -> int
gen=True success_response=True boxed=False
command guest-sync q_obj_guest-sync-arg -> any
gen=True success_response=True boxed=False
object q_empty
object q_obj_EVENT_C-arg
member a: int optional=True
member b: UserDefOne optional=True
member c: str optional=False
object q_obj_EVENT_D-arg
member a: EventStructOne optional=False
member b: str optional=False
member c: str optional=True
member enum3: EnumOne optional=True
object q_obj_UserDefFlatUnion2-base
member integer: int optional=True
member string: str optional=False
member enum1: QEnumTwo optional=False
object q_obj___org.qemu_x-command-arg
member a: __org.qemu_x-EnumList optional=False
member b: __org.qemu_x-StructList optional=False
member c: __org.qemu_x-Union2 optional=False
member d: __org.qemu_x-Alt optional=False
object q_obj_anyList-wrapper
member data: anyList optional=False
object q_obj_boolList-wrapper
member data: boolList optional=False
object q_obj_guest-get-time-arg
member a: int optional=False
member b: int optional=True
object q_obj_guest-sync-arg
member arg: any optional=False
object q_obj_int16List-wrapper
member data: int16List optional=False
object q_obj_int32List-wrapper
member data: int32List optional=False
object q_obj_int64List-wrapper
member data: int64List optional=False
object q_obj_int8List-wrapper
member data: int8List optional=False
object q_obj_intList-wrapper
member data: intList optional=False
object q_obj_numberList-wrapper
member data: numberList optional=False
object q_obj_sizeList-wrapper
member data: sizeList optional=False
object q_obj_str-wrapper
member data: str optional=False
object q_obj_strList-wrapper
member data: strList optional=False
object q_obj_uint16List-wrapper
member data: uint16List optional=False
object q_obj_uint32List-wrapper
member data: uint32List optional=False
object q_obj_uint64List-wrapper
member data: uint64List optional=False
object q_obj_uint8List-wrapper
member data: uint8List optional=False
object q_obj_user_def_cmd1-arg
member ud1a: UserDefOne optional=False
object q_obj_user_def_cmd2-arg
member ud1a: UserDefOne optional=False
member ud1b: UserDefOne optional=True
command user_def_cmd None -> None
gen=True success_response=True boxed=False
command user_def_cmd0 Empty2 -> Empty2
gen=True success_response=True boxed=False
command user_def_cmd1 q_obj_user_def_cmd1-arg -> None
gen=True success_response=True boxed=False
command user_def_cmd2 q_obj_user_def_cmd2-arg -> UserDefTwo
gen=True success_response=True boxed=False