qemu/block/raw_bsd.c

210 lines
6.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
/* BlockDriver implementation for "raw"
*
* Copyright (C) 2010, 2013, Red Hat, Inc.
* Copyright (C) 2010, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
* Copyright (C) 2009, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
*
* Author:
* Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
* of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
* deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
* rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
* sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
* furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
* all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
* AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
* IN THE SOFTWARE.
*/
#include "block/block_int.h"
#include "qemu/option.h"
static QemuOptsList raw_create_opts = {
.name = "raw-create-opts",
.head = QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(raw_create_opts.head),
.desc = {
{
.name = BLOCK_OPT_SIZE,
.type = QEMU_OPT_SIZE,
.help = "Virtual disk size"
},
{ /* end of list */ }
}
};
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
static int raw_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *reopen_state,
BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return 0;
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int coroutine_fn raw_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
BLKDBG_EVENT(bs->file, BLKDBG_READ_AIO);
return bdrv_co_readv(bs->file, sector_num, nb_sectors, qiov);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int coroutine_fn raw_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
BLKDBG_EVENT(bs->file, BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO);
return bdrv_co_writev(bs->file, sector_num, nb_sectors, qiov);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int64_t coroutine_fn raw_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
int64_t sector_num,
int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
*pnum = nb_sectors;
return BDRV_BLOCK_RAW | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA |
(sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int coroutine_fn raw_co_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors,
BdrvRequestFlags flags)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_co_write_zeroes(bs->file, sector_num, nb_sectors, flags);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int coroutine_fn raw_co_discard(BlockDriverState *bs,
int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_co_discard(bs->file, sector_num, nb_sectors);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int64_t raw_getlength(BlockDriverState *bs)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_getlength(bs->file);
}
static int raw_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverInfo *bdi)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_get_info(bs->file, bdi);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int raw_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs)
{
bs->bl = bs->file->bl;
return 0;
}
static int raw_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_truncate(bs->file, offset);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int raw_is_inserted(BlockDriverState *bs)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_is_inserted(bs->file);
}
static int raw_media_changed(BlockDriverState *bs)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_media_changed(bs->file);
}
static void raw_eject(BlockDriverState *bs, bool eject_flag)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
bdrv_eject(bs->file, eject_flag);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static void raw_lock_medium(BlockDriverState *bs, bool locked)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
bdrv_lock_medium(bs->file, locked);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int raw_ioctl(BlockDriverState *bs, unsigned long int req, void *buf)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_ioctl(bs->file, req, buf);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static BlockDriverAIOCB *raw_aio_ioctl(BlockDriverState *bs,
unsigned long int req, void *buf,
BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb,
void *opaque)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_aio_ioctl(bs->file, req, buf, cb, opaque);
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
}
static int raw_has_zero_init(BlockDriverState *bs)
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> >> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header >> >> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is >>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should >>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line. >>>> >>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2. >>> >>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering? >>> >>> (No rants, please. :)) >> >> What's the scope exactly? > > It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like > > static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > return bdrv_foo(bs->file); > } > > It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you > because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer > confirmed it). > > Basically: > > 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are > interesting: > > .bdrv_reopen_prepare > .bdrv_co_readv > .bdrv_co_writev > .bdrv_co_is_allocated > .bdrv_co_write_zeroes > .bdrv_co_discard > .bdrv_getlength > .bdrv_get_info > .bdrv_truncate > .bdrv_is_inserted > .bdrv_media_changed > .bdrv_eject > .bdrv_lock_medium > .bdrv_ioctl > .bdrv_aio_ioctl > .bdrv_has_zero_init > > They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above). > There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this > already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly... > > The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also > call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The > events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO. > > 2) This is also a simple forwarder function: > > .bdrv_create > > but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function > does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function > is bdrv_create_file. > > 3) These members are special > > .format_name is the string "raw" > .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0 > .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing > .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1. > > 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of > QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only > option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something > to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c. > > 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*). > You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init. > > 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to > your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should > be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit > message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering. > > 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c. > > Paolo This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template. The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from "util/qemu-progress.c". Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
{
return bdrv_has_zero_init(bs->file);
}
static int raw_create(const char *filename, QemuOpts *opts, Error **errp)
{
Error *local_err = NULL;
int ret;
ret = bdrv_create_file(filename, opts, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
}
return ret;
}
static int raw_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options, int flags,
Error **errp)
{
bs->sg = bs->file->sg;
return 0;
}
static void raw_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
{
}
static int raw_probe(const uint8_t *buf, int buf_size, const char *filename)
{
/* smallest possible positive score so that raw is used if and only if no
* other block driver works
*/
return 1;
}
static BlockDriver bdrv_raw = {
.format_name = "raw",
.bdrv_probe = &raw_probe,
.bdrv_reopen_prepare = &raw_reopen_prepare,
.bdrv_open = &raw_open,
.bdrv_close = &raw_close,
.bdrv_create = &raw_create,
.bdrv_co_readv = &raw_co_readv,
.bdrv_co_writev = &raw_co_writev,
.bdrv_co_write_zeroes = &raw_co_write_zeroes,
.bdrv_co_discard = &raw_co_discard,
.bdrv_co_get_block_status = &raw_co_get_block_status,
.bdrv_truncate = &raw_truncate,
.bdrv_getlength = &raw_getlength,
2013-10-29 15:18:58 +04:00
.has_variable_length = true,
.bdrv_get_info = &raw_get_info,
.bdrv_refresh_limits = &raw_refresh_limits,
.bdrv_is_inserted = &raw_is_inserted,
.bdrv_media_changed = &raw_media_changed,
.bdrv_eject = &raw_eject,
.bdrv_lock_medium = &raw_lock_medium,
.bdrv_ioctl = &raw_ioctl,
.bdrv_aio_ioctl = &raw_aio_ioctl,
.create_opts = &raw_create_opts,
.bdrv_has_zero_init = &raw_has_zero_init
};
static void bdrv_raw_init(void)
{
bdrv_register(&bdrv_raw);
}
block_init(bdrv_raw_init);