add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
/* BlockDriver implementation for "raw"
|
|
|
|
*
|
2013-08-21 14:41:21 +04:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2010, 2013, Red Hat, Inc.
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2010, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
|
2013-08-21 14:41:22 +04:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2009, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Author:
|
|
|
|
* Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
|
|
|
|
* of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
|
|
|
|
* deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
|
|
|
|
* rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
|
|
|
|
* sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
|
|
|
|
* furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
|
|
|
|
* all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
|
|
|
|
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
|
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
|
|
|
|
* AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
|
|
|
|
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
|
|
|
|
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
|
|
|
|
* IN THE SOFTWARE.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "block/block_int.h"
|
2013-08-21 14:41:21 +04:00
|
|
|
#include "qemu/option.h"
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-05 13:21:03 +04:00
|
|
|
static QemuOptsList raw_create_opts = {
|
|
|
|
.name = "raw-create-opts",
|
|
|
|
.head = QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(raw_create_opts.head),
|
|
|
|
.desc = {
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
.name = BLOCK_OPT_SIZE,
|
|
|
|
.type = QEMU_OPT_SIZE,
|
|
|
|
.help = "Virtual disk size"
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{ /* end of list */ }
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-08-21 14:41:21 +04:00
|
|
|
};
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *reopen_state,
|
|
|
|
BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int coroutine_fn raw_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
|
|
|
|
int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:18 +04:00
|
|
|
BLKDBG_EVENT(bs->file, BLKDBG_READ_AIO);
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
return bdrv_co_readv(bs->file, sector_num, nb_sectors, qiov);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int coroutine_fn raw_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
|
|
|
|
int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:18 +04:00
|
|
|
BLKDBG_EVENT(bs->file, BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO);
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
return bdrv_co_writev(bs->file, sector_num, nb_sectors, qiov);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-04 21:00:28 +04:00
|
|
|
static int64_t coroutine_fn raw_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
|
|
|
|
int64_t sector_num,
|
|
|
|
int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-08 16:43:14 +04:00
|
|
|
*pnum = nb_sectors;
|
|
|
|
return BDRV_BLOCK_RAW | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA |
|
|
|
|
(sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int coroutine_fn raw_co_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
|
2013-10-24 14:06:51 +04:00
|
|
|
int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors,
|
|
|
|
BdrvRequestFlags flags)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-24 14:06:51 +04:00
|
|
|
return bdrv_co_write_zeroes(bs->file, sector_num, nb_sectors, flags);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int coroutine_fn raw_co_discard(BlockDriverState *bs,
|
|
|
|
int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
return bdrv_co_discard(bs->file, sector_num, nb_sectors);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int64_t raw_getlength(BlockDriverState *bs)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return bdrv_getlength(bs->file);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverInfo *bdi)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
return bdrv_get_info(bs->file, bdi);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-04 14:54:13 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
bs->bl = bs->file->bl;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
return bdrv_truncate(bs->file, offset);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_is_inserted(BlockDriverState *bs)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return bdrv_is_inserted(bs->file);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_media_changed(BlockDriverState *bs)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return bdrv_media_changed(bs->file);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static void raw_eject(BlockDriverState *bs, bool eject_flag)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
bdrv_eject(bs->file, eject_flag);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static void raw_lock_medium(BlockDriverState *bs, bool locked)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
bdrv_lock_medium(bs->file, locked);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_ioctl(BlockDriverState *bs, unsigned long int req, void *buf)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
return bdrv_ioctl(bs->file, req, buf);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static BlockDriverAIOCB *raw_aio_ioctl(BlockDriverState *bs,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long int req, void *buf,
|
|
|
|
BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb,
|
|
|
|
void *opaque)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
return bdrv_aio_ioctl(bs->file, req, buf, cb, opaque);
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_has_zero_init(BlockDriverState *bs)
|
add skeleton for BSD licensed "raw" BlockDriver
On 08/05/13 15:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
>> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 2:43:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header
>>
>> On 08/02/13 00:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2013 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is
>>>>> reasonable to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should
>>>>> ACK by replying with a Signed-off-by line.
>>>>
>>>> The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
>>>
>>> Laszlo, would you be willing to do clean-room reverse engineering?
>>>
>>> (No rants, please. :))
>>
>> What's the scope exactly?
>
> It's quite small, it's a file full of forwarders like
>
> static void raw_foo(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> return bdrv_foo(bs->file);
> }
>
> It's 170 lines of code, all as boring as this. I only picked you
> because I'm quite certain you have never seen the file (and the answer
> confirmed it).
>
> Basically:
>
> 1) BlockDriver is a struct in which these function members are
> interesting:
>
> .bdrv_reopen_prepare
> .bdrv_co_readv
> .bdrv_co_writev
> .bdrv_co_is_allocated
> .bdrv_co_write_zeroes
> .bdrv_co_discard
> .bdrv_getlength
> .bdrv_get_info
> .bdrv_truncate
> .bdrv_is_inserted
> .bdrv_media_changed
> .bdrv_eject
> .bdrv_lock_medium
> .bdrv_ioctl
> .bdrv_aio_ioctl
> .bdrv_has_zero_init
>
> They should be implemented as simple forwarders (see above).
> There are 16 functions listed here, you can easily see how this
> already accounts for 100+ SLOC roughly...
>
> The implementations of bdrv_co_readv and bdrv_co_writev should also
> call BLKDBG_EVENT on bs->file too, before forwarding to bs->file. The
> events to be generated are BLKDBG_READ_AIO and BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO.
>
> 2) This is also a simple forwarder function:
>
> .bdrv_create
>
> but there is no BlockDriverState argument so the forwarded-to function
> does not have a bs->file argument either. The forwarded-to function
> is bdrv_create_file.
>
> 3) These members are special
>
> .format_name is the string "raw"
> .bdrv_open raw_open should set bs->sg to bs->file->sg and return 0
> .bdrv_close raw_close should do nothing
> .bdrv_probe raw_probe should just return 1.
>
> 4) There is another member, .create_options, which is an array of
> QEMUOptionParameter structs, terminated by an all-zero item. The only
> option you need is for the virtual disk size. You will find something
> to copy from in other block drivers, for example block/qcow2.c.
>
> 5) Formats are registered with bdrv_register (takes a BlockDriver*).
> You also need to pass the caller of bdrv_register to block_init.
>
> 6) I'm not sure how to organize the patch series, so I'll leave this to
> your creativity. I guess in this case move/copy detection of git should
> be disabled. I would definitely include this spec in the commit
> message as a proof of clean-room reverse engineering.
>
> 7) Remember a BSD header like the one in block.c.
>
> Paolo
This patch implements the email up to the paragraph ending with "100+ SLOC
roughly". The skeleton is generated from the list there, with a simple
shell loop using "sed" and the raw_foo() template.
The BSD license block is copied (and reflowed) from
"util/qemu-progress.c".
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2013-08-21 14:41:17 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return bdrv_has_zero_init(bs->file);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-05 13:21:03 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_create(const char *filename, QemuOpts *opts, Error **errp)
|
2013-08-21 14:41:19 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-09-06 19:14:26 +04:00
|
|
|
Error *local_err = NULL;
|
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-05 13:21:11 +04:00
|
|
|
ret = bdrv_create_file(filename, opts, &local_err);
|
2014-01-30 18:07:28 +04:00
|
|
|
if (local_err) {
|
2013-10-10 17:44:00 +04:00
|
|
|
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
|
2013-09-06 19:14:26 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2013-08-21 14:41:19 +04:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-08-21 14:41:20 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-09-05 16:22:29 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options, int flags,
|
|
|
|
Error **errp)
|
2013-08-21 14:41:20 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
bs->sg = bs->file->sg;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static void raw_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
|
2013-08-21 14:41:20 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 14:41:23 +04:00
|
|
|
static int raw_probe(const uint8_t *buf, int buf_size, const char *filename)
|
2013-08-21 14:41:20 +04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* smallest possible positive score so that raw is used if and only if no
|
|
|
|
* other block driver works
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-08-21 14:41:22 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static BlockDriver bdrv_raw = {
|
|
|
|
.format_name = "raw",
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_probe = &raw_probe,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_reopen_prepare = &raw_reopen_prepare,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_open = &raw_open,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_close = &raw_close,
|
2014-06-05 13:21:11 +04:00
|
|
|
.bdrv_create = &raw_create,
|
2013-08-21 14:41:22 +04:00
|
|
|
.bdrv_co_readv = &raw_co_readv,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_co_writev = &raw_co_writev,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_co_write_zeroes = &raw_co_write_zeroes,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_co_discard = &raw_co_discard,
|
2013-09-04 21:00:28 +04:00
|
|
|
.bdrv_co_get_block_status = &raw_co_get_block_status,
|
2013-08-21 14:41:22 +04:00
|
|
|
.bdrv_truncate = &raw_truncate,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_getlength = &raw_getlength,
|
block: Avoid unecessary drv->bdrv_getlength() calls
The block layer generally keeps the size of an image cached in
bs->total_sectors so that it doesn't have to perform expensive
operations to get the size whenever it needs it.
This doesn't work however when using a backend that can change its size
without qemu being aware of it, i.e. passthrough of removable media like
CD-ROMs or floppy disks. For this reason, the caching is disabled when a
removable device is used.
It is obvious that checking whether the _guest_ device has removable
media isn't the right thing to do when we want to know whether the size
of the host backend can change. To make things worse, non-top-level
BlockDriverStates never have any device attached, which makes qemu
assume they are removable, so drv->bdrv_getlength() is always called on
the protocol layer. In the case of raw-posix, this causes unnecessary
lseek() system calls, which turned out to be rather expensive.
This patch completely changes the logic and disables bs->total_sectors
caching only for certain block driver types, for which a size change is
expected: host_cdrom and host_floppy on POSIX, host_device on win32; also
the raw format in case it sits on top of one of these protocols, but in
the common case the nested bdrv_getlength() call on the protocol driver
will use the cache again and avoid an expensive drv->bdrv_getlength()
call.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2013-10-29 15:18:58 +04:00
|
|
|
.has_variable_length = true,
|
2013-08-21 14:41:22 +04:00
|
|
|
.bdrv_get_info = &raw_get_info,
|
2014-02-04 14:54:13 +04:00
|
|
|
.bdrv_refresh_limits = &raw_refresh_limits,
|
2013-08-21 14:41:22 +04:00
|
|
|
.bdrv_is_inserted = &raw_is_inserted,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_media_changed = &raw_media_changed,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_eject = &raw_eject,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_lock_medium = &raw_lock_medium,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_ioctl = &raw_ioctl,
|
|
|
|
.bdrv_aio_ioctl = &raw_aio_ioctl,
|
2014-06-05 13:21:03 +04:00
|
|
|
.create_opts = &raw_create_opts,
|
2013-08-21 14:41:22 +04:00
|
|
|
.bdrv_has_zero_init = &raw_has_zero_init
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void bdrv_raw_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
bdrv_register(&bdrv_raw);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block_init(bdrv_raw_init);
|