qemu/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py

621 lines
23 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

# Functional test that boots known good tuxboot images the same way
# that tuxrun (www.tuxrun.org) does. This tool is used by things like
# the LKFT project to run regression tests on kernels.
#
# Copyright (c) 2023 Linaro Ltd.
#
# Author:
# Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
#
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
import os
import time
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py test-case. The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: With boot_linux.py ------------------ lines......: 13.8% (58006 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7675 of 36993 functions) branches...: 9.2% (22146 of 240611 branches) Without boot_linux.py (without this patch changes) -------------------------------------------------- lines......: 11.9% (50174 of 420997 lines) functions..: 18.8% (6947 of 36993 functions) branches...: 7.4% (17580 of 239017 branches) Without boot_linux.py (with this patch changes) ----------------------------------------------- lines......: 13.8% (58287 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7640 of 36993 functions) branches...: 8.4% (20223 of 240611 branches) Rebased on Alex Benee's testing/next branch: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/tree/testing/next Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230424092249.58552-13-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2023-04-24 12:22:43 +03:00
import tempfile
from avocado import skip, skipUnless
from avocado_qemu import QemuSystemTest
from avocado_qemu import exec_command, exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern
from avocado_qemu import wait_for_console_pattern
from avocado.utils import process
from avocado.utils.path import find_command
class TuxRunBaselineTest(QemuSystemTest):
"""
:avocado: tags=accel:tcg
"""
KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE = 'printk.time=0'
# Tests are ~10-40s, allow for --debug/--enable-gcov overhead
timeout = 100
def get_tag(self, tagname, default=None):
"""
Get the metadata tag or return the default.
"""
utag = self._get_unique_tag_val(tagname)
print(f"{tagname}/{default} -> {utag}")
if utag:
return utag
return default
def setUp(self):
super().setUp()
# We need zstd for all the tuxrun tests
# See https://github.com/avocado-framework/avocado/issues/5609
zstd = find_command('zstd', False)
if zstd is False:
self.cancel('Could not find "zstd", which is required to '
'decompress rootfs')
self.zstd = zstd
# Process the TuxRun specific tags, most machines work with
# reasonable defaults but we sometimes need to tweak the
# config. To avoid open coding everything we store all these
# details in the metadata for each test.
# The tuxboot tag matches the root directory
self.tuxboot = self.get_tag('tuxboot')
# Most Linux's use ttyS0 for their serial port
self.console = self.get_tag('console', "ttyS0")
# Does the machine shutdown QEMU nicely on "halt"
self.shutdown = self.get_tag('shutdown')
# The name of the kernel Image file
self.image = self.get_tag('image', "Image")
self.root = self.get_tag('root', "vda")
# Occasionally we need extra devices to hook things up
self.extradev = self.get_tag('extradev')
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py test-case. The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: With boot_linux.py ------------------ lines......: 13.8% (58006 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7675 of 36993 functions) branches...: 9.2% (22146 of 240611 branches) Without boot_linux.py (without this patch changes) -------------------------------------------------- lines......: 11.9% (50174 of 420997 lines) functions..: 18.8% (6947 of 36993 functions) branches...: 7.4% (17580 of 239017 branches) Without boot_linux.py (with this patch changes) ----------------------------------------------- lines......: 13.8% (58287 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7640 of 36993 functions) branches...: 8.4% (20223 of 240611 branches) Rebased on Alex Benee's testing/next branch: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/tree/testing/next Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230424092249.58552-13-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2023-04-24 12:22:43 +03:00
self.qemu_img = super().get_qemu_img()
def wait_for_console_pattern(self, success_message, vm=None):
wait_for_console_pattern(self, success_message,
failure_message='Kernel panic - not syncing',
vm=vm)
def fetch_tuxrun_assets(self, csums=None, dt=None):
"""
Fetch the TuxBoot assets. They are stored in a standard way so we
use the per-test tags to fetch details.
"""
base_url = f"https://storage.tuxboot.com/20230331/{self.tuxboot}/"
# empty hash if we weren't passed one
csums = {} if csums is None else csums
ksum = csums.get(self.image, None)
isum = csums.get("rootfs.ext4.zst", None)
kernel_image = self.fetch_asset(base_url + self.image,
asset_hash = ksum,
algorithm = "sha256")
disk_image_zst = self.fetch_asset(base_url + "rootfs.ext4.zst",
asset_hash = isum,
algorithm = "sha256")
cmd = f"{self.zstd} -d {disk_image_zst} -o {self.workdir}/rootfs.ext4"
process.run(cmd)
if dt:
dsum = csums.get(dt, None)
dtb = self.fetch_asset(base_url + dt,
asset_hash = dsum,
algorithm = "sha256")
else:
dtb = None
return (kernel_image, self.workdir + "/rootfs.ext4", dtb)
def prepare_run(self, kernel, disk, drive, dtb=None, console_index=0):
"""
Setup to run and add the common parameters to the system
"""
self.vm.set_console(console_index=console_index)
# all block devices are raw ext4's
blockdev = "driver=raw,file.driver=file," \
+ f"file.filename={disk},node-name=hd0"
kcmd_line = self.KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE
kcmd_line += f" root=/dev/{self.root}"
kcmd_line += f" console={self.console}"
self.vm.add_args('-kernel', kernel,
'-append', kcmd_line,
'-blockdev', blockdev)
# Sometimes we need extra devices attached
if self.extradev:
self.vm.add_args('-device', self.extradev)
self.vm.add_args('-device',
f"{drive},drive=hd0")
# Some machines need an explicit DTB
if dtb:
self.vm.add_args('-dtb', dtb)
def run_tuxtest_tests(self, haltmsg):
"""
Wait for the system to boot up, wait for the login prompt and
then do a few things on the console. Trigger a shutdown and
wait to exit cleanly.
"""
self.wait_for_console_pattern("Welcome to TuxTest")
time.sleep(0.2)
exec_command(self, 'root')
time.sleep(0.2)
exec_command(self, 'cat /proc/interrupts')
time.sleep(0.1)
exec_command(self, 'cat /proc/self/maps')
time.sleep(0.1)
exec_command(self, 'uname -a')
time.sleep(0.1)
exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern(self, 'halt', haltmsg)
# Wait for VM to shut down gracefully if it can
if self.shutdown == "nowait":
self.vm.shutdown()
else:
self.vm.wait()
def common_tuxrun(self,
csums=None,
dt=None,
drive="virtio-blk-device",
haltmsg="reboot: System halted",
console_index=0):
"""
Common path for LKFT tests. Unless we need to do something
special with the command line we can process most things using
the tag metadata.
"""
(kernel, disk, dtb) = self.fetch_tuxrun_assets(csums, dt)
self.prepare_run(kernel, disk, drive, dtb, console_index)
self.vm.launch()
self.run_tuxtest_tests(haltmsg)
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py test-case. The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: With boot_linux.py ------------------ lines......: 13.8% (58006 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7675 of 36993 functions) branches...: 9.2% (22146 of 240611 branches) Without boot_linux.py (without this patch changes) -------------------------------------------------- lines......: 11.9% (50174 of 420997 lines) functions..: 18.8% (6947 of 36993 functions) branches...: 7.4% (17580 of 239017 branches) Without boot_linux.py (with this patch changes) ----------------------------------------------- lines......: 13.8% (58287 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7640 of 36993 functions) branches...: 8.4% (20223 of 240611 branches) Rebased on Alex Benee's testing/next branch: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/tree/testing/next Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230424092249.58552-13-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2023-04-24 12:22:43 +03:00
def ppc64_common_tuxrun(self, sums, prefix):
# add device args to command line.
self.require_netdev('user')
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py test-case. The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: With boot_linux.py ------------------ lines......: 13.8% (58006 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7675 of 36993 functions) branches...: 9.2% (22146 of 240611 branches) Without boot_linux.py (without this patch changes) -------------------------------------------------- lines......: 11.9% (50174 of 420997 lines) functions..: 18.8% (6947 of 36993 functions) branches...: 7.4% (17580 of 239017 branches) Without boot_linux.py (with this patch changes) ----------------------------------------------- lines......: 13.8% (58287 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7640 of 36993 functions) branches...: 8.4% (20223 of 240611 branches) Rebased on Alex Benee's testing/next branch: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/tree/testing/next Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230424092249.58552-13-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2023-04-24 12:22:43 +03:00
self.vm.add_args('-netdev', 'user,id=vnet,hostfwd=:127.0.0.1:0-:22',
'-device', 'virtio-net,netdev=vnet')
self.vm.add_args('-netdev', '{"type":"user","id":"hostnet0"}',
'-device', '{"driver":"virtio-net-pci","netdev":'
'"hostnet0","id":"net0","mac":"52:54:00:4c:e3:86",'
'"bus":"pci.0","addr":"0x9"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"qemu-xhci","p2":15,"p3":15,'
'"id":"usb","bus":"pci.0","addr":"0x2"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"virtio-scsi-pci","id":"scsi0"'
',"bus":"pci.0","addr":"0x3"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"virtio-serial-pci","id":'
'"virtio-serial0","bus":"pci.0","addr":"0x4"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"scsi-cd","bus":"scsi0.0"'
',"channel":0,"scsi-id":0,"lun":0,"device_id":'
'"drive-scsi0-0-0-0","id":"scsi0-0-0-0"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"virtio-balloon-pci",'
'"id":"balloon0","bus":"pci.0","addr":"0x6"}')
self.vm.add_args('-audiodev', '{"id":"audio1","driver":"none"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"usb-tablet","id":"input0"'
',"bus":"usb.0","port":"1"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"usb-kbd","id":"input1"'
',"bus":"usb.0","port":"2"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"VGA","id":"video0",'
'"vgamem_mb":16,"bus":"pci.0","addr":"0x7"}')
self.vm.add_args('-object', '{"qom-type":"rng-random","id":"objrng0"'
',"filename":"/dev/urandom"}',
'-device', '{"driver":"virtio-rng-pci","rng":"objrng0"'
',"id":"rng0","bus":"pci.0","addr":"0x8"}')
self.vm.add_args('-object', '{"qom-type":"cryptodev-backend-builtin",'
'"id":"objcrypto0","queues":1}',
'-device', '{"driver":"virtio-crypto-pci",'
'"cryptodev":"objcrypto0","id":"crypto0","bus"'
':"pci.0","addr":"0xa"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"spapr-pci-host-bridge"'
',"index":1,"id":"pci.1"}')
self.vm.add_args('-device', '{"driver":"spapr-vscsi","id":"scsi1"'
',"reg":12288}')
self.vm.add_args('-m', '2G,slots=32,maxmem=4G',
'-object', 'memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=1G',
'-device', 'pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=ram1')
# Create a temporary qcow2 and launch the test-case
with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(prefix=prefix,
suffix='.qcow2') as qcow2:
process.run(self.qemu_img + ' create -f qcow2 ' +
qcow2.name + ' 1G')
self.vm.add_args('-drive', 'file=' + qcow2.name +
',format=qcow2,if=none,id='
'drive-virtio-disk1',
'-device', 'virtio-blk-pci,bus=pci.0,'
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py test-case. The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: With boot_linux.py ------------------ lines......: 13.8% (58006 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7675 of 36993 functions) branches...: 9.2% (22146 of 240611 branches) Without boot_linux.py (without this patch changes) -------------------------------------------------- lines......: 11.9% (50174 of 420997 lines) functions..: 18.8% (6947 of 36993 functions) branches...: 7.4% (17580 of 239017 branches) Without boot_linux.py (with this patch changes) ----------------------------------------------- lines......: 13.8% (58287 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7640 of 36993 functions) branches...: 8.4% (20223 of 240611 branches) Rebased on Alex Benee's testing/next branch: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/tree/testing/next Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230424092249.58552-13-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2023-04-24 12:22:43 +03:00
'addr=0xb,drive=drive-virtio-disk1,id=virtio-disk1'
',bootindex=2')
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums, drive="scsi-hd")
#
# The tests themselves. The configuration is derived from how
# tuxrun invokes qemu (with minor tweaks like using -blockdev
# consistently). The tuxrun equivalent is something like:
#
# tuxrun --device qemu-{ARCH} \
# --kernel https://storage.tuxboot.com/{TUXBOOT}/{IMAGE}
#
def test_arm64(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:aarch64
:avocado: tags=cpu:cortex-a57
:avocado: tags=machine:virt
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:arm64
:avocado: tags=console:ttyAMA0
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = {"Image" :
"ce95a7101a5fecebe0fe630deee6bd97b32ba41bc8754090e9ad8961ea8674c7",
"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"bbd5ed4b9c7d3f4ca19ba71a323a843c6b585e880115df3b7765769dbd9dd061"}
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
def test_arm64be(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:aarch64
:avocado: tags=cpu:cortex-a57
:avocado: tags=endian:big
:avocado: tags=machine:virt
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:arm64be
:avocado: tags=console:ttyAMA0
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "Image" :
"e0df4425eb2cd9ea9a283e808037f805641c65d8fcecc8f6407d8f4f339561b4",
"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"e6ffd8813c8a335bc15728f2835f90539c84be7f8f5f691a8b01451b47fb4bd7"}
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
def test_armv5(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:arm
:avocado: tags=cpu:arm926
:avocado: tags=machine:versatilepb
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:armv5
:avocado: tags=image:zImage
:avocado: tags=console:ttyAMA0
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"17177afa74e7294da0642861f08c88ca3c836764299a54bf6d1ce276cb9712a5",
"versatile-pb.dtb" :
"0bc0c0b0858cefd3c32b385c0d66d97142ded29472a496f4f490e42fc7615b25",
"zImage" :
"c95af2f27647c12265d75e9df44c22ff5228c59855f54aaa70f41ec2842e3a4d" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums,
drive="virtio-blk-pci",
dt="versatile-pb.dtb")
def test_armv7(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:arm
:avocado: tags=cpu:cortex-a15
:avocado: tags=machine:virt
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:armv7
:avocado: tags=image:zImage
:avocado: tags=console:ttyAMA0
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"ab1fbbeaddda1ffdd45c9405a28cd5370c20f23a7cbc809cc90dc9f243a8eb5a",
"zImage" :
"4c7a22e9f15875bec06bd2a29d822496571eb297d4f22694099ffcdb19077572" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
def test_armv7be(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:arm
:avocado: tags=cpu:cortex-a15
:avocado: tags=endian:big
:avocado: tags=machine:virt
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:armv7be
:avocado: tags=image:zImage
:avocado: tags=console:ttyAMA0
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = {"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"42ed46dd2d59986206c5b1f6cf35eab58fe3fd20c96b41aaa16b32f3f90a9835",
"zImage" :
"7facc62082b57af12015b08f7fdbaf2f123ba07a478367853ae12b219afc9f2f" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
def test_i386(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:i386
:avocado: tags=cpu:coreduo
:avocado: tags=machine:q35
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:i386
:avocado: tags=image:bzImage
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = {"bzImage" :
"a3e5b32a354729e65910f5a1ffcda7c14a6c12a55e8213fb86e277f1b76ed956",
"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"f15e66b2bf673a210ec2a4b2e744a80530b36289e04f5388aab812b97f69754a" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums, drive="virtio-blk-pci")
def test_mips32(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:mips
:avocado: tags=machine:malta
:avocado: tags=cpu:mips32r6-generic
:avocado: tags=endian:big
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:mips32
:avocado: tags=image:vmlinux
:avocado: tags=root:sda
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"fc3da0b4c2f38d74c6d705123bb0f633c76ed953128f9d0859378c328a6d11a0",
"vmlinux" :
"bfd2172f8b17fb32970ca0c8c58f59c5a4ca38aa5855d920be3a69b5d16e52f0" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums, drive="driver=ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0")
def test_mips32el(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:mipsel
:avocado: tags=machine:malta
:avocado: tags=cpu:mips32r6-generic
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:mips32el
:avocado: tags=image:vmlinux
:avocado: tags=root:sda
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"e799768e289fd69209c21f4dacffa11baea7543d5db101e8ce27e3bc2c41d90e",
"vmlinux" :
"8573867c68a8443db8de6d08bb33fb291c189ca2ca671471d3973a3e712096a3" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums, drive="driver=ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0")
def test_mips64(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:mips64
:avocado: tags=machine:malta
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:mips64
:avocado: tags=endian:big
:avocado: tags=image:vmlinux
:avocado: tags=root:sda
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"69d91eeb04df3d8d172922c6993bb37d4deeb6496def75d8580f6f9de3e431da",
"vmlinux" :
"09010e51e4b8bcbbd2494786ffb48eca78f228e96e5c5438344b0eac4029dc61" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums, drive="driver=ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0")
def test_mips64el(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:mips64el
:avocado: tags=machine:malta
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:mips64el
:avocado: tags=image:vmlinux
:avocado: tags=root:sda
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"fba585368f5915b1498ed081863474b2d7ec4e97cdd46d21bdcb2f9698f83de4",
"vmlinux" :
"d4e08965e2155c4cccce7c5f34d18fe34c636cda2f2c9844387d614950155266" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums, drive="driver=ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0")
def test_ppc32(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:ppc
:avocado: tags=machine:ppce500
:avocado: tags=cpu:e500mc
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:ppc32
:avocado: tags=image:uImage
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"8885b9d999cc24d679542a02e9b6aaf48f718f2050ece6b8347074b6ee41dd09",
"uImage" :
"1a68f74b860fda022fb12e03c5efece8c2b8b590d96cca37a8481a3ae0b3f81f" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums, drive="virtio-blk-pci")
def test_ppc64(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:ppc64
:avocado: tags=machine:pseries
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py test-case. The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: With boot_linux.py ------------------ lines......: 13.8% (58006 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7675 of 36993 functions) branches...: 9.2% (22146 of 240611 branches) Without boot_linux.py (without this patch changes) -------------------------------------------------- lines......: 11.9% (50174 of 420997 lines) functions..: 18.8% (6947 of 36993 functions) branches...: 7.4% (17580 of 239017 branches) Without boot_linux.py (with this patch changes) ----------------------------------------------- lines......: 13.8% (58287 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7640 of 36993 functions) branches...: 8.4% (20223 of 240611 branches) Rebased on Alex Benee's testing/next branch: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/tree/testing/next Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230424092249.58552-13-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2023-04-24 12:22:43 +03:00
:avocado: tags=cpu:POWER10
:avocado: tags=endian:big
:avocado: tags=console:hvc0
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:ppc64
:avocado: tags=image:vmlinux
:avocado: tags=extradev:driver=spapr-vscsi
:avocado: tags=root:sda
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"1d953e81a4379e537fc8e41e05a0a59d9b453eef97aa03d47866c6c45b00bdff",
"vmlinux" :
"f22a9b9e924174a4c199f4c7e5d91a2339fcfe51c6eafd0907dc3e09b64ab728" }
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py test-case. The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: With boot_linux.py ------------------ lines......: 13.8% (58006 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7675 of 36993 functions) branches...: 9.2% (22146 of 240611 branches) Without boot_linux.py (without this patch changes) -------------------------------------------------- lines......: 11.9% (50174 of 420997 lines) functions..: 18.8% (6947 of 36993 functions) branches...: 7.4% (17580 of 239017 branches) Without boot_linux.py (with this patch changes) ----------------------------------------------- lines......: 13.8% (58287 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7640 of 36993 functions) branches...: 8.4% (20223 of 240611 branches) Rebased on Alex Benee's testing/next branch: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/tree/testing/next Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230424092249.58552-13-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2023-04-24 12:22:43 +03:00
self.ppc64_common_tuxrun(sums, prefix='tuxrun_ppc64_')
def test_ppc64le(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:ppc64
:avocado: tags=machine:pseries
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py test-case. The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: With boot_linux.py ------------------ lines......: 13.8% (58006 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7675 of 36993 functions) branches...: 9.2% (22146 of 240611 branches) Without boot_linux.py (without this patch changes) -------------------------------------------------- lines......: 11.9% (50174 of 420997 lines) functions..: 18.8% (6947 of 36993 functions) branches...: 7.4% (17580 of 239017 branches) Without boot_linux.py (with this patch changes) ----------------------------------------------- lines......: 13.8% (58287 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7640 of 36993 functions) branches...: 8.4% (20223 of 240611 branches) Rebased on Alex Benee's testing/next branch: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/tree/testing/next Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230424092249.58552-13-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2023-04-24 12:22:43 +03:00
:avocado: tags=cpu:POWER10
:avocado: tags=console:hvc0
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:ppc64le
:avocado: tags=image:vmlinux
:avocado: tags=extradev:driver=spapr-vscsi
:avocado: tags=root:sda
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"b442678c93fb8abe1f7d3bfa20556488de6b475c22c8fed363f42cf81a0a3906",
"vmlinux" :
"979eb61b445a010fb13e2b927126991f8ceef9c590fa2be0996c00e293e80cf2" }
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64 Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4.fsf@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modified to make up this 2% code coverage. This patch attempts to achieve this 2% code coverage by adding various device command line arguments (to ./qemu-system-ppc64) in the tuxrun_baselines.py test-case. The code coverage report with boot_linux.py, without it and finally with these tuxrun_baselines.py changes is as follows: With boot_linux.py ------------------ lines......: 13.8% (58006 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7675 of 36993 functions) branches...: 9.2% (22146 of 240611 branches) Without boot_linux.py (without this patch changes) -------------------------------------------------- lines......: 11.9% (50174 of 420997 lines) functions..: 18.8% (6947 of 36993 functions) branches...: 7.4% (17580 of 239017 branches) Without boot_linux.py (with this patch changes) ----------------------------------------------- lines......: 13.8% (58287 of 420997 lines) functions..: 20.7% (7640 of 36993 functions) branches...: 8.4% (20223 of 240611 branches) Rebased on Alex Benee's testing/next branch: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/tree/testing/next Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230424041830.1275636-1-kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230424092249.58552-13-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2023-04-24 12:22:43 +03:00
self.ppc64_common_tuxrun(sums, prefix='tuxrun_ppc64le_')
def test_riscv32(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:riscv32
:avocado: tags=machine:virt
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:riscv32
"""
sums = { "Image" :
"89599407d7334de629a40e7ad6503c73670359eb5f5ae9d686353a3d6deccbd5",
"fw_jump.elf" :
"f2ef28a0b77826f79d085d3e4aa686f1159b315eff9099a37046b18936676985",
"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"7168d296d0283238ea73cd5a775b3dd608e55e04c7b92b76ecce31bb13108cba" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
def test_riscv64(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:riscv64
:avocado: tags=machine:virt
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:riscv64
"""
sums = { "Image" :
"cd634badc65e52fb63465ec99e309c0de0369f0841b7d9486f9729e119bac25e",
"fw_jump.elf" :
"6e3373abcab4305fe151b564a4c71110d833c21f2c0a1753b7935459e36aedcf",
"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"b18e3a3bdf27be03da0b285e84cb71bf09eca071c3a087b42884b6982ed679eb" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
def test_riscv32_maxcpu(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:riscv32
:avocado: tags=machine:virt
:avocado: tags=cpu:max
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:riscv32
"""
sums = { "Image" :
"89599407d7334de629a40e7ad6503c73670359eb5f5ae9d686353a3d6deccbd5",
"fw_jump.elf" :
"f2ef28a0b77826f79d085d3e4aa686f1159b315eff9099a37046b18936676985",
"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"7168d296d0283238ea73cd5a775b3dd608e55e04c7b92b76ecce31bb13108cba" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
def test_riscv64_maxcpu(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:riscv64
:avocado: tags=machine:virt
:avocado: tags=cpu:max
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:riscv64
"""
sums = { "Image" :
"cd634badc65e52fb63465ec99e309c0de0369f0841b7d9486f9729e119bac25e",
"fw_jump.elf" :
"6e3373abcab4305fe151b564a4c71110d833c21f2c0a1753b7935459e36aedcf",
"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"b18e3a3bdf27be03da0b285e84cb71bf09eca071c3a087b42884b6982ed679eb" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
def test_s390(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:s390x
:avocado: tags=endian:big
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:s390
:avocado: tags=image:bzImage
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "bzImage" :
"0414e98dd1c3dafff8496c9cd9c28a5f8d04553bb5ba37e906a812b48d442ef0",
"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"88c37c32276677f873a25ab9ec6247895b8e3e6f8259134de2a616080b8ab3fc" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums,
drive="virtio-blk-ccw",
haltmsg="Requesting system halt")
# Note: some segfaults caused by unaligned userspace access
@skipUnless(os.getenv('QEMU_TEST_FLAKY_TESTS'), 'Test is unstable on GitLab')
def test_sh4(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:sh4
:avocado: tags=machine:r2d
:avocado: tags=cpu:sh7785
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:sh4
:avocado: tags=image:zImage
:avocado: tags=root:sda
:avocado: tags=console:ttySC1
:avocado: tags=flaky
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"3592a7a3d5a641e8b9821449e77bc43c9904a56c30d45da0694349cfd86743fd",
"zImage" :
"29d9b2aba604a0f53a5dc3b5d0f2b8e35d497de1129f8ee5139eb6fdf0db692f" }
# The test is currently too unstable to do much in userspace
# so we skip common_tuxrun and do a minimal boot and shutdown.
(kernel, disk, dtb) = self.fetch_tuxrun_assets(csums=sums)
# the console comes on the second serial port
self.prepare_run(kernel, disk,
"driver=ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0",
console_index=1)
self.vm.launch()
self.wait_for_console_pattern("Welcome to TuxTest")
time.sleep(0.1)
exec_command(self, 'root')
time.sleep(0.1)
exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern(self, 'halt',
"reboot: System halted")
def test_sparc64(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:sparc64
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:sparc64
:avocado: tags=image:vmlinux
:avocado: tags=root:sda
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"ad2f1dc436ab51583543d25d2c210cab478645d47078d30d129a66ab0e281d76",
"vmlinux" :
"e34313e4325ff21deaa3d38a502aa09a373ef62b9bd4d7f8f29388b688225c55" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums, drive="driver=ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0")
def test_x86_64(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:x86_64
:avocado: tags=machine:q35
:avocado: tags=cpu:Nehalem
:avocado: tags=tuxboot:x86_64
:avocado: tags=image:bzImage
:avocado: tags=root:sda
:avocado: tags=shutdown:nowait
"""
sums = { "bzImage" :
"2bc7480a669ee9b6b82500a236aba0c54233debe98cb968268fa230f52f03461",
"rootfs.ext4.zst" :
"b72ac729769b8f51c6dffb221113c9a063c774dbe1d66af30eb593c4e9999b4b" }
self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums,
drive="driver=ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0")