2020-08-03 16:34:40 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUMA mechanics for sPAPR (pseries machines)
|
|
|
|
============================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUMA in sPAPR works different than the System Locality Distance
|
|
|
|
Information Table (SLIT) in ACPI. The logic is explained in the LOPAPR
|
|
|
|
1.1 chapter 15, "Non Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) Option". This
|
|
|
|
document aims to complement this specification, providing details
|
|
|
|
of the elements that impacts how QEMU views NUMA in pseries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associativity and ibm,associativity property
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associativity is defined as a group of platform resources that has
|
|
|
|
similar mean performance (or in our context here, distance) relative to
|
|
|
|
everyone else outside of the group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The format of the ibm,associativity property varies with the value of
|
|
|
|
bit 0 of byte 5 of the ibm,architecture-vec-5 property. The format with
|
|
|
|
bit 0 equal to zero is deprecated. The current format, with the bit 0
|
|
|
|
with the value of one, makes ibm,associativity property represent the
|
|
|
|
physical hierarchy of the platform, as one or more lists that starts
|
|
|
|
with the highest level grouping up to the smallest. Considering the
|
|
|
|
following topology:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mem M1 ---- Proc P1 |
|
|
|
|
----------------- | Socket S1 ---|
|
|
|
|
chip C1 | |
|
|
|
|
| HW module 1 (MOD1)
|
|
|
|
Mem M2 ---- Proc P2 | |
|
|
|
|
----------------- | Socket S2 ---|
|
|
|
|
chip C2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ibm,associativity property for the processors would be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* P1: {MOD1, S1, C1, P1}
|
|
|
|
* P2: {MOD1, S2, C2, P2}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each allocable resource has an ibm,associativity property. The LOPAPR
|
|
|
|
specification allows multiple lists to be present in this property,
|
|
|
|
considering that the same resource can have multiple connections to the
|
|
|
|
platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative Performance Distance and ibm,associativity-reference-points
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ibm,associativity-reference-points property is an array that is used
|
|
|
|
to define the relevant performance/distance related boundaries, defining
|
|
|
|
the NUMA levels for the platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The definition of its elements also varies with the value of bit 0 of byte 5
|
|
|
|
of the ibm,architecture-vec-5 property. The format with bit 0 equal to zero
|
|
|
|
is also deprecated. With the current format, each integer of the
|
|
|
|
ibm,associativity-reference-points represents an 1 based ordinal index (i.e.
|
|
|
|
the first element is 1) of the ibm,associativity array. The first
|
|
|
|
boundary is the most significant to application performance, followed by
|
|
|
|
less significant boundaries. Allocated resources that belongs to the
|
|
|
|
same performance boundaries are expected to have relative NUMA distance
|
|
|
|
that matches the relevancy of the boundary itself. Resources that belongs
|
|
|
|
to the same first boundary will have the shortest distance from each
|
|
|
|
other. Subsequent boundaries represents greater distances and degraded
|
|
|
|
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the previous example, the following setting reference points defines
|
|
|
|
three NUMA levels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ibm,associativity-reference-points = {0x3, 0x2, 0x1}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first NUMA level (0x3) is interpreted as the third element of each
|
|
|
|
ibm,associativity array, the second level is the second element and
|
|
|
|
the third level is the first element. Let's also consider that elements
|
|
|
|
belonging to the first NUMA level have distance equal to 10 from each
|
|
|
|
other, and each NUMA level doubles the distance from the previous. This
|
|
|
|
means that the second would be 20 and the third level 40. For the P1 and
|
|
|
|
P2 processors, we would have the following NUMA levels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ibm,associativity-reference-points = {0x3, 0x2, 0x1}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* P1: associativity{MOD1, S1, C1, P1}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First NUMA level (0x3) => associativity[2] = C1
|
|
|
|
Second NUMA level (0x2) => associativity[1] = S1
|
|
|
|
Third NUMA level (0x1) => associativity[0] = MOD1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* P2: associativity{MOD1, S2, C2, P2}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First NUMA level (0x3) => associativity[2] = C2
|
|
|
|
Second NUMA level (0x2) => associativity[1] = S2
|
|
|
|
Third NUMA level (0x1) => associativity[0] = MOD1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 and P2 have the same third NUMA level, MOD1: Distance between them = 40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changing the ibm,associativity-reference-points array changes the performance
|
|
|
|
distance attributes for the same associativity arrays, as the following
|
|
|
|
example illustrates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ibm,associativity-reference-points = {0x2}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* P1: associativity{MOD1, S1, C1, P1}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First NUMA level (0x2) => associativity[1] = S1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* P2: associativity{MOD1, S2, C2, P2}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First NUMA level (0x2) => associativity[1] = S2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 and P2 does not have a common performance boundary. Since this is a one level
|
|
|
|
NUMA configuration, distance between them is one boundary above the first
|
|
|
|
level, 20.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a hypothetical platform where all resources inside the same hardware module
|
|
|
|
is considered to be on the same performance boundary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ibm,associativity-reference-points = {0x1}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* P1: associativity{MOD1, S1, C1, P1}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First NUMA level (0x1) => associativity[0] = MOD0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* P2: associativity{MOD1, S2, C2, P2}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First NUMA level (0x1) => associativity[0] = MOD0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 and P2 belongs to the same first order boundary. The distance between then
|
|
|
|
is 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How the pseries Linux guest calculates NUMA distances
|
|
|
|
=====================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another key difference between ACPI SLIT and the LOPAPR regarding NUMA is
|
|
|
|
how the distances are expressed. The SLIT table provides the NUMA distance
|
|
|
|
value between the relevant resources. LOPAPR does not provide a standard
|
|
|
|
way to calculate it. We have the ibm,associativity for each resource, which
|
|
|
|
provides a common-performance hierarchy, and the ibm,associativity-reference-points
|
|
|
|
array that tells which level of associativity is considered to be relevant
|
|
|
|
or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The result is that each OS is free to implement and to interpret the distance
|
|
|
|
as it sees fit. For the pseries Linux guest, each level of NUMA duplicates
|
|
|
|
the distance of the previous level, and the maximum amount of levels is
|
|
|
|
limited to MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS = 4 (from arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c in the
|
|
|
|
kernel tree). This results in the following distances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* both resources in the first NUMA level: 10
|
|
|
|
* resources one NUMA level apart: 20
|
|
|
|
* resources two NUMA levels apart: 40
|
|
|
|
* resources three NUMA levels apart: 80
|
|
|
|
* resources four NUMA levels apart: 160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-07 20:28:49 +03:00
|
|
|
pseries NUMA mechanics
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starting in QEMU 5.2, the pseries machine considers user input when setting NUMA
|
|
|
|
topology of the guest. The overall design is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ibm,associativity-reference-points is set to {0x4, 0x3, 0x2, 0x1}, allowing
|
|
|
|
for 4 distinct NUMA distance values based on the NUMA levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ibm,max-associativity-domains supports multiple associativity domains in all
|
|
|
|
NUMA levels, granting user flexibility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ibm,associativity for all resources varies with user input
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These changes are only effective for pseries-5.2 and newer machines that are
|
|
|
|
created with more than one NUMA node (disconsidering NUMA nodes created by
|
|
|
|
the machine itself, e.g. NVLink 2 GPUs). The now legacy support has been
|
|
|
|
around for such a long time, with users seeing NUMA distances 10 and 40
|
|
|
|
(and 80 if using NVLink2 GPUs), and there is no need to disrupt the
|
|
|
|
existing experience of those guests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To bring the user experience x86 users have when tuning up NUMA, we had
|
|
|
|
to operate under the current pseries Linux kernel logic described in
|
|
|
|
`How the pseries Linux guest calculates NUMA distances`_. The result
|
|
|
|
is that we needed to translate NUMA distance user input to pseries
|
|
|
|
Linux kernel input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translating user distance to kernel distance
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User input for NUMA distance can vary from 10 to 254. We need to translate
|
|
|
|
that to the values that the Linux kernel operates on (10, 20, 40, 80, 160).
|
|
|
|
This is how it is being done:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* user distance 11 to 30 will be interpreted as 20
|
|
|
|
* user distance 31 to 60 will be interpreted as 40
|
|
|
|
* user distance 61 to 120 will be interpreted as 80
|
|
|
|
* user distance 121 and beyond will be interpreted as 160
|
|
|
|
* user distance 10 stays 10
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-17 22:34:48 +03:00
|
|
|
The reasoning behind this approximation is to avoid any round up to the local
|
2020-10-07 20:28:49 +03:00
|
|
|
distance (10), keeping it exclusive to the 4th NUMA level (which is still
|
|
|
|
exclusive to the node_id). All other ranges were chosen under the developer
|
|
|
|
discretion of what would be (somewhat) sensible considering the user input.
|
|
|
|
Any other strategy can be used here, but in the end the reality is that we'll
|
|
|
|
have to accept that a large array of values will be translated to the same
|
|
|
|
NUMA topology in the guest, e.g. this user input:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 1 2
|
|
|
|
0 10 31 120
|
|
|
|
1 31 10 30
|
|
|
|
2 120 30 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And this other user input:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 1 2
|
|
|
|
0 10 60 61
|
|
|
|
1 60 10 11
|
|
|
|
2 61 11 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Will both be translated to the same values internally:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 1 2
|
|
|
|
0 10 40 80
|
|
|
|
1 40 10 20
|
|
|
|
2 80 20 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Users are encouraged to use only the kernel values in the NUMA definition to
|
|
|
|
avoid being taken by surprise with that the guest is actually seeing in the
|
|
|
|
topology. There are enough potential surprises that are inherent to the
|
|
|
|
associativity domain assignment process, discussed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How associativity domains are assigned
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOPAPR allows more than one associativity array (or 'string') per allocated
|
|
|
|
resource. This would be used to represent that the resource has multiple
|
|
|
|
connections with the board, and then the operational system, when deciding
|
|
|
|
NUMA distancing, should consider the associativity information that provides
|
|
|
|
the shortest distance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The spapr implementation does not support multiple associativity arrays per
|
|
|
|
resource, neither does the pseries Linux kernel. We'll have to represent the
|
|
|
|
NUMA topology using one associativity per resource, which means that choices
|
|
|
|
and compromises are going to be made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider the following NUMA topology entered by user input:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 1 2 3
|
|
|
|
0 10 40 20 40
|
|
|
|
1 40 10 80 40
|
|
|
|
2 20 80 10 20
|
|
|
|
3 40 40 20 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All the associativity arrays are initialized with NUMA id in all associativity
|
|
|
|
domains:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* node 0: 0 0 0 0
|
|
|
|
* node 1: 1 1 1 1
|
|
|
|
* node 2: 2 2 2 2
|
|
|
|
* node 3: 3 3 3 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Honoring just the relative distances of node 0 to every other node, we find the
|
|
|
|
NUMA level matches (considering the reference points {0x4, 0x3, 0x2, 0x1}) for
|
|
|
|
each distance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* distance from 0 to 1 is 40 (no match at 0x4 and 0x3, will match
|
|
|
|
at 0x2)
|
|
|
|
* distance from 0 to 2 is 20 (no match at 0x4, will match at 0x3)
|
|
|
|
* distance from 0 to 3 is 40 (no match at 0x4 and 0x3, will match
|
|
|
|
at 0x2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We'll copy the associativity domains of node 0 to all other nodes, based on
|
|
|
|
the NUMA level matches. Between 0 and 1, a match in 0x2, we'll also copy
|
|
|
|
the domains 0x2 and 0x1 from 0 to 1 as well. This will give us:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* node 0: 0 0 0 0
|
|
|
|
* node 1: 0 0 1 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doing the same to node 2 and node 3, these are the associativity arrays
|
|
|
|
after considering all matches with node 0:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* node 0: 0 0 0 0
|
|
|
|
* node 1: 0 0 1 1
|
|
|
|
* node 2: 0 0 0 2
|
|
|
|
* node 3: 0 0 3 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The distances related to node 0 are accounted for. For node 1, and keeping
|
|
|
|
in mind that we don't need to revisit node 0 again, the distance from
|
|
|
|
node 1 to 2 is 80, matching at 0x1, and distance from 1 to 3 is 40,
|
|
|
|
match in 0x2. Repeating the same logic of copying all domains up to
|
|
|
|
the NUMA level match:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* node 0: 0 0 0 0
|
|
|
|
* node 1: 1 0 1 1
|
|
|
|
* node 2: 1 0 0 2
|
|
|
|
* node 3: 1 0 3 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the last step we will analyze just nodes 2 and 3. The desired distance
|
|
|
|
between 2 and 3 is 20, i.e. a match in 0x3:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* node 0: 0 0 0 0
|
|
|
|
* node 1: 1 0 1 1
|
|
|
|
* node 2: 1 0 0 2
|
|
|
|
* node 3: 1 0 0 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The kernel will read these arrays and will calculate the following NUMA topology for
|
|
|
|
the guest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 1 2 3
|
|
|
|
0 10 40 20 20
|
|
|
|
1 40 10 40 40
|
|
|
|
2 20 40 10 20
|
|
|
|
3 20 40 20 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that this is not what the user wanted - the desired distance between
|
|
|
|
0 and 3 is 40, we calculated it as 20. This is what the current logic and
|
|
|
|
implementation constraints of the kernel and QEMU will provide inside the
|
|
|
|
LOPAPR specification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Users are welcome to use this knowledge and experiment with the input to get
|
|
|
|
the NUMA topology they want, or as closer as they want. The important thing
|
|
|
|
is to keep expectations up to par with what we are capable of provide at this
|
|
|
|
moment: an approximation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limitations of the implementation
|
2020-08-03 16:34:40 +03:00
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-07 20:28:49 +03:00
|
|
|
As mentioned above, the pSeries NUMA distance logic is, in fact, a way to approximate
|
|
|
|
user choice. The Linux kernel, and PAPR itself, does not provide QEMU with the ways
|
|
|
|
to fully map user input to actual NUMA distance the guest will use. These limitations
|
|
|
|
creates two notable limitations in our support:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Asymmetrical topologies aren't supported. We only support NUMA topologies where
|
|
|
|
the distance from node A to B is always the same as B to A. We do not support
|
|
|
|
any A-B pair where the distance back and forth is asymmetric. For example, the
|
|
|
|
following topology isn't supported and the pSeries guest will not boot with this
|
|
|
|
user input:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 1
|
|
|
|
0 10 40
|
|
|
|
1 20 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 'non-transitive' topologies will be poorly translated to the guest. This is the
|
|
|
|
kind of topology where the distance from a node A to B is X, B to C is X, but
|
|
|
|
the distance A to C is not X. E.g.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 1 2 3
|
|
|
|
0 10 20 20 40
|
|
|
|
1 20 10 80 40
|
|
|
|
2 20 80 10 20
|
|
|
|
3 40 40 20 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the example above, distance 0 to 2 is 20, 2 to 3 is 20, but 0 to 3 is 40.
|
|
|
|
The kernel will always match with the shortest associativity domain possible,
|
|
|
|
and we're attempting to retain the previous established relations between the
|
|
|
|
nodes. This means that a distance equal to 20 between nodes 0 and 2 and the
|
|
|
|
same distance 20 between nodes 2 and 3 will cause the distance between 0 and 3
|
|
|
|
to also be 20.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy (5.1 and older) pseries NUMA mechanics
|
|
|
|
=============================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In short, we can summarize the NUMA distances seem in pseries Linux guests, using
|
|
|
|
QEMU up to 5.1, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* local distance, i.e. the distance of the resource to its own NUMA node: 10
|
|
|
|
* if it's a NVLink GPU device, distance: 80
|
|
|
|
* every other resource, distance: 40
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-03 16:34:40 +03:00
|
|
|
The way the pseries Linux guest calculates NUMA distances has a direct effect
|
|
|
|
on what QEMU users can expect when doing NUMA tuning. As of QEMU 5.1, this is
|
|
|
|
the default ibm,associativity-reference-points being used in the pseries
|
|
|
|
machine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ibm,associativity-reference-points = {0x4, 0x4, 0x2}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first and second level are equal, 0x4, and a third one was added in
|
|
|
|
commit a6030d7e0b35 exclusively for NVLink GPUs support. This means that
|
|
|
|
regardless of how the ibm,associativity properties are being created in
|
|
|
|
the device tree, the pseries Linux guest will only recognize three scenarios
|
|
|
|
as far as NUMA distance goes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* if the resources belongs to the same first NUMA level = 10
|
|
|
|
* second level is skipped since it's equal to the first
|
|
|
|
* all resources that aren't a NVLink GPU, it is guaranteed that they will belong
|
|
|
|
to the same third NUMA level, having distance = 40
|
|
|
|
* for NVLink GPUs, distance = 80 from everything else
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This also means that user input in QEMU command line does not change the
|
|
|
|
NUMA distancing inside the guest for the pseries machine.
|