mirrors/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
postgres/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
Neil Conway dfcf99bf93 Fix a bunch of bad grammar in the docs: "<link>, which see for more 
information" is un-good English.
2007-05-15 19:43:51 +00:00

2933 lines
99 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml,v 1.75 2007/05/15 19:43:50 neilc Exp $ -->
<chapter id="ddl">
<title>Data Definition</title>
<para>
This chapter covers how one creates the database structures that
will hold one's data. In a relational database, the raw data is
stored in tables, so the majority of this chapter is devoted to
explaining how tables are created and modified and what features are
available to control what data is stored in the tables.
Subsequently, we discuss how tables can be organized into
schemas, and how privileges can be assigned to tables. Finally,
we will briefly look at other features that affect the data storage,
such as inheritance, views, functions, and triggers.
</para>
<sect1 id="ddl-basics">
<title>Table Basics</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-basics">
<primary>table</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>row</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>column</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
A table in a relational database is much like a table on paper: It
consists of rows and columns. The number and order of the columns
is fixed, and each column has a name. The number of rows is
variable &mdash; it reflects how much data is stored at a given moment.
SQL does not make any guarantees about the order of the rows in a
table. When a table is read, the rows will appear in random order,
unless sorting is explicitly requested. This is covered in <xref
linkend="queries">. Furthermore, SQL does not assign unique
identifiers to rows, so it is possible to have several completely
identical rows in a table. This is a consequence of the
mathematical model that underlies SQL but is usually not desirable.
Later in this chapter we will see how to deal with this issue.
</para>
<para>
Each column has a data type. The data type constrains the set of
possible values that can be assigned to a column and assigns
semantics to the data stored in the column so that it can be used
for computations. For instance, a column declared to be of a
numerical type will not accept arbitrary text strings, and the data
stored in such a column can be used for mathematical computations.
By contrast, a column declared to be of a character string type
will accept almost any kind of data but it does not lend itself to
mathematical calculations, although other operations such as string
concatenation are available.
</para>
<para>
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> includes a sizable set of
built-in data types that fit many applications. Users can also
define their own data types. Most built-in data types have obvious
names and semantics, so we defer a detailed explanation to <xref
linkend="datatype">. Some of the frequently used data types are
<type>integer</type> for whole numbers, <type>numeric</type> for
possibly fractional numbers, <type>text</type> for character
strings, <type>date</type> for dates, <type>time</type> for
time-of-day values, and <type>timestamp</type> for values
containing both date and time.
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>table</primary>
<secondary>creating</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To create a table, you use the aptly named <xref
linkend="sql-createtable" endterm="sql-createtable-title"> command.
In this command you specify at least a name for the new table, the
names of the columns and the data type of each column. For
example:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE my_first_table (
first_column text,
second_column integer
);
</programlisting>
This creates a table named <literal>my_first_table</literal> with
two columns. The first column is named
<literal>first_column</literal> and has a data type of
<type>text</type>; the second column has the name
<literal>second_column</literal> and the type <type>integer</type>.
The table and column names follow the identifier syntax explained
in <xref linkend="sql-syntax-identifiers">. The type names are
usually also identifiers, but there are some exceptions. Note that the
column list is comma-separated and surrounded by parentheses.
</para>
<para>
Of course, the previous example was heavily contrived. Normally,
you would give names to your tables and columns that convey what
kind of data they store. So let's look at a more realistic
example:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer,
name text,
price numeric
);
</programlisting>
(The <type>numeric</type> type can store fractional components, as
would be typical of monetary amounts.)
</para>
<tip>
<para>
When you create many interrelated tables it is wise to choose a
consistent naming pattern for the tables and columns. For
instance, there is a choice of using singular or plural nouns for
table names, both of which are favored by some theorist or other.
</para>
</tip>
<para>
There is a limit on how many columns a table can contain.
Depending on the column types, it is between 250 and 1600.
However, defining a table with anywhere near this many columns is
highly unusual and often a questionable design.
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>table</primary>
<secondary>removing</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
If you no longer need a table, you can remove it using the <xref
linkend="sql-droptable" endterm="sql-droptable-title"> command.
For example:
<programlisting>
DROP TABLE my_first_table;
DROP TABLE products;
</programlisting>
Attempting to drop a table that does not exist is an error.
Nevertheless, it is common in SQL script files to unconditionally
try to drop each table before creating it, ignoring any error
messages, so that the script works whether or not the table exists.
(If you like, you can use the <literal>DROP TABLE IF EXISTS</> variant
to avoid the error messages, but this is not standard SQL.)
</para>
<para>
If you need to modify a table that already exists look into <xref
linkend="ddl-alter"> later in this chapter.
</para>
<para>
With the tools discussed so far you can create fully functional
tables. The remainder of this chapter is concerned with adding
features to the table definition to ensure data integrity,
security, or convenience. If you are eager to fill your tables with
data now you can skip ahead to <xref linkend="dml"> and read the
rest of this chapter later.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-default">
<title>Default Values</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-default">
<primary>default value</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
A column can be assigned a default value. When a new row is
created and no values are specified for some of the columns, those
columns will be filled with their respective default values. A
data manipulation command can also request explicitly that a column
be set to its default value, without having to know what that value is.
(Details about data manipulation commands are in <xref linkend="dml">.)
</para>
<para>
<indexterm><primary>null value</primary><secondary>default value</secondary></indexterm>
If no default value is declared explicitly, the default value is the
null value. This usually makes sense because a null value can
be considered to represent unknown data.
</para>
<para>
In a table definition, default values are listed after the column
data type. For example:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer,
name text,
price numeric <emphasis>DEFAULT 9.99</emphasis>
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
The default value can be an expression, which will be
evaluated whenever the default value is inserted
(<emphasis>not</emphasis> when the table is created). A common example
is that a <type>timestamp</type> column can have a default of <literal>now()</>,
so that it gets set to the time of row insertion. Another common
example is generating a <quote>serial number</> for each row.
In <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> this is typically done by
something like:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer <emphasis>DEFAULT nextval('products_product_no_seq')</emphasis>,
...
);
</programlisting>
where the <literal>nextval()</> function supplies successive values
from a <firstterm>sequence object</> (see <xref
linkend="functions-sequence">). This arrangement is sufficiently common
that there's a special shorthand for it:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no <emphasis>SERIAL</emphasis>,
...
);
</programlisting>
The <literal>SERIAL</> shorthand is discussed further in <xref
linkend="datatype-serial">.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-constraints">
<title>Constraints</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-constraints">
<primary>constraint</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
Data types are a way to limit the kind of data that can be stored
in a table. For many applications, however, the constraint they
provide is too coarse. For example, a column containing a product
price should probably only accept positive values. But there is no
standard data type that accepts only positive numbers. Another issue is
that you might want to constrain column data with respect to other
columns or rows. For example, in a table containing product
information, there should be only one row for each product number.
</para>
<para>
To that end, SQL allows you to define constraints on columns and
tables. Constraints give you as much control over the data in your
tables as you wish. If a user attempts to store data in a column
that would violate a constraint, an error is raised. This applies
even if the value came from the default value definition.
</para>
<sect2>
<title>Check Constraints</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>check constraint</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint</primary>
<secondary>check</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
A check constraint is the most generic constraint type. It allows
you to specify that the value in a certain column must satisfy a
Boolean (truth-value) expression. For instance, to require positive
product prices, you could use:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer,
name text,
price numeric <emphasis>CHECK (price &gt; 0)</emphasis>
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
As you see, the constraint definition comes after the data type,
just like default value definitions. Default values and
constraints can be listed in any order. A check constraint
consists of the key word <literal>CHECK</literal> followed by an
expression in parentheses. The check constraint expression should
involve the column thus constrained, otherwise the constraint
would not make too much sense.
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint</primary>
<secondary>name</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
You can also give the constraint a separate name. This clarifies
error messages and allows you to refer to the constraint when you
need to change it. The syntax is:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer,
name text,
price numeric <emphasis>CONSTRAINT positive_price</emphasis> CHECK (price &gt; 0)
);
</programlisting>
So, to specify a named constraint, use the key word
<literal>CONSTRAINT</literal> followed by an identifier followed
by the constraint definition. (If you don't specify a constraint
name in this way, the system chooses a name for you.)
</para>
<para>
A check constraint can also refer to several columns. Say you
store a regular price and a discounted price, and you want to
ensure that the discounted price is lower than the regular price:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer,
name text,
price numeric CHECK (price &gt; 0),
discounted_price numeric CHECK (discounted_price &gt; 0),
<emphasis>CHECK (price &gt; discounted_price)</emphasis>
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
The first two constraints should look familiar. The third one
uses a new syntax. It is not attached to a particular column,
instead it appears as a separate item in the comma-separated
column list. Column definitions and these constraint
definitions can be listed in mixed order.
</para>
<para>
We say that the first two constraints are column constraints, whereas the
third one is a table constraint because it is written separately
from any one column definition. Column constraints can also be
written as table constraints, while the reverse is not necessarily
possible, since a column constraint is supposed to refer to only the
column it is attached to. (<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> doesn't
enforce that rule, but you should follow it if you want your table
definitions to work with other database systems.) The above example could
also be written as:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer,
name text,
price numeric,
CHECK (price &gt; 0),
discounted_price numeric,
CHECK (discounted_price &gt; 0),
CHECK (price &gt; discounted_price)
);
</programlisting>
or even:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer,
name text,
price numeric CHECK (price &gt; 0),
discounted_price numeric,
CHECK (discounted_price &gt; 0 AND price &gt; discounted_price)
);
</programlisting>
It's a matter of taste.
</para>
<para>
Names can be assigned to table constraints in just the same way as
for column constraints:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer,
name text,
price numeric,
CHECK (price &gt; 0),
discounted_price numeric,
CHECK (discounted_price &gt; 0),
<emphasis>CONSTRAINT valid_discount</> CHECK (price &gt; discounted_price)
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>null value</primary>
<secondary sortas="check constraints">with check constraints</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
It should be noted that a check constraint is satisfied if the
check expression evaluates to true or the null value. Since most
expressions will evaluate to the null value if any operand is null,
they will not prevent null values in the constrained columns. To
ensure that a column does not contain null values, the not-null
constraint described in the next section can be used.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Not-Null Constraints</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>not-null constraint</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint</primary>
<secondary>NOT NULL</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
A not-null constraint simply specifies that a column must not
assume the null value. A syntax example:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer <emphasis>NOT NULL</emphasis>,
name text <emphasis>NOT NULL</emphasis>,
price numeric
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
A not-null constraint is always written as a column constraint. A
not-null constraint is functionally equivalent to creating a check
constraint <literal>CHECK (<replaceable>column_name</replaceable>
IS NOT NULL)</literal>, but in
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> creating an explicit
not-null constraint is more efficient. The drawback is that you
cannot give explicit names to not-null constraints created this
way.
</para>
<para>
Of course, a column can have more than one constraint. Just write
the constraints one after another:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer NOT NULL,
name text NOT NULL,
price numeric NOT NULL CHECK (price &gt; 0)
);
</programlisting>
The order doesn't matter. It does not necessarily determine in which
order the constraints are checked.
</para>
<para>
The <literal>NOT NULL</literal> constraint has an inverse: the
<literal>NULL</literal> constraint. This does not mean that the
column must be null, which would surely be useless. Instead, this
simply selects the default behavior that the column might be null.
The <literal>NULL</literal> constraint is not present in the SQL
standard and should not be used in portable applications. (It was
only added to <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> to be
compatible with some other database systems.) Some users, however,
like it because it makes it easy to toggle the constraint in a
script file. For example, you could start with:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer NULL,
name text NULL,
price numeric NULL
);
</programlisting>
and then insert the <literal>NOT</literal> key word where desired.
</para>
<tip>
<para>
In most database designs the majority of columns should be marked
not null.
</para>
</tip>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Unique Constraints</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>unique constraint</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint</primary>
<secondary>unique</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
Unique constraints ensure that the data contained in a column or a
group of columns is unique with respect to all the rows in the
table. The syntax is:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer <emphasis>UNIQUE</emphasis>,
name text,
price numeric
);
</programlisting>
when written as a column constraint, and:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer,
name text,
price numeric,
<emphasis>UNIQUE (product_no)</emphasis>
);
</programlisting>
when written as a table constraint.
</para>
<para>
If a unique constraint refers to a group of columns, the columns
are listed separated by commas:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE example (
a integer,
b integer,
c integer,
<emphasis>UNIQUE (a, c)</emphasis>
);
</programlisting>
This specifies that the combination of values in the indicated columns
is unique across the whole table, though any one of the columns
need not be (and ordinarily isn't) unique.
</para>
<para>
You can assign your own name for a unique constraint, in the usual way:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer <emphasis>CONSTRAINT must_be_different</emphasis> UNIQUE,
name text,
price numeric
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>null value</primary>
<secondary sortas="unique constraints">with unique constraints</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
In general, a unique constraint is violated when there are two or
more rows in the table where the values of all of the
columns included in the constraint are equal.
However, two null values are not considered equal in this
comparison. That means even in the presence of a
unique constraint it is possible to store duplicate
rows that contain a null value in at least one of the constrained
columns. This behavior conforms to the SQL standard, but we have
heard that other SQL databases might not follow this rule. So be
careful when developing applications that are intended to be
portable.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Primary Keys</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>primary key</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint</primary>
<secondary>primary key</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
Technically, a primary key constraint is simply a combination of a
unique constraint and a not-null constraint. So, the following
two table definitions accept the same data:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer UNIQUE NOT NULL,
name text,
price numeric
);
</programlisting>
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer <emphasis>PRIMARY KEY</emphasis>,
name text,
price numeric
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
Primary keys can also constrain more than one column; the syntax
is similar to unique constraints:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE example (
a integer,
b integer,
c integer,
<emphasis>PRIMARY KEY (a, c)</emphasis>
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
A primary key indicates that a column or group of columns can be
used as a unique identifier for rows in the table. (This is a
direct consequence of the definition of a primary key. Note that
a unique constraint does not, by itself, provide a unique identifier
because it does not exclude null values.) This is useful both for
documentation purposes and for client applications. For example,
a GUI application that allows modifying row values probably needs
to know the primary key of a table to be able to identify rows
uniquely.
</para>
<para>
A table can have at most one primary key. (There can be any number
of unique and not-null constraints, which are functionally the same
thing, but only one can be identified as the primary key.)
Relational database theory
dictates that every table must have a primary key. This rule is
not enforced by <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, but it is
usually best to follow it.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-constraints-fk">
<title>Foreign Keys</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>foreign key</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint</primary>
<secondary>foreign key</secondary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>referential integrity</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
A foreign key constraint specifies that the values in a column (or
a group of columns) must match the values appearing in some row
of another table.
We say this maintains the <firstterm>referential
integrity</firstterm> between two related tables.
</para>
<para>
Say you have the product table that we have used several times already:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer PRIMARY KEY,
name text,
price numeric
);
</programlisting>
Let's also assume you have a table storing orders of those
products. We want to ensure that the orders table only contains
orders of products that actually exist. So we define a foreign
key constraint in the orders table that references the products
table:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE orders (
order_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
product_no integer <emphasis>REFERENCES products (product_no)</emphasis>,
quantity integer
);
</programlisting>
Now it is impossible to create orders with
<structfield>product_no</structfield> entries that do not appear in the
products table.
</para>
<para>
We say that in this situation the orders table is the
<firstterm>referencing</firstterm> table and the products table is
the <firstterm>referenced</firstterm> table. Similarly, there are
referencing and referenced columns.
</para>
<para>
You can also shorten the above command to:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE orders (
order_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
product_no integer <emphasis>REFERENCES products</emphasis>,
quantity integer
);
</programlisting>
because in absence of a column list the primary key of the
referenced table is used as the referenced column(s).
</para>
<para>
A foreign key can also constrain and reference a group of columns.
As usual, it then needs to be written in table constraint form.
Here is a contrived syntax example:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE t1 (
a integer PRIMARY KEY,
b integer,
c integer,
<emphasis>FOREIGN KEY (b, c) REFERENCES other_table (c1, c2)</emphasis>
);
</programlisting>
Of course, the number and type of the constrained columns need to
match the number and type of the referenced columns.
</para>
<para>
You can assign your own name for a foreign key constraint,
in the usual way.
</para>
<para>
A table can contain more than one foreign key constraint. This is
used to implement many-to-many relationships between tables. Say
you have tables about products and orders, but now you want to
allow one order to contain possibly many products (which the
structure above did not allow). You could use this table structure:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer PRIMARY KEY,
name text,
price numeric
);
CREATE TABLE orders (
order_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
shipping_address text,
...
);
CREATE TABLE order_items (
product_no integer REFERENCES products,
order_id integer REFERENCES orders,
quantity integer,
PRIMARY KEY (product_no, order_id)
);
</programlisting>
Notice that the primary key overlaps with the foreign keys in
the last table.
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>CASCADE</primary>
<secondary>foreign key action</secondary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>RESTRICT</primary>
<secondary>foreign key action</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
We know that the foreign keys disallow creation of orders that
do not relate to any products. But what if a product is removed
after an order is created that references it? SQL allows you to
handle that as well. Intuitively, we have a few options:
<itemizedlist spacing="compact">
<listitem><para>Disallow deleting a referenced product</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>Delete the orders as well</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>Something else?</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
To illustrate this, let's implement the following policy on the
many-to-many relationship example above: when someone wants to
remove a product that is still referenced by an order (via
<literal>order_items</literal>), we disallow it. If someone
removes an order, the order items are removed as well:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products (
product_no integer PRIMARY KEY,
name text,
price numeric
);
CREATE TABLE orders (
order_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
shipping_address text,
...
);
CREATE TABLE order_items (
product_no integer REFERENCES products <emphasis>ON DELETE RESTRICT</emphasis>,
order_id integer REFERENCES orders <emphasis>ON DELETE CASCADE</emphasis>,
quantity integer,
PRIMARY KEY (product_no, order_id)
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
Restricting and cascading deletes are the two most common options.
<literal>RESTRICT</literal> prevents deletion of a
referenced row. <literal>NO ACTION</literal> means that if any
referencing rows still exist when the constraint is checked, an error
is raised; this is the default behavior if you do not specify anything.
(The essential difference between these two choices is that
<literal>NO ACTION</literal> allows the check to be deferred until
later in the transaction, whereas <literal>RESTRICT</literal> does not.)
<literal>CASCADE</> specifies that when a referenced row is deleted,
row(s) referencing it should be automatically deleted as well.
There are two other options:
<literal>SET NULL</literal> and <literal>SET DEFAULT</literal>.
These cause the referencing columns to be set to nulls or default
values, respectively, when the referenced row is deleted.
Note that these do not excuse you from observing any constraints.
For example, if an action specifies <literal>SET DEFAULT</literal>
but the default value would not satisfy the foreign key, the
operation will fail.
</para>
<para>
Analogous to <literal>ON DELETE</literal> there is also
<literal>ON UPDATE</literal> which is invoked when a referenced
column is changed (updated). The possible actions are the same.
</para>
<para>
More information about updating and deleting data is in <xref
linkend="dml">.
</para>
<para>
Finally, we should mention that a foreign key must reference
columns that either are a primary key or form a unique constraint.
If the foreign key references a unique constraint, there are some
additional possibilities regarding how null values are matched.
These are explained in the reference documentation for
<xref linkend="sql-createtable" endterm="sql-createtable-title">.
</para>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-system-columns">
<title>System Columns</title>
<para>
Every table has several <firstterm>system columns</> that are
implicitly defined by the system. Therefore, these names cannot be
used as names of user-defined columns. (Note that these
restrictions are separate from whether the name is a key word or
not; quoting a name will not allow you to escape these
restrictions.) You do not really need to be concerned about these
columns, just know they exist.
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>column</primary>
<secondary>system column</secondary>
</indexterm>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term><structfield>oid</></term>
<listitem>
<para>
<indexterm>
<primary>OID</primary>
<secondary>column</secondary>
</indexterm>
The object identifier (object ID) of a row. This column is only
present if the table was created using <literal>WITH
OIDS</literal>, or if the <xref linkend="guc-default-with-oids">
configuration variable was set at the time. This column is of type
<type>oid</type> (same name as the column); see <xref
linkend="datatype-oid"> for more information about the type.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><structfield>tableoid</></term>
<listitem>
<indexterm>
<primary>tableoid</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
The OID of the table containing this row. This column is
particularly handy for queries that select from inheritance
hierarchies (see <xref linkend="ddl-inherit">), since without it,
it's difficult to tell which individual table a row came from. The
<structfield>tableoid</structfield> can be joined against the
<structfield>oid</structfield> column of
<structname>pg_class</structname> to obtain the table name.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><structfield>xmin</></term>
<listitem>
<indexterm>
<primary>xmin</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
The identity (transaction ID) of the inserting transaction for
this row version. (A row version is an individual state of a
row; each update of a row creates a new row version for the same
logical row.)
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><structfield>cmin</></term>
<listitem>
<indexterm>
<primary>cmin</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
The command identifier (starting at zero) within the inserting
transaction.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><structfield>xmax</></term>
<listitem>
<indexterm>
<primary>xmax</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
The identity (transaction ID) of the deleting transaction, or
zero for an undeleted row version. It is possible for this column to
be nonzero in a visible row version. That usually indicates that the
deleting transaction hasn't committed yet, or that an attempted
deletion was rolled back.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><structfield>cmax</></term>
<listitem>
<indexterm>
<primary>cmax</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
The command identifier within the deleting transaction, or zero.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><structfield>ctid</></term>
<listitem>
<indexterm>
<primary>ctid</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
The physical location of the row version within its table. Note that
although the <structfield>ctid</structfield> can be used to
locate the row version very quickly, a row's
<structfield>ctid</structfield> will change if it is
updated or moved by <command>VACUUM FULL</>. Therefore
<structfield>ctid</structfield> is useless as a long-term row
identifier. The OID, or even better a user-defined serial
number, should be used to identify logical rows.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
<para>
OIDs are 32-bit quantities and are assigned from a single
cluster-wide counter. In a large or long-lived database, it is
possible for the counter to wrap around. Hence, it is bad
practice to assume that OIDs are unique, unless you take steps to
ensure that this is the case. If you need to identify the rows in
a table, using a sequence generator is strongly recommended.
However, OIDs can be used as well, provided that a few additional
precautions are taken:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
A unique constraint should be created on the OID column of each
table for which the OID will be used to identify rows. When such
a unique constraint (or unique index) exists, the system takes
care not to generate an OID matching an already-existing row.
(Of course, this is only possible if the table contains fewer
than 2<superscript>32</> (4 billion) rows, and in practice the
table size had better be much less than that, or performance
might suffer.)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
OIDs should never be assumed to be unique across tables; use
the combination of <structfield>tableoid</> and row OID if you
need a database-wide identifier.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Of course, the tables in question must be created <literal>WITH
OIDS</literal>. As of <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> 8.1,
<literal>WITHOUT OIDS</> is the default.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
Transaction identifiers are also 32-bit quantities. In a
long-lived database it is possible for transaction IDs to wrap
around. This is not a fatal problem given appropriate maintenance
procedures; see <xref linkend="maintenance"> for details. It is
unwise, however, to depend on the uniqueness of transaction IDs
over the long term (more than one billion transactions).
</para>
<para>
Command
identifiers are also 32-bit quantities. This creates a hard limit
of 2<superscript>32</> (4 billion) <acronym>SQL</acronym> commands
within a single transaction. In practice this limit is not a
problem &mdash; note that the limit is on number of
<acronym>SQL</acronym> commands, not number of rows processed.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-alter">
<title>Modifying Tables</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-alter">
<primary>table</primary>
<secondary>modifying</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
When you create a table and you realize that you made a mistake, or
the requirements of the application change, then you can drop the
table and create it again. But this is not a convenient option if
the table is already filled with data, or if the table is
referenced by other database objects (for instance a foreign key
constraint). Therefore <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
provides a family of commands to make modifications to existing
tables. Note that this is conceptually distinct from altering
the data contained in the table: here we are interested in altering
the definition, or structure, of the table.
</para>
<para>
You can
<itemizedlist spacing="compact">
<listitem>
<para>Add columns,</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Remove columns,</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Add constraints,</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Remove constraints,</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Change default values,</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Change column data types,</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Rename columns,</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Rename tables.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
All these actions are performed using the
<xref linkend="sql-altertable" endterm="sql-altertable-title">
command, whose reference page contains details beyond those given
here.
</para>
<sect2>
<title>Adding a Column</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>column</primary>
<secondary>adding</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To add a column, use a command like this:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products ADD COLUMN description text;
</programlisting>
The new column is initially filled with whatever default
value is given (null if you don't specify a <literal>DEFAULT</> clause).
</para>
<para>
You can also define constraints on the column at the same time,
using the usual syntax:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products ADD COLUMN description text CHECK (description &lt;&gt; '');
</programlisting>
In fact all the options that can be applied to a column description
in <command>CREATE TABLE</> can be used here. Keep in mind however
that the default value must satisfy the given constraints, or the
<literal>ADD</> will fail. Alternatively, you can add
constraints later (see below) after you've filled in the new column
correctly.
</para>
<tip>
<para>
Adding a column with a default requires updating each row of the
table (to store the new column value). However, if no default is
specified, <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> is able to avoid
the physical update. So if you intend to fill the column with
mostly nondefault values, it's best to add the column with no default,
insert the correct values using <command>UPDATE</>, and then add any
desired default as described below.
</para>
</tip>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Removing a Column</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>column</primary>
<secondary>removing</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To remove a column, use a command like this:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products DROP COLUMN description;
</programlisting>
Whatever data was in the column disappears. Table constraints involving
the column are dropped, too. However, if the column is referenced by a
foreign key constraint of another table,
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> will not silently drop that
constraint. You can authorize dropping everything that depends on
the column by adding <literal>CASCADE</>:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products DROP COLUMN description CASCADE;
</programlisting>
See <xref linkend="ddl-depend"> for a description of the general
mechanism behind this.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Adding a Constraint</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint</primary>
<secondary>adding</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To add a constraint, the table constraint syntax is used. For example:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products ADD CHECK (name &lt;&gt; '');
ALTER TABLE products ADD CONSTRAINT some_name UNIQUE (product_no);
ALTER TABLE products ADD FOREIGN KEY (product_group_id) REFERENCES product_groups;
</programlisting>
To add a not-null constraint, which cannot be written as a table
constraint, use this syntax:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products ALTER COLUMN product_no SET NOT NULL;
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
The constraint will be checked immediately, so the table data must
satisfy the constraint before it can be added.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Removing a Constraint</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint</primary>
<secondary>removing</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To remove a constraint you need to know its name. If you gave it
a name then that's easy. Otherwise the system assigned a
generated name, which you need to find out. The
<application>psql</application> command <literal>\d
<replaceable>tablename</replaceable></literal> can be helpful
here; other interfaces might also provide a way to inspect table
details. Then the command is:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products DROP CONSTRAINT some_name;
</programlisting>
(If you are dealing with a generated constraint name like <literal>$2</>,
don't forget that you'll need to double-quote it to make it a valid
identifier.)
</para>
<para>
As with dropping a column, you need to add <literal>CASCADE</> if you
want to drop a constraint that something else depends on. An example
is that a foreign key constraint depends on a unique or primary key
constraint on the referenced column(s).
</para>
<para>
This works the same for all constraint types except not-null
constraints. To drop a not null constraint use:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products ALTER COLUMN product_no DROP NOT NULL;
</programlisting>
(Recall that not-null constraints do not have names.)
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Changing a Column's Default Value</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>default value</primary>
<secondary>changing</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To set a new default for a column, use a command like this:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products ALTER COLUMN price SET DEFAULT 7.77;
</programlisting>
Note that this doesn't affect any existing rows in the table, it
just changes the default for future <command>INSERT</> commands.
</para>
<para>
To remove any default value, use:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products ALTER COLUMN price DROP DEFAULT;
</programlisting>
This is effectively the same as setting the default to null.
As a consequence, it is not an error
to drop a default where one hadn't been defined, because the
default is implicitly the null value.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Changing a Column's Data Type</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>column data type</primary>
<secondary>changing</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To convert a column to a different data type, use a command like this:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products ALTER COLUMN price TYPE numeric(10,2);
</programlisting>
This will succeed only if each existing entry in the column can be
converted to the new type by an implicit cast. If a more complex
conversion is needed, you can add a <literal>USING</> clause that
specifies how to compute the new values from the old.
</para>
<para>
<productname>PostgreSQL</> will attempt to convert the column's
default value (if any) to the new type, as well as any constraints
that involve the column. But these conversions might fail, or might
produce surprising results. It's often best to drop any constraints
on the column before altering its type, and then add back suitably
modified constraints afterwards.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Renaming a Column</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>column</primary>
<secondary>renaming</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To rename a column:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products RENAME COLUMN product_no TO product_number;
</programlisting>
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Renaming a Table</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>table</primary>
<secondary>renaming</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To rename a table:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE products RENAME TO items;
</programlisting>
</para>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-priv">
<title>Privileges</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-priv">
<primary>privilege</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>permission</primary>
<see>privilege</see>
</indexterm>
<para>
When you create a database object, you become its owner. By
default, only the owner of an object can do anything with the
object. In order to allow other users to use it,
<firstterm>privileges</firstterm> must be granted. (However,
users that have the superuser attribute can always
access any object.)
</para>
<para>
There are several different privileges: <literal>SELECT</>,
<literal>INSERT</>, <literal>UPDATE</>, <literal>DELETE</>,
<literal>REFERENCES</>, <literal>TRIGGER</>,
<literal>CREATE</>, <literal>CONNECT</>, <literal>TEMPORARY</>,
<literal>EXECUTE</>, and <literal>USAGE</>.
The privileges applicable to a particular
object vary depending on the object's type (table, function, etc).
For complete information on the different types of privileges
supported by <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, refer to the
<xref linkend="sql-grant" endterm="sql-grant-title"> reference
page. The following sections and chapters will also show you how
those privileges are used.
</para>
<para>
The right to modify or destroy an object is always the privilege of
the owner only.
</para>
<note>
<para>
To change the owner of a table, index, sequence, or view, use the
<xref linkend="sql-altertable" endterm="sql-altertable-title">
command. There are corresponding <literal>ALTER</> commands for
other object types.
</para>
</note>
<para>
To assign privileges, the <command>GRANT</command> command is
used. For example, if <literal>joe</literal> is an existing user, and
<literal>accounts</literal> is an existing table, the privilege to
update the table can be granted with:
<programlisting>
GRANT UPDATE ON accounts TO joe;
</programlisting>
Writing <literal>ALL</literal> in place of a specific privilege grants all
privileges that are relevant for the object type.
</para>
<para>
The special <quote>user</quote> name <literal>PUBLIC</literal> can
be used to grant a privilege to every user on the system. Also,
<quote>group</> roles can be set up to help manage privileges when
there are many users of a database &mdash; for details see
<xref linkend="user-manag">.
</para>
<para>
To revoke a privilege, use the fittingly named
<command>REVOKE</command> command:
<programlisting>
REVOKE ALL ON accounts FROM PUBLIC;
</programlisting>
The special privileges of the object owner (i.e., the right to do
<command>DROP</>, <command>GRANT</>, <command>REVOKE</>, etc.)
are always implicit in being the owner,
and cannot be granted or revoked. But the object owner can choose
to revoke his own ordinary privileges, for example to make a
table read-only for himself as well as others.
</para>
<para>
Ordinarily, only the object's owner (or a superuser) can grant or
revoke privileges on an object. However, it is possible to grant a
privilege <quote>with grant option</>, which gives the recipient
the right to grant it in turn to others. If the grant option is
subsequently revoked then all who received the privilege from that
recipient (directly or through a chain of grants) will lose the
privilege. For details see the <xref linkend="sql-grant"
endterm="sql-grant-title"> and <xref linkend="sql-revoke"
endterm="sql-revoke-title"> reference pages.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-schemas">
<title>Schemas</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-schemas">
<primary>schema</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
A <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> database cluster
contains one or more named databases. Users and groups of users are
shared across the entire cluster, but no other data is shared across
databases. Any given client connection to the server can access
only the data in a single database, the one specified in the connection
request.
</para>
<note>
<para>
Users of a cluster do not necessarily have the privilege to access every
database in the cluster. Sharing of user names means that there
cannot be different users named, say, <literal>joe</> in two databases
in the same cluster; but the system can be configured to allow
<literal>joe</> access to only some of the databases.
</para>
</note>
<para>
A database contains one or more named <firstterm>schemas</>, which
in turn contain tables. Schemas also contain other kinds of named
objects, including data types, functions, and operators. The same
object name can be used in different schemas without conflict; for
example, both <literal>schema1</> and <literal>myschema</> can
contain tables named <literal>mytable</>. Unlike databases,
schemas are not rigidly separated: a user can access objects in any
of the schemas in the database he is connected to, if he has
privileges to do so.
</para>
<para>
There are several reasons why one might want to use schemas:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
To allow many users to use one database without interfering with
each other.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
To organize database objects into logical groups to make them
more manageable.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Third-party applications can be put into separate schemas so
they cannot collide with the names of other objects.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
Schemas are analogous to directories at the operating system level,
except that schemas cannot be nested.
</para>
<sect2 id="ddl-schemas-create">
<title>Creating a Schema</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-schemas-create">
<primary>schema</primary>
<secondary>creating</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To create a schema, use the <xref linkend="sql-createschema"
endterm="sql-createschema-title"> command. Give the schema a name
of your choice. For example:
<programlisting>
CREATE SCHEMA myschema;
</programlisting>
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>qualified name</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>name</primary>
<secondary>qualified</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To create or access objects in a schema, write a
<firstterm>qualified name</> consisting of the schema name and
table name separated by a dot:
<synopsis>
<replaceable>schema</><literal>.</><replaceable>table</>
</synopsis>
This works anywhere a table name is expected, including the table
modification commands and the data access commands discussed in
the following chapters.
(For brevity we will speak of tables only, but the same ideas apply
to other kinds of named objects, such as types and functions.)
</para>
<para>
Actually, the even more general syntax
<synopsis>
<replaceable>database</><literal>.</><replaceable>schema</><literal>.</><replaceable>table</>
</synopsis>
can be used too, but at present this is just for <foreignphrase>pro
forma</> compliance with the SQL standard. If you write a database name,
it must be the same as the database you are connected to.
</para>
<para>
So to create a table in the new schema, use:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE myschema.mytable (
...
);
</programlisting>
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>schema</primary>
<secondary>removing</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To drop a schema if it's empty (all objects in it have been
dropped), use:
<programlisting>
DROP SCHEMA myschema;
</programlisting>
To drop a schema including all contained objects, use:
<programlisting>
DROP SCHEMA myschema CASCADE;
</programlisting>
See <xref linkend="ddl-depend"> for a description of the general
mechanism behind this.
</para>
<para>
Often you will want to create a schema owned by someone else
(since this is one of the ways to restrict the activities of your
users to well-defined namespaces). The syntax for that is:
<programlisting>
CREATE SCHEMA <replaceable>schemaname</replaceable> AUTHORIZATION <replaceable>username</replaceable>;
</programlisting>
You can even omit the schema name, in which case the schema name
will be the same as the user name. See <xref
linkend="ddl-schemas-patterns"> for how this can be useful.
</para>
<para>
Schema names beginning with <literal>pg_</> are reserved for
system purposes and cannot be created by users.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-schemas-public">
<title>The Public Schema</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-schemas-public">
<primary>schema</primary>
<secondary>public</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
In the previous sections we created tables without specifying any
schema names. By default, such tables (and other objects) are
automatically put into a schema named <quote>public</quote>. Every new
database contains such a schema. Thus, the following are equivalent:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE products ( ... );
</programlisting>
and:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE public.products ( ... );
</programlisting>
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-schemas-path">
<title>The Schema Search Path</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>search path</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>unqualified name</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>name</primary>
<secondary>unqualified</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
Qualified names are tedious to write, and it's often best not to
wire a particular schema name into applications anyway. Therefore
tables are often referred to by <firstterm>unqualified names</>,
which consist of just the table name. The system determines which table
is meant by following a <firstterm>search path</>, which is a list
of schemas to look in. The first matching table in the search path
is taken to be the one wanted. If there is no match in the search
path, an error is reported, even if matching table names exist
in other schemas in the database.
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>schema</primary>
<secondary>current</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
The first schema named in the search path is called the current schema.
Aside from being the first schema searched, it is also the schema in
which new tables will be created if the <command>CREATE TABLE</>
command does not specify a schema name.
</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>search_path</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
To show the current search path, use the following command:
<programlisting>
SHOW search_path;
</programlisting>
In the default setup this returns:
<screen>
search_path
--------------
"$user",public
</screen>
The first element specifies that a schema with the same name as
the current user is to be searched. If no such schema exists,
the entry is ignored. The second element refers to the
public schema that we have seen already.
</para>
<para>
The first schema in the search path that exists is the default
location for creating new objects. That is the reason that by
default objects are created in the public schema. When objects
are referenced in any other context without schema qualification
(table modification, data modification, or query commands) the
search path is traversed until a matching object is found.
Therefore, in the default configuration, any unqualified access
again can only refer to the public schema.
</para>
<para>
To put our new schema in the path, we use:
<programlisting>
SET search_path TO myschema,public;
</programlisting>
(We omit the <literal>$user</literal> here because we have no
immediate need for it.) And then we can access the table without
schema qualification:
<programlisting>
DROP TABLE mytable;
</programlisting>
Also, since <literal>myschema</literal> is the first element in
the path, new objects would by default be created in it.
</para>
<para>
We could also have written:
<programlisting>
SET search_path TO myschema;
</programlisting>
Then we no longer have access to the public schema without
explicit qualification. There is nothing special about the public
schema except that it exists by default. It can be dropped, too.
</para>
<para>
See also <xref linkend="functions-info"> for other ways to manipulate
the schema search path.
</para>
<para>
The search path works in the same way for data type names, function names,
and operator names as it does for table names. Data type and function
names can be qualified in exactly the same way as table names. If you
need to write a qualified operator name in an expression, there is a
special provision: you must write
<synopsis>
<literal>OPERATOR(</><replaceable>schema</><literal>.</><replaceable>operator</><literal>)</>
</synopsis>
This is needed to avoid syntactic ambiguity. An example is:
<programlisting>
SELECT 3 OPERATOR(pg_catalog.+) 4;
</programlisting>
In practice one usually relies on the search path for operators,
so as not to have to write anything so ugly as that.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-schemas-priv">
<title>Schemas and Privileges</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-schemas-priv">
<primary>privilege</primary>
<secondary sortas="schemas">for schemas</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
By default, users cannot access any objects in schemas they do not
own. To allow that, the owner of the schema needs to grant the
<literal>USAGE</literal> privilege on the schema. To allow users
to make use of the objects in the schema, additional privileges
might need to be granted, as appropriate for the object.
</para>
<para>
A user can also be allowed to create objects in someone else's
schema. To allow that, the <literal>CREATE</literal> privilege on
the schema needs to be granted. Note that by default, everyone
has <literal>CREATE</literal> and <literal>USAGE</literal> privileges on
the schema
<literal>public</literal>. This allows all users that are able to
connect to a given database to create objects in its
<literal>public</literal> schema. If you do
not want to allow that, you can revoke that privilege:
<programlisting>
REVOKE CREATE ON SCHEMA public FROM PUBLIC;
</programlisting>
(The first <quote>public</quote> is the schema, the second
<quote>public</quote> means <quote>every user</quote>. In the
first sense it is an identifier, in the second sense it is a
key word, hence the different capitalization; recall the
guidelines from <xref linkend="sql-syntax-identifiers">.)
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-schemas-catalog">
<title>The System Catalog Schema</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-schemas-catalog">
<primary>system catalog</primary>
<secondary>schema</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
In addition to <literal>public</> and user-created schemas, each
database contains a <literal>pg_catalog</> schema, which contains
the system tables and all the built-in data types, functions, and
operators. <literal>pg_catalog</> is always effectively part of
the search path. If it is not named explicitly in the path then
it is implicitly searched <emphasis>before</> searching the path's
schemas. This ensures that built-in names will always be
findable. However, you can explicitly place
<literal>pg_catalog</> at the end of your search path if you
prefer to have user-defined names override built-in names.
</para>
<para>
In <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> versions before 7.3,
table names beginning with <literal>pg_</> were reserved. This is
no longer true: you can create such a table name if you wish, in
any non-system schema. However, it's best to continue to avoid
such names, to ensure that you won't suffer a conflict if some
future version defines a system table named the same as your
table. (With the default search path, an unqualified reference to
your table name would be resolved as the system table instead.)
System tables will continue to follow the convention of having
names beginning with <literal>pg_</>, so that they will not
conflict with unqualified user-table names so long as users avoid
the <literal>pg_</> prefix.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-schemas-patterns">
<title>Usage Patterns</title>
<para>
Schemas can be used to organize your data in many ways. There are
a few usage patterns that are recommended and are easily supported by
the default configuration:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
If you do not create any schemas then all users access the
public schema implicitly. This simulates the situation where
schemas are not available at all. This setup is mainly
recommended when there is only a single user or a few cooperating
users in a database. This setup also allows smooth transition
from the non-schema-aware world.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
You can create a schema for each user with the same name as
that user. Recall that the default search path starts with
<literal>$user</literal>, which resolves to the user name.
Therefore, if each user has a separate schema, they access their
own schemas by default.
</para>
<para>
If you use this setup then you might also want to revoke access
to the public schema (or drop it altogether), so users are
truly constrained to their own schemas.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
To install shared applications (tables to be used by everyone,
additional functions provided by third parties, etc.), put them
into separate schemas. Remember to grant appropriate
privileges to allow the other users to access them. Users can
then refer to these additional objects by qualifying the names
with a schema name, or they can put the additional schemas into
their search path, as they choose.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-schemas-portability">
<title>Portability</title>
<para>
In the SQL standard, the notion of objects in the same schema
being owned by different users does not exist. Moreover, some
implementations do not allow you to create schemas that have a
different name than their owner. In fact, the concepts of schema
and user are nearly equivalent in a database system that
implements only the basic schema support specified in the
standard. Therefore, many users consider qualified names to
really consist of
<literal><replaceable>username</>.<replaceable>tablename</></literal>.
This is how <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> will effectively
behave if you create a per-user schema for every user.
</para>
<para>
Also, there is no concept of a <literal>public</> schema in the
SQL standard. For maximum conformance to the standard, you should
not use (perhaps even remove) the <literal>public</> schema.
</para>
<para>
Of course, some SQL database systems might not implement schemas
at all, or provide namespace support by allowing (possibly
limited) cross-database access. If you need to work with those
systems, then maximum portability would be achieved by not using
schemas at all.
</para>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-inherit">
<title>Inheritance</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>inheritance</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>table</primary>
<secondary>inheritance</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> implements table inheritance,
which can be a useful tool for database designers. (SQL:1999 and
later define a type inheritance feature, which differs in many
respects from the features described here.)
</para>
<para>
Let's start with an example: suppose we are trying to build a data
model for cities. Each state has many cities, but only one
capital. We want to be able to quickly retrieve the capital city
for any particular state. This can be done by creating two tables,
one for state capitals and one for cities that are not
capitals. However, what happens when we want to ask for data about
a city, regardless of whether it is a capital or not? The
inheritance feature can help to resolve this problem. We define the
<structname>capitals</structname> table so that it inherits from
<structname>cities</structname>:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE cities (
name text,
population float,
altitude int -- in feet
);
CREATE TABLE capitals (
state char(2)
) INHERITS (cities);
</programlisting>
In this case, the <structname>capitals</> table <firstterm>inherits</>
all the columns of its parent table, <structname>cities</>. State
capitals also have an extra column, <structfield>state</>, that shows
their state.
</para>
<para>
In <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, a table can inherit from
zero or more other tables, and a query can reference either all
rows of a table or all rows of a table plus all of its descendant tables.
The latter behavior is the default.
For example, the following query finds the names of all cities,
including state capitals, that are located at an altitude over
500 feet:
<programlisting>
SELECT name, altitude
FROM cities
WHERE altitude &gt; 500;
</programlisting>
Given the sample data from the <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
tutorial (see <xref linkend="tutorial-sql-intro">), this returns:
<programlisting>
name | altitude
-----------+----------
Las Vegas | 2174
Mariposa | 1953
Madison | 845
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
On the other hand, the following query finds all the cities that
are not state capitals and are situated at an altitude over 500 feet:
<programlisting>
SELECT name, altitude
FROM ONLY cities
WHERE altitude &gt; 500;
name | altitude
-----------+----------
Las Vegas | 2174
Mariposa | 1953
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
Here the <literal>ONLY</literal> keyword indicates that the query
should apply only to <structname>cities</structname>, and not any tables
below <structname>cities</structname> in the inheritance hierarchy. Many
of the commands that we have already discussed &mdash;
<command>SELECT</command>, <command>UPDATE</command> and
<command>DELETE</command> &mdash; support the
<literal>ONLY</literal> keyword.
</para>
<para>
In some cases you might wish to know which table a particular row
originated from. There is a system column called
<structfield>tableoid</structfield> in each table which can tell you the
originating table:
<programlisting>
SELECT c.tableoid, c.name, c.altitude
FROM cities c
WHERE c.altitude &gt; 500;
</programlisting>
which returns:
<programlisting>
tableoid | name | altitude
----------+-----------+----------
139793 | Las Vegas | 2174
139793 | Mariposa | 1953
139798 | Madison | 845
</programlisting>
(If you try to reproduce this example, you will probably get
different numeric OIDs.) By doing a join with
<structname>pg_class</> you can see the actual table names:
<programlisting>
SELECT p.relname, c.name, c.altitude
FROM cities c, pg_class p
WHERE c.altitude &gt; 500 and c.tableoid = p.oid;
</programlisting>
which returns:
<programlisting>
relname | name | altitude
----------+-----------+----------
cities | Las Vegas | 2174
cities | Mariposa | 1953
capitals | Madison | 845
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
Inheritance does not automatically propagate data from
<command>INSERT</command> or <command>COPY</command> commands to
other tables in the inheritance hierarchy. In our example, the
following <command>INSERT</command> statement will fail:
<programlisting>
INSERT INTO cities (name, population, altitude, state)
VALUES ('New York', NULL, NULL, 'NY');
</programlisting>
We might hope that the data would somehow be routed to the
<structname>capitals</structname> table, but this does not happen:
<command>INSERT</command> always inserts into exactly the table
specified. In some cases it is possible to redirect the insertion
using a rule (see <xref linkend="rules">). However that does not
help for the above case because the <structname>cities</> table
does not contain the column <structfield>state</>, and so the
command will be rejected before the rule can be applied.
</para>
<para>
All check constraints and not-null constraints on a parent table are
automatically inherited by its children. Other types of constraints
(unique, primary key, and foreign key constraints) are not inherited.
</para>
<para>
A table can inherit from more than one parent table, in which case it has
the union of the columns defined by the parent tables. Any columns
declared in the child table's definition are added to these. If the
same column name appears in multiple parent tables, or in both a parent
table and the child's definition, then these columns are <quote>merged</>
so that there is only one such column in the child table. To be merged,
columns must have the same data types, else an error is raised. The
merged column will have copies of all the check constraints coming from
any one of the column definitions it came from, and will be marked not-null
if any of them are.
</para>
<para>
Table inheritance is typically established when the child table is
created, using the <literal>INHERITS</> clause of the
<xref linkend="sql-createtable" endterm="sql-createtable-title">
statement.
Alternatively, a table which is already defined in a compatible way can
have a new parent relationship added, using the <literal>INHERIT</literal>
variant of <xref linkend="sql-altertable" endterm="sql-altertable-title">.
To do this the new child table must already include columns with
the same names and types as the columns of the parent. It must also include
check constraints with the same names and check expressions as those of the
parent. Similarly an inheritance link can be removed from a child using the
<literal>NO INHERIT</literal> variant of <command>ALTER TABLE</>.
Dynamically adding and removing inheritance links like this can be useful
when the inheritance relationship is being used for table
partitioning (see <xref linkend="ddl-partitioning">).
</para>
<para>
One convenient way to create a compatible table that will later be made
a new child is to use the <literal>LIKE</literal> clause in <command>CREATE
TABLE</command>. This creates a new table with the same columns as
the source table. If there are any <literal>CHECK</literal>
constraints defined on the source table, the <literal>INCLUDING
CONSTRAINTS</literal> option to <literal>LIKE</literal> should be
specified, as the new child must have constraints matching the parent
to be considered compatible.
</para>
<para>
A parent table cannot be dropped while any of its children remain. Neither
can columns of child tables be dropped or altered if they are inherited
from any parent tables. If you wish to remove a table and all of its
descendants, one easy way is to drop the parent table with the
<literal>CASCADE</literal> option.
</para>
<para>
<xref linkend="sql-altertable" endterm="sql-altertable-title"> will
propagate any changes in column data definitions and check
constraints down the inheritance hierarchy. Again, dropping
columns or constraints on parent tables is only possible when using
the <literal>CASCADE</literal> option. <command>ALTER
TABLE</command> follows the same rules for duplicate column merging
and rejection that apply during <command>CREATE TABLE</command>.
</para>
<sect2 id="ddl-inherit-caveats">
<title>Caveats</title>
<para>
Table access permissions are not automatically inherited. Therefore,
a user attempting to access a parent table must either have permissions
to do the operation on all its child tables as well, or must use the
<literal>ONLY</literal> notation. When adding a new child table to
an existing inheritance hierarchy, be careful to grant all the needed
permissions on it.
</para>
<para>
A serious limitation of the inheritance feature is that indexes (including
unique constraints) and foreign key constraints only apply to single
tables, not to their inheritance children. This is true on both the
referencing and referenced sides of a foreign key constraint. Thus,
in the terms of the above example:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
If we declared <structname>cities</>.<structfield>name</> to be
<literal>UNIQUE</> or a <literal>PRIMARY KEY</>, this would not stop the
<structname>capitals</> table from having rows with names duplicating
rows in <structname>cities</>. And those duplicate rows would by
default show up in queries from <structname>cities</>. In fact, by
default <structname>capitals</> would have no unique constraint at all,
and so could contain multiple rows with the same name.
You could add a unique constraint to <structname>capitals</>, but this
would not prevent duplication compared to <structname>cities</>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Similarly, if we were to specify that
<structname>cities</>.<structfield>name</> <literal>REFERENCES</> some
other table, this constraint would not automatically propagate to
<structname>capitals</>. In this case you could work around it by
manually adding the same <literal>REFERENCES</> constraint to
<structname>capitals</>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Specifying that another table's column <literal>REFERENCES
cities(name)</> would allow the other table to contain city names, but
not capital names. There is no good workaround for this case.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
These deficiencies will probably be fixed in some future release,
but in the meantime considerable care is needed in deciding whether
inheritance is useful for your problem.
</para>
<note>
<title>Deprecated</title>
<para>
In releases of <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> prior to 7.1, the
default behavior was not to include child tables in queries. This was
found to be error prone and also in violation of the SQL
standard. You can get the pre-7.1 behavior by turning off the
<xref linkend="guc-sql-inheritance"> configuration
option.
</para>
</note>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-partitioning">
<title>Partitioning</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>partitioning</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>table</primary>
<secondary>partitioning</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> supports basic table
partitioning. This section describes why and how to implement
partitioning as part of your database design.
</para>
<sect2 id="ddl-partitioning-overview">
<title>Overview</title>
<para>
Partitioning refers to splitting what is logically one large table
into smaller physical pieces.
Partitioning can provide several benefits:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
Query performance can be improved dramatically in certain situations,
particularly when most of the heavily accessed rows of the table are in a
single partition or a small number of partitions. The partitioning
substitutes for leading columns of indexes, reducing index size and
making it more likely that the heavily-used parts of the indexes
fit in memory.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
When queries or updates access a large percentage of a single
partition, performance can be improved by taking advantage
of sequential scan of that partition instead of using an
index and random access reads scattered across the whole table.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Bulk loads and deletes can be accomplished by adding or removing
partitions, if that requirement is planned into the partitioning design.
<command>ALTER TABLE</> is far faster than a bulk operation.
It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>
overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Seldom-used data can be migrated to cheaper and slower storage media.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
The benefits will normally be worthwhile only when a table would
otherwise be very large. The exact point at which a table will
benefit from partitioning depends on the application, although a
rule of thumb is that the size of the table should exceed the physical
memory of the database server.
</para>
<para>
Currently, <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> supports partitioning
via table inheritance. Each partition must be created as a child
table of a single parent table. The parent table itself is normally
empty; it exists just to represent the entire data set. You should be
familiar with inheritance (see <xref linkend="ddl-inherit">) before
attempting to set up partitioning.
</para>
<para>
The following forms of partitioning can be implemented in
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname>:
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term>Range Partitioning</term>
<listitem>
<para>
The table is partitioned into <quote>ranges</quote> defined
by a key column or set of columns, with no overlap between
the ranges of values assigned to different partitions. For
example one might partition by date ranges, or by ranges of
identifiers for particular business objects.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>List Partitioning</term>
<listitem>
<para>
The table is partitioned by explicitly listing which key values
appear in each partition.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-partitioning-implementation">
<title>Implementing Partitioning</title>
<para>
To set up a partitioned table, do the following:
<orderedlist spacing=compact>
<listitem>
<para>
Create the <quote>master</quote> table, from which all of the
partitions will inherit.
</para>
<para>
This table will contain no data. Do not define any check
constraints on this table, unless you intend them to
be applied equally to all partitions. There is no point
in defining any indexes or unique constraints on it, either.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Create several <quote>child</quote> tables that each inherit from
the master table. Normally, these tables will not add any columns
to the set inherited from the master.
</para>
<para>
We will refer to the child tables as partitions, though they
are in every way normal <productname>PostgreSQL</> tables.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Add table constraints to the partition tables to define the
allowed key values in each partition.
</para>
<para>
Typical examples would be:
<programlisting>
CHECK ( x = 1 )
CHECK ( county IN ( 'Oxfordshire', 'Buckinghamshire', 'Warwickshire' ))
CHECK ( outletID &gt;= 100 AND outletID &lt; 200 )
</programlisting>
Ensure that the constraints guarantee that there is no overlap
between the key values permitted in different partitions. A common
mistake is to set up range constraints like this:
<programlisting>
CHECK ( outletID BETWEEN 100 AND 200 )
CHECK ( outletID BETWEEN 200 AND 300 )
</programlisting>
This is wrong since it is not clear which partition the key value
200 belongs in.
</para>
<para>
Note that there is no difference in
syntax between range and list partitioning; those terms are
descriptive only.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
For each partition, create an index on the key column(s),
as well as any other indexes you might want. (The key index is
not strictly necessary, but in most scenarios it is helpful.
If you intend the key values to be unique then you should
always create a unique or primary-key constraint for each
partition.)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Optionally, define a rule or trigger to redirect modifications
of the master table to the appropriate partition.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Ensure that the <xref linkend="guc-constraint-exclusion">
configuration
parameter is enabled in <filename>postgresql.conf</>. Without
this, queries will not be optimized as desired.
</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</para>
<para>
For example, suppose we are constructing a database for a large
ice cream company. The company measures peak temperatures every
day as well as ice cream sales in each region. Conceptually,
we want a table like this:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE measurement (
city_id int not null,
logdate date not null,
peaktemp int,
unitsales int
);
</programlisting>
We know that most queries will access just the last week's, month's or
quarter's data, since the main use of this table will be to prepare
online reports for management.
To reduce the amount of old data that needs to be stored, we
decide to only keep the most recent 3 years worth of data. At the
beginning of each month we will remove the oldest month's data.
</para>
<para>
In this situation we can use partitioning to help us meet all of our
different requirements for the measurements table. Following the
steps outlined above, partitioning can be set up as follows:
</para>
<para>
<orderedlist spacing=compact>
<listitem>
<para>
The master table is the <structname>measurement</> table, declared
exactly as above.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Next we create one partition for each active month:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2004m02 ( ) INHERITS (measurement);
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2004m03 ( ) INHERITS (measurement);
...
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2005m11 ( ) INHERITS (measurement);
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2005m12 ( ) INHERITS (measurement);
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2006m01 ( ) INHERITS (measurement);
</programlisting>
Each of the partitions are complete tables in their own right,
but they inherit their definition from the
<structname>measurement</> table.
</para>
<para>
This solves one of our problems: deleting old data. Each
month, all we will need to do is perform a <command>DROP
TABLE</command> on the oldest child table and create a new
child table for the new month's data.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
We must add non-overlapping table constraints, so that our
table creation script becomes:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2004m02 (
CHECK ( logdate &gt;= DATE '2004-02-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2004-03-01' )
) INHERITS (measurement);
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2004m03 (
CHECK ( logdate &gt;= DATE '2004-03-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2004-04-01' )
) INHERITS (measurement);
...
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2005m11 (
CHECK ( logdate &gt;= DATE '2005-11-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2005-12-01' )
) INHERITS (measurement);
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2005m12 (
CHECK ( logdate &gt;= DATE '2005-12-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2006-01-01' )
) INHERITS (measurement);
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2006m01 (
CHECK ( logdate &gt;= DATE '2006-01-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2006-02-01' )
) INHERITS (measurement);
</programlisting>
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
We probably need indexes on the key columns too:
<programlisting>
CREATE INDEX measurement_y2004m02_logdate ON measurement_y2004m02 (logdate);
CREATE INDEX measurement_y2004m03_logdate ON measurement_y2004m03 (logdate);
...
CREATE INDEX measurement_y2005m11_logdate ON measurement_y2005m11 (logdate);
CREATE INDEX measurement_y2005m12_logdate ON measurement_y2005m12 (logdate);
CREATE INDEX measurement_y2006m01_logdate ON measurement_y2006m01 (logdate);
</programlisting>
We choose not to add further indexes at this time.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
If data will be added only to the latest partition, we can
set up a very simple rule to insert data. We must
redefine this each month so that it always points to the
current partition:
<programlisting>
CREATE OR REPLACE RULE measurement_current_partition AS
ON INSERT TO measurement
DO INSTEAD
INSERT INTO measurement_y2006m01 VALUES ( NEW.city_id,
NEW.logdate,
NEW.peaktemp,
NEW.unitsales );
</programlisting>
We might want to insert data and have the server automatically
locate the partition into which the row should be added. We
could do this with a more complex set of rules as shown below:
<programlisting>
CREATE RULE measurement_insert_y2004m02 AS
ON INSERT TO measurement WHERE
( logdate &gt;= DATE '2004-02-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2004-03-01' )
DO INSTEAD
INSERT INTO measurement_y2004m02 VALUES ( NEW.city_id,
NEW.logdate,
NEW.peaktemp,
NEW.unitsales );
...
CREATE RULE measurement_insert_y2005m12 AS
ON INSERT TO measurement WHERE
( logdate &gt;= DATE '2005-12-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2006-01-01' )
DO INSTEAD
INSERT INTO measurement_y2005m12 VALUES ( NEW.city_id,
NEW.logdate,
NEW.peaktemp,
NEW.unitsales );
CREATE RULE measurement_insert_y2006m01 AS
ON INSERT TO measurement WHERE
( logdate &gt;= DATE '2006-01-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2006-02-01' )
DO INSTEAD
INSERT INTO measurement_y2006m01 VALUES ( NEW.city_id,
NEW.logdate,
NEW.peaktemp,
NEW.unitsales );
</programlisting>
Note that the <literal>WHERE</literal> clause in each rule
exactly matches the <literal>CHECK</literal>
constraint for its partition.
</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</para>
<para>
As we can see, a complex partitioning scheme could require a
substantial amount of DDL. In the above example we would be
creating a new partition each month, so it might be wise to write a
script that generates the required DDL automatically.
</para>
<para>
Partitioning can also be arranged using a <literal>UNION ALL</literal>
view:
<programlisting>
CREATE VIEW measurement AS
SELECT * FROM measurement_y2004m02
UNION ALL SELECT * FROM measurement_y2004m03
...
UNION ALL SELECT * FROM measurement_y2005m11
UNION ALL SELECT * FROM measurement_y2005m12
UNION ALL SELECT * FROM measurement_y2006m01;
</programlisting>
However, the need to
recreate the view adds an extra step to adding and dropping
individual partitions of the data set.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-partitioning-managing-partitions">
<title>Managing Partitions</title>
<para>
Normally the set of partitions established when initially
defining the table are not intended to remain static. It is
common to want to remove old partitions of data and periodically
add new partitions for new data. One of the most important
advantages of partitioning is precisely that it allows this
otherwise painful task to be executed nearly instantaneously by
manipulating the partition structure, rather than physically moving large
amounts of data around.
</para>
<para>
The simplest option for removing old data is simply to drop the partition
that is no longer necessary:
<programlisting>
DROP TABLE measurement_y2003m02;
</programlisting>
This can very quickly delete millions of records because it doesn't have
to individually delete every record.
</para>
<para>
Another option that is often preferable is to remove the partition from
the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
right:
<programlisting>
ALTER TABLE measurement_y2003m02 NO INHERIT measurement;
</programlisting>
This allows further operations to be performed on the data before
it is dropped. For example, this is often a useful time to back up
the data using <command>COPY</>, <application>pg_dump</>, or
similar tools. It might also be a useful time to aggregate data
into smaller formats, perform other data manipulations, or run
reports.
</para>
<para>
Similarly we can add a new partition to handle new data. We can create an
empty partition in the partitioned table just as the original partitions
were created above:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2006m02 (
CHECK ( logdate &gt;= DATE '2006-02-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2006-03-01' )
) INHERITS (measurement);
</programlisting>
As an alternative, it is sometimes more convenient to create the
new table outside the partition structure, and make it a proper
partition later. This allows the data to be loaded, checked, and
transformed prior to it appearing in the partitioned table:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE measurement_y2006m02
(LIKE measurement INCLUDING DEFAULTS INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS);
ALTER TABLE measurement_y2006m02 ADD CONSTRAINT y2006m02
CHECK ( logdate &gt;= DATE '2006-02-01' AND logdate &lt; DATE '2006-03-01' );
\copy measurement_y2006m02 from 'measurement_y2006m02'
-- possibly some other data preparation work
ALTER TABLE measurement_y2006m02 INHERIT measurement;
</programlisting>
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-partitioning-constraint-exclusion">
<title>Partitioning and Constraint Exclusion</title>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint exclusion</primary>
</indexterm>
<para>
<firstterm>Constraint exclusion</> is a query optimization technique
that improves performance for partitioned tables defined in the
fashion described above. As an example:
<programlisting>
SET constraint_exclusion = on;
SELECT count(*) FROM measurement WHERE logdate &gt;= DATE '2006-01-01';
</programlisting>
Without constraint exclusion, the above query would scan each of
the partitions of the <structname>measurement</> table. With constraint
exclusion enabled, the planner will examine the constraints of each
partition and try to prove that the partition need not
be scanned because it could not contain any rows meeting the query's
<literal>WHERE</> clause. When the planner can prove this, it
excludes the partition from the query plan.
</para>
<para>
You can use the <command>EXPLAIN</> command to show the difference
between a plan with <varname>constraint_exclusion</> on and a plan
with it off. A typical default plan for this type of table setup is:
<programlisting>
SET constraint_exclusion = off;
EXPLAIN SELECT count(*) FROM measurement WHERE logdate &gt;= DATE '2006-01-01';
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=158.66..158.68 rows=1 width=0)
-&gt; Append (cost=0.00..151.88 rows=2715 width=0)
-&gt; Seq Scan on measurement (cost=0.00..30.38 rows=543 width=0)
Filter: (logdate &gt;= '2006-01-01'::date)
-&gt; Seq Scan on measurement_y2004m02 measurement (cost=0.00..30.38 rows=543 width=0)
Filter: (logdate &gt;= '2006-01-01'::date)
-&gt; Seq Scan on measurement_y2004m03 measurement (cost=0.00..30.38 rows=543 width=0)
Filter: (logdate &gt;= '2006-01-01'::date)
...
-&gt; Seq Scan on measurement_y2005m12 measurement (cost=0.00..30.38 rows=543 width=0)
Filter: (logdate &gt;= '2006-01-01'::date)
-&gt; Seq Scan on measurement_y2006m01 measurement (cost=0.00..30.38 rows=543 width=0)
Filter: (logdate &gt;= '2006-01-01'::date)
</programlisting>
Some or all of the partitions might use index scans instead of
full-table sequential scans, but the point here is that there
is no need to scan the older partitions at all to answer this query.
When we enable constraint exclusion, we get a significantly
reduced plan that will deliver the same answer:
<programlisting>
SET constraint_exclusion = on;
EXPLAIN SELECT count(*) FROM measurement WHERE logdate &gt;= DATE '2006-01-01';
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=63.47..63.48 rows=1 width=0)
-&gt; Append (cost=0.00..60.75 rows=1086 width=0)
-&gt; Seq Scan on measurement (cost=0.00..30.38 rows=543 width=0)
Filter: (logdate &gt;= '2006-01-01'::date)
-&gt; Seq Scan on measurement_y2006m01 measurement (cost=0.00..30.38 rows=543 width=0)
Filter: (logdate &gt;= '2006-01-01'::date)
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
Note that constraint exclusion is driven only by <literal>CHECK</>
constraints, not by the presence of indexes. Therefore it isn't
necessary to define indexes on the key columns. Whether an index
needs to be created for a given partition depends on whether you
expect that queries that scan the partition will generally scan
a large part of the partition or just a small part. An index will
be helpful in the latter case but not the former.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="ddl-partitioning-caveats">
<title>Caveats</title>
<para>
The following caveats apply to partitioned tables:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
There is currently no way to verify that all of the
<literal>CHECK</literal> constraints are mutually
exclusive. Care is required by the database designer.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
There is currently no simple way to specify that rows must not be
inserted into the master table. A <literal>CHECK (false)</literal>
constraint on the master table would be inherited by all child
tables, so that cannot be used for this purpose. One possibility is
to set up an <literal>ON INSERT</> trigger on the master table that
always raises an error. (Alternatively, such a trigger could be
used to redirect the data into the proper child table, instead of
using a set of rules as suggested above.)
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
The following caveats apply to constraint exclusion:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
Constraint exclusion only works when the query's <literal>WHERE</>
clause contains constants. A parameterized query will not be
optimized, since the planner cannot know what partitions the
parameter value might select at run time. For the same reason,
<quote>stable</> functions such as <function>CURRENT_DATE</function>
must be avoided.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
All constraints on all partitions of the master table are considered for
constraint exclusion, so large numbers of partitions are likely to
increase query planning time considerably.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Don't forget that you still need to run <command>ANALYZE</command>
on each partition individually. A command like:
<programlisting>
ANALYZE measurement;
</programlisting>
will only process the master table.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-others">
<title>Other Database Objects</title>
<para>
Tables are the central objects in a relational database structure,
because they hold your data. But they are not the only objects
that exist in a database. Many other kinds of objects can be
created to make the use and management of the data more efficient
or convenient. They are not discussed in this chapter, but we give
you a list here so that you are aware of what is possible.
</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
Views
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Functions and operators
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Data types and domains
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Triggers and rewrite rules
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
<para>
Detailed information on
these topics appears in <xref linkend="server-programming">.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="ddl-depend">
<title>Dependency Tracking</title>
<indexterm zone="ddl-depend">
<primary>CASCADE</primary>
<secondary sortas="DROP">with DROP</secondary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm zone="ddl-depend">
<primary>RESTRICT</primary>
<secondary sortas="DROP">with DROP</secondary>
</indexterm>
<para>
When you create complex database structures involving many tables
with foreign key constraints, views, triggers, functions, etc. you
will implicitly create a net of dependencies between the objects.
For instance, a table with a foreign key constraint depends on the
table it references.
</para>
<para>
To ensure the integrity of the entire database structure,
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> makes sure that you cannot
drop objects that other objects still depend on. For example,
attempting to drop the products table we had considered in <xref
linkend="ddl-constraints-fk">, with the orders table depending on
it, would result in an error message such as this:
<screen>
DROP TABLE products;
NOTICE: constraint orders_product_no_fkey on table orders depends on table products
ERROR: cannot drop table products because other objects depend on it
HINT: Use DROP ... CASCADE to drop the dependent objects too.
</screen>
The error message contains a useful hint: if you do not want to
bother deleting all the dependent objects individually, you can run
<screen>
DROP TABLE products CASCADE;
</screen>
and all the dependent objects will be removed. In this case, it
doesn't remove the orders table, it only removes the foreign key
constraint. (If you want to check what <command>DROP ... CASCADE</> will do,
run <command>DROP</> without <literal>CASCADE</> and read the <literal>NOTICE</> messages.)
</para>
<para>
All drop commands in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> support
specifying <literal>CASCADE</literal>. Of course, the nature of
the possible dependencies varies with the type of the object. You
can also write <literal>RESTRICT</literal> instead of
<literal>CASCADE</literal> to get the default behavior, which is to
prevent drops of objects that other objects depend on.
</para>
<note>
<para>
According to the SQL standard, specifying either
<literal>RESTRICT</literal> or <literal>CASCADE</literal> is
required. No database system actually enforces that rule, but
whether the default behavior is <literal>RESTRICT</literal> or
<literal>CASCADE</literal> varies across systems.
</para>
</note>
<note>
<para>
Foreign key constraint dependencies and serial column dependencies
from <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> versions prior to 7.3
are <emphasis>not</emphasis> maintained or created during the
upgrade process. All other dependency types will be properly
created during an upgrade from a pre-7.3 database.
</para>
</note>
</sect1>
</chapter>
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink