
The reason for doing so is that it will allow expression evaluation to optimize based on the underlying tupledesc. In particular it will allow to JIT tuple deforming together with the expression itself. For that expression initialization needs to be moved after the relevant slots are initialized - mostly unproblematic, except in the case of nodeWorktablescan.c. After doing so there's no need for ExecAssignResultType() and ExecAssignResultTypeFromTL() anymore, as all former callers have been converted to create a slot with a fixed descriptor. When creating a slot with a fixed descriptor, tts_values/isnull can be allocated together with the main slot, reducing allocation overhead and increasing cache density a bit. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171206093717.vqdxe5icqttpxs3p@alap3.anarazel.de
224 lines
5.5 KiB
C
224 lines
5.5 KiB
C
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
*
|
|
* nodeBitmapAnd.c
|
|
* routines to handle BitmapAnd nodes.
|
|
*
|
|
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2018, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
|
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
* IDENTIFICATION
|
|
* src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapAnd.c
|
|
*
|
|
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
*/
|
|
/* INTERFACE ROUTINES
|
|
* ExecInitBitmapAnd - initialize the BitmapAnd node
|
|
* MultiExecBitmapAnd - retrieve the result bitmap from the node
|
|
* ExecEndBitmapAnd - shut down the BitmapAnd node
|
|
* ExecReScanBitmapAnd - rescan the BitmapAnd node
|
|
*
|
|
* NOTES
|
|
* BitmapAnd nodes don't make use of their left and right
|
|
* subtrees, rather they maintain a list of subplans,
|
|
* much like Append nodes. The logic is much simpler than
|
|
* Append, however, since we needn't cope with forward/backward
|
|
* execution.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include "postgres.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "executor/execdebug.h"
|
|
#include "executor/nodeBitmapAnd.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
* ExecBitmapAnd
|
|
*
|
|
* stub for pro forma compliance
|
|
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
*/
|
|
static TupleTableSlot *
|
|
ExecBitmapAnd(PlanState *pstate)
|
|
{
|
|
elog(ERROR, "BitmapAnd node does not support ExecProcNode call convention");
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
* ExecInitBitmapAnd
|
|
*
|
|
* Begin all of the subscans of the BitmapAnd node.
|
|
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
*/
|
|
BitmapAndState *
|
|
ExecInitBitmapAnd(BitmapAnd *node, EState *estate, int eflags)
|
|
{
|
|
BitmapAndState *bitmapandstate = makeNode(BitmapAndState);
|
|
PlanState **bitmapplanstates;
|
|
int nplans;
|
|
int i;
|
|
ListCell *l;
|
|
Plan *initNode;
|
|
|
|
/* check for unsupported flags */
|
|
Assert(!(eflags & (EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD | EXEC_FLAG_MARK)));
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Set up empty vector of subplan states
|
|
*/
|
|
nplans = list_length(node->bitmapplans);
|
|
|
|
bitmapplanstates = (PlanState **) palloc0(nplans * sizeof(PlanState *));
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* create new BitmapAndState for our BitmapAnd node
|
|
*/
|
|
bitmapandstate->ps.plan = (Plan *) node;
|
|
bitmapandstate->ps.state = estate;
|
|
bitmapandstate->ps.ExecProcNode = ExecBitmapAnd;
|
|
bitmapandstate->bitmapplans = bitmapplanstates;
|
|
bitmapandstate->nplans = nplans;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* call ExecInitNode on each of the plans to be executed and save the
|
|
* results into the array "bitmapplanstates".
|
|
*/
|
|
i = 0;
|
|
foreach(l, node->bitmapplans)
|
|
{
|
|
initNode = (Plan *) lfirst(l);
|
|
bitmapplanstates[i] = ExecInitNode(initNode, estate, eflags);
|
|
i++;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Miscellaneous initialization
|
|
*
|
|
* BitmapAnd plans don't have expression contexts because they never call
|
|
* ExecQual or ExecProject. They don't need any tuple slots either.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return bitmapandstate;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
* MultiExecBitmapAnd
|
|
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
*/
|
|
Node *
|
|
MultiExecBitmapAnd(BitmapAndState *node)
|
|
{
|
|
PlanState **bitmapplans;
|
|
int nplans;
|
|
int i;
|
|
TIDBitmap *result = NULL;
|
|
|
|
/* must provide our own instrumentation support */
|
|
if (node->ps.instrument)
|
|
InstrStartNode(node->ps.instrument);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* get information from the node
|
|
*/
|
|
bitmapplans = node->bitmapplans;
|
|
nplans = node->nplans;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Scan all the subplans and AND their result bitmaps
|
|
*/
|
|
for (i = 0; i < nplans; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
PlanState *subnode = bitmapplans[i];
|
|
TIDBitmap *subresult;
|
|
|
|
subresult = (TIDBitmap *) MultiExecProcNode(subnode);
|
|
|
|
if (!subresult || !IsA(subresult, TIDBitmap))
|
|
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized result from subplan");
|
|
|
|
if (result == NULL)
|
|
result = subresult; /* first subplan */
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
tbm_intersect(result, subresult);
|
|
tbm_free(subresult);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If at any stage we have a completely empty bitmap, we can fall out
|
|
* without evaluating the remaining subplans, since ANDing them can no
|
|
* longer change the result. (Note: the fact that indxpath.c orders
|
|
* the subplans by selectivity should make this case more likely to
|
|
* occur.)
|
|
*/
|
|
if (tbm_is_empty(result))
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (result == NULL)
|
|
elog(ERROR, "BitmapAnd doesn't support zero inputs");
|
|
|
|
/* must provide our own instrumentation support */
|
|
if (node->ps.instrument)
|
|
InstrStopNode(node->ps.instrument, 0 /* XXX */ );
|
|
|
|
return (Node *) result;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
* ExecEndBitmapAnd
|
|
*
|
|
* Shuts down the subscans of the BitmapAnd node.
|
|
*
|
|
* Returns nothing of interest.
|
|
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
*/
|
|
void
|
|
ExecEndBitmapAnd(BitmapAndState *node)
|
|
{
|
|
PlanState **bitmapplans;
|
|
int nplans;
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* get information from the node
|
|
*/
|
|
bitmapplans = node->bitmapplans;
|
|
nplans = node->nplans;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* shut down each of the subscans (that we've initialized)
|
|
*/
|
|
for (i = 0; i < nplans; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
if (bitmapplans[i])
|
|
ExecEndNode(bitmapplans[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
ExecReScanBitmapAnd(BitmapAndState *node)
|
|
{
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < node->nplans; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
PlanState *subnode = node->bitmapplans[i];
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* ExecReScan doesn't know about my subplans, so I have to do
|
|
* changed-parameter signaling myself.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (node->ps.chgParam != NULL)
|
|
UpdateChangedParamSet(subnode, node->ps.chgParam);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If chgParam of subnode is not null then plan will be re-scanned by
|
|
* first ExecProcNode.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (subnode->chgParam == NULL)
|
|
ExecReScan(subnode);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|