46171 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Lane
312017fcc4 Fix C++ incompatibilities in plpgsql's header files.
Rename some exposed parameters so that they don't conflict with
C++ reserved words.

Back-patch to all supported versions.

George Tarasov

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b517ec3918d645eb950505eac8dd434e@gaz-is.ru
2019-05-31 12:34:54 -04:00
Tomas Vondra
9c9a74cd32 Make error logging in extended statistics more consistent
Most errors reported in extended statistics are internal issues, and so
should use elog(). The MCV list code was already following this rule, but
the functional dependencies and ndistinct coefficients were using a mix
of elog() and ereport(). Fix this by changing most places to elog(), with
the exception of input functions.

This is a mostly cosmetic change, it makes the life a little bit easier
for translators, as elog() messages are not translated. So backpatch to
PostgreSQL 10, where extended statistics were introduced.

Author: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 10 where extended statistics were added
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190503154404.GA7478@alvherre.pgsql
2019-05-30 17:06:21 +02:00
Noah Misch
88a0e3daf8 In the pg_upgrade test suite, don't write to src/test/regress.
When this suite runs installcheck, redirect file creations from
src/test/regress to src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/regress.  This closes a
race condition in "make -j check-world".  If the pg_upgrade suite wrote
to a given src/test/regress/results file in parallel with the regular
src/test/regress invocation writing it, a test failed spuriously.  Even
without parallelism, in "make -k check-world", the suite finishing
second overwrote the other's regression.diffs.  This revealed test
"largeobject" assuming @abs_builddir@ is getcwd(), so fix that, too.

Buildfarm client REL_10, released fifty-four days ago, supports saving
regression.diffs from its new location.  When an older client reports a
pg_upgradeCheck failure, it will no longer include regression.diffs.
Back-patch to 9.5, where pg_upgrade moved to src/bin.

Reviewed (in earlier versions) by Andrew Dunstan.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181224034411.GA3224776@rfd.leadboat.com
2019-05-28 12:59:36 -07:00
Noah Misch
20103a2609 In the pg_upgrade test suite, remove and recreate "tmp_check".
This allows "vcregress upgradecheck" to pass twice in immediate
succession, and it's more like how $(prove_check) works.  Back-patch to
9.5, where pg_upgrade moved to src/bin.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190520012436.GA1480421@rfd.leadboat.com
2019-05-28 12:58:34 -07:00
Tom Lane
329575db94 Doc: fix typo in pgbench random_zipfian() documentation.
Per bug #15819 from Koizumi Satoru.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15819-e6191bef1f7334c0@postgresql.org
2019-05-24 11:16:06 -04:00
Andres Freund
5d91a9e8ac pg_upgrade: Make test.sh's installcheck use to-be-upgraded version's bindir.
On master (after 700538) the old version's installed psql was used -
even when the old version might not actually be installed / might be
installed into a temporary directory. As commonly the case when just
executing make check for pg_upgrade, as $oldbindir is just the current
version's $bindir.

In the back branches, with --install specified, psql from the new
version's temporary installation was used, without --install (e.g for
NO_TEMP_INSTALL, cf 47b3c26642), the new version's installed psql was
used (which might or might not exist).

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190522175150.c26f4jkqytahajdg@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-05-23 14:46:57 -07:00
Andrew Gierth
f7da492dca Fix array size allocation for HashAggregate hash keys.
When there were duplicate columns in the hash key list, the array
sizes could be miscomputed, resulting in access off the end of the
array. Adjust the computation to ensure the array is always large
enough.

(I considered whether the duplicates could be removed in planning, but
I can't rule out the possibility that duplicate columns might have
different hash functions assigned. Simpler to just make sure it works
at execution time regardless.)

Bug apparently introduced in fc4b3dea2 as part of narrowing down the
tuples stored in the hashtable. Reported by Colm McHugh of Salesforce,
though I didn't use their patch. Backpatch back to version 10 where
the bug was introduced.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFeeJoKKu0u+A_A9R9316djW-YW3-+Gtgvy3ju655qRHR3jtdA@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-23 15:38:33 +01:00
Michael Paquier
a7b2fca15b Fix ordering of GRANT commands in pg_dumpall for tablespaces
This uses a method similar to 68a7c24f and now b8c6014 (applied for
database creation), which guarantees that GRANT commands using the WITH
GRANT OPTION are dumped in a way so as cascading dependencies are
respected.  Note that tablespaces do not have support for initial
privileges via pg_init_privs, so the same method needs to be applied
again.  It would be nice to merge all the logic generating ACL queries
in dumps under the same banner, but this requires extending the support
of pg_init_privs to objects that cannot use it yet, so this is left as
future work.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190522071555.GB1278@paquier.xyz
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Backpatch-through: 9.6
2019-05-23 10:48:24 +09:00
Michael Paquier
8357a413f4 Fix ordering of GRANT commands in pg_dump for database creation
This uses a method similar to 68a7c24f, which guarantees that GRANT
commands using the WITH GRANT OPTION are dumped in a way so as cascading
dependencies are respected.  As databases do not have support for
initial privileges via pg_init_privs, we need to repeat again the same
ACL reordering method.

ACL for databases have been moved from pg_dumpall to pg_dump in v11, so
this impacts pg_dump for v11 and above, and pg_dumpall for v9.6 and
v10.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15788-4e18847520ebcc75@postgresql.org
Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Haribabu Kommi
Backpatch-through: 9.6
2019-05-22 14:48:14 +09:00
Andres Freund
9fea0b0e28 Minimally fix partial aggregation for aggregates that don't have one argument.
For partial aggregation combine steps,
AggStatePerTrans->numTransInputs was set to the transition function's
number of inputs, rather than the combine function's number of
inputs (always 1).

That lead to partial aggregates with strict combine functions to
wrongly check for NOT NULL input as required by strictness. When the
aggregate wasn't exactly passed one argument, the strictness check was
either omitted (in the 0 args case) or too many arguments were
checked. In the latter case we'd read beyond the end of
FunctionCallInfoData->args (only in master).

AggStatePerTrans->numTransInputs actually has been wrong since since
9.6, where partial aggregates were added. But it turns out to not be
an active problem in 9.6 and 10, because numTransInputs wasn't used at
all for combine functions: Before c253b722f6 there simply was no NULL
check for the input to strict trans functions, and after that the
check was simply hardcoded for the right offset in fcinfo, as it's
done by code specific to combine functions.

In bf6c614a2f2 (11) the strictness check was generalized, with common
code doing the strictness checks for both plain and combine transition
functions, based on numTransInputs. For combine functions this lead to
not emitting an expression step to check for strict input in the 0
arguments case, and in the > 1 arguments case, we'd check too many
arguments.Due to the fact that the relevant fcinfo->isnull[2..] was
always zero-initialized (more or less by accident, by being part of
the AggStatePerTrans struct, which is palloc0'ed), there was no
observable damage in the latter case before a9c35cf85ca1f, we just
checked too many array elements.

Due to the changes in a9c35cf85ca1f, > 1 argument bug became visible,
because these days fcinfo is a) dynamically allocated without being
zeroed b) exactly the length required for the number of specified
arguments (hardcoded to 2 in this case).

This commit only contains a fairly minimal fix, setting numTransInputs
to a hardcoded 1 when building a pertrans for a combine function. It
seems likely that we'll want to clean this up further (e.g. the
arguments build_pertrans_for_aggref() aren't particularly meaningful
for combine functions). But the wrap date for 12 beta1 is coming up
fast, so it seems good to have a minimal fix in place.

Backpatch to 11. While AggStatePerTrans->numTransInputs was set
wrongly before that, the value was not used for combine functions.

Reported-By: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Diagnosed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Jeevan Chalke, Andres Freund, David Rowley
Author: David Rowley, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6=uZEyWyLw0N7HtR9OBc-sWEFeByEZC7t-KDf15FKxVew@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-19 18:16:41 -07:00
Michael Paquier
0950d25ace Fix some grammar in documentation of spgist and pgbench
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/92961161-9b49-e42f-0a72-d5d47e0ed4de@postgrespro.ru
Author: Liudmila Mantrova
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Katz, Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-05-20 09:48:27 +09:00
Noah Misch
9518978e22 Revert "In the pg_upgrade test suite, don't write to src/test/regress."
This reverts commit bd1592e8570282b1650af6b8eede0016496daecd.  It had
multiple defects.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12717.1558304356@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-05-19 15:24:46 -07:00
Noah Misch
d08d880ab4 In the pg_upgrade test suite, don't write to src/test/regress.
When this suite runs installcheck, redirect file creations from
src/test/regress to src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/regress.  This closes a
race condition in "make -j check-world".  If the pg_upgrade suite wrote
to a given src/test/regress/results file in parallel with the regular
src/test/regress invocation writing it, a test failed spuriously.  Even
without parallelism, in "make -k check-world", the suite finishing
second overwrote the other's regression.diffs.  This revealed test
"largeobject" assuming @abs_builddir@ is getcwd(), so fix that, too.

Buildfarm client REL_10, released forty-five days ago, supports saving
regression.diffs from its new location.  When an older client reports a
pg_upgradeCheck failure, it will no longer include regression.diffs.
Back-patch to 9.5, where pg_upgrade moved to src/bin.

Reviewed by Andrew Dunstan.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181224034411.GA3224776@rfd.leadboat.com
2019-05-19 14:37:12 -07:00
Tom Lane
592d5d75be Restructure creation of run-time pruning steps.
Previously, gen_partprune_steps() always built executor pruning steps
using all suitable clauses, including those containing PARAM_EXEC
Params.  This meant that the pruning steps were only completely safe
for executor run-time (scan start) pruning.  To prune at executor
startup, we had to ignore the steps involving exec Params.  But this
doesn't really work in general, since there may be logic changes
needed as well --- for example, pruning according to the last operator's
btree strategy is the wrong thing if we're not applying that operator.
The rules embodied in gen_partprune_steps() and its minions are
sufficiently complicated that tracking their incremental effects in
other logic seems quite impractical.

Short of a complete redesign, the only safe fix seems to be to run
gen_partprune_steps() twice, once to create executor startup pruning
steps and then again for run-time pruning steps.  We can save a few
cycles however by noting during the first scan whether we rejected
any clauses because they involved exec Params --- if not, we don't
need to do the second scan.

In support of this, refactor the internal APIs in partprune.c to make
more use of passing information in the GeneratePruningStepsContext
struct, rather than as separate arguments.

This is, I hope, the last piece of our response to a bug report from
Alan Jackson.  Back-patch to v11 where this code came in.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/FAD28A83-AC73-489E-A058-2681FA31D648@tvsquared.com
2019-05-17 19:44:19 -04:00
Tom Lane
51948c4e1f Fix bogus logic for combining range-partitioned columns during pruning.
gen_prune_steps_from_opexps's notion of how to do this was overly
complicated and underly correct.

Per discussion of a report from Alan Jackson (though this fixes only one
aspect of that problem).  Back-patch to v11 where this code came in.

Amit Langote

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/FAD28A83-AC73-489E-A058-2681FA31D648@tvsquared.com
2019-05-16 16:25:43 -04:00
Tom Lane
10c5cc4b4f Fix partition pruning to treat stable comparison operators properly.
Cross-type comparison operators in a btree or hash opclass might be
only stable not immutable (this is true of timestamp vs. timestamptz
for example).  partprune.c ignored this possibility and would perform
plan-time pruning with them anyway, possibly leading to wrong answers
if the environment changed between planning and execution.

To fix, teach gen_partprune_steps() to do things differently when
creating plan-time pruning steps vs. run-time pruning steps.
analyze_partkey_exprs() also needs an extra check, which is rather
annoying but now is not the time to restructure things enough to
avoid that.

While at it, simplify the logic for the plan-time case a little
by insisting that the comparison value be a Const and nothing else.
This relies on the assumption that eval_const_expressions will have
reduced any immutable expression to a Const; which is not quite
100% true, but certainly any case that comes up often enough to be
interesting should have simplification logic there.

Also improve a bunch of inadequate/obsolete/wrong comments.

Per discussion of a report from Alan Jackson (though this fixes only one
aspect of that problem).  Back-patch to v11 where this code came in.

David Rowley, with some further hacking by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/FAD28A83-AC73-489E-A058-2681FA31D648@tvsquared.com
2019-05-16 11:58:22 -04:00
Andres Freund
05cf419731 Add isolation test for INSERT ON CONFLICT speculative insertion failure.
This path previously was not reliably covered. There was some
heuristic coverage via insert-conflict-toast.spec, but that test is
not deterministic, and only tested for a somewhat specific bug.

Backpatch, as this is a complicated and otherwise untested code
path. Unfortunately 9.5 cannot handle two waiting sessions, and thus
cannot execute this test.

Triggered by a conversion with Melanie Plageman.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_a7hbyrk=wveHYhr4LbcRnRCG=yPUVoQYB9YO1CdUBE9Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.5-
2019-05-14 11:53:54 -07:00
Heikki Linnakangas
3293330f79 Fix comment on when HOT update is possible.
The conditions listed in this comment have changed several times, and at
some point the thing that the "if so" referred to was negated.

The text was OK up to 9.6. It was differently wrong in v10, v11 and
master, so fix in all those versions.
2019-05-14 13:06:33 +03:00
Peter Geoghegan
6bbc2f9b66 Doc: Refer to line pointers as item identifiers.
An upcoming HEAD-only patch will standardize the terminology around
ItemIdData variables/line pointers, ending the practice of referring to
them as "item pointers".  Make the "Database Page Layout" docs
consistent with the new policy.  The term "item identifier" is already
used in the same section, so stick with that.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=c=MZQjUzde3o9+2PLAPuHTpVZPPdYxN=E4ndQ2--8ew@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: All supported branches.
2019-05-13 15:39:05 -07:00
Tom Lane
b6abc2241a Fix logical replication's ideas about which type OIDs are built-in.
Only hand-assigned type OIDs should be presumed to match across different
PG servers; those assigned during genbki.pl or during initdb are likely
to change due to addition or removal of unrelated objects.

This means that the cutoff should be FirstGenbkiObjectId (in HEAD)
or FirstBootstrapObjectId (before that), not FirstNormalObjectId.
Compare postgres_fdw's is_builtin() test.

It's likely that this error has no observable consequence in a
normally-functioning system, since ATM the only affected type OIDs are
system catalog rowtypes and information_schema types, which would not
typically be interesting for logical replication.  But you could
probably break it if you tried hard, so back-patch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15150.1557257111@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-05-13 17:23:00 -04:00
Peter Geoghegan
bf78f50bae Don't leave behind junk nbtree pages during split.
Commit 8fa30f906be reduced the elevel of a number of "can't happen"
_bt_split() errors from PANIC to ERROR.  At the same time, the new right
page buffer for the split could continue to be acquired well before the
critical section.  This was possible because it was relatively
straightforward to make sure that _bt_split() could not throw an error,
with a few specific exceptions.  The exceptional cases were safe because
they involved specific, well understood errors, making it possible to
consistently zero the right page before actually raising an error using
elog().  There was no danger of leaving around a junk page, provided
_bt_split() stuck to this coding rule.

Commit 8224de4f, which introduced INCLUDE indexes, added code to make
_bt_split() truncate away non-key attributes.  This happened at a point
that broke the rule around zeroing the right page in _bt_split().  If
truncation failed (perhaps due to palloc() failure), that would result
in an errant right page buffer with junk contents.  This could confuse
VACUUM when it attempted to delete the page, and should be avoided on
general principle.

To fix, reorganize _bt_split() so that truncation occurs before the new
right page buffer is even acquired.  A junk page/buffer will not be left
behind if _bt_nonkey_truncate()/_bt_truncate() raise an error.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkcWT_-NH7EeL=Az4efg0KCV+wArygW8zKB=+HoP=VWMw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11-, where INCLUDE indexes were introduced.
2019-05-13 10:27:57 -07:00
Tom Lane
6b0e9411ff Fix misuse of an integer as a bool.
pgtls_read_pending is declared to return bool, but what the underlying
SSL_pending function returns is a count of available bytes.

This is actually somewhat harmless if we're using C99 bools, but in
the back branches it's a live bug: if the available-bytes count happened
to be a multiple of 256, it would get converted to a zero char value.
On machines where char is signed, counts of 128 and up could misbehave
as well.  The net effect is that when using SSL, libpq might block
waiting for data even though some has already been received.

Broken by careless refactoring in commit 4e86f1b16, so back-patch
to 9.5 where that came in.

Per bug #15802 from David Binderman.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15802-f0911a97f0346526@postgresql.org
2019-05-13 10:53:19 -04:00
Etsuro Fujita
6ba0ff47cd postgres_fdw: Fix typo in comment. 2019-05-13 17:30:37 +09:00
Tom Lane
72ce7acaf3 Fix misoptimization of "{1,1}" quantifiers in regular expressions.
A bounded quantifier with m = n = 1 might be thought a no-op.  But
according to our documentation (which traces back to Henry Spencer's
original man page) it still imposes greediness, or non-greediness in the
case of the non-greedy variant "{1,1}?", on whatever it's attached to.

This turns out not to work though, because parseqatom() optimizes away
the m = n = 1 case without regard for whether it's supposed to change
the greediness of the argument RE.

We can fix this by just not applying the optimization when the greediness
needs to change; the subsequent general cases handle it fine.

The three cases in which we can still apply the optimization are
(a) no quantifier, or quantifier does not impose a preference;
(b) atom has no greediness property, implying it cannot match a
variable amount of text anyway; or
(c) quantifier's greediness is same as atom's.
Note that in most cases where one of these applies, we'd have exited
earlier in the "not a messy case" fast path.  I think it's now only
possible to get to the optimization when the atom involves capturing
parentheses or a non-top-level backref.

Back-patch to all supported branches.  I'd ordinarily be hesitant to
put a subtle behavioral change into back branches, but in this case
it's very hard to see a reason why somebody would write "{1,1}?" unless
they're trying to get the documented change-of-greediness behavior.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5bb27a41-350d-37bf-901e-9d26f5592dd0@charter.net
2019-05-12 18:53:40 -04:00
Noah Misch
4ec14e5aa1 Fail pgwin32_message_to_UTF16() for SQL_ASCII messages.
The function had been interpreting SQL_ASCII messages as UTF8, throwing
an error when they were invalid UTF8.  The new behavior is consistent
with pg_do_encoding_conversion().  This affects LOG_DESTINATION_STDERR
and LOG_DESTINATION_EVENTLOG, which will send untranslated bytes to
write() and ReportEventA().  On buildfarm member bowerbird, enabling
log_connections caused an error whenever the role name was not valid
UTF8.  Back-patch to 9.4 (all supported versions).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190512015615.GD1124997@rfd.leadboat.com
2019-05-12 10:33:08 -07:00
Tom Lane
eb97242c2f Rearrange pgstat_bestart() to avoid failures within its critical section.
We long ago decided to design the shared PgBackendStatus data structure to
minimize the cost of writing status updates, which means that writers just
have to increment the st_changecount field twice.  That isn't hooked into
any sort of resource management mechanism, which means that if something
were to throw error between the two increments, the st_changecount field
would be left odd indefinitely.  That would cause readers to lock up.
Now, since it's also a bad idea to leave the field odd for longer than
absolutely necessary (because readers will spin while we have it set),
the expectation was that we'd treat these segments like spinlock critical
sections, with only short, more or less straight-line, code in them.

That was fine as originally designed, but commit 9029f4b37 broke it
by inserting a significant amount of non-straight-line code into
pgstat_bestart(), code that is very capable of throwing errors, not to
mention taking a significant amount of time during which readers will spin.
We have a report from Neeraj Kumar of readers actually locking up, which
I suspect was due to an encoding conversion error in X509_NAME_to_cstring,
though conceivably it was just a garden-variety OOM failure.

Subsequent commits have loaded even more dubious code into pgstat_bestart's
critical section (and commit fc70a4b0d deserves some kind of booby prize
for managing to miss the critical section entirely, although the negative
consequences seem minimal given that the PgBackendStatus entry should be
seen by readers as inactive at that point).

The right way to fix this mess seems to be to compute all these values
into a local copy of the process' PgBackendStatus struct, and then just
copy the data back within the critical section proper.  This plan can't
be implemented completely cleanly because of the struct's heavy reliance
on out-of-line strings, which we must initialize separately within the
critical section.  But still, the critical section is far smaller and
safer than it was before.

In hopes of forestalling future errors of the same ilk, rename the
macros for st_changecount management to make it more apparent that
the writer-side macros create a critical section.  And to prevent
the worst consequences if we nonetheless manage to mess it up anyway,
adjust those macros so that they really are a critical section, ie
they now bump CritSectionCount.  That doesn't add much overhead, and
it guarantees that if we do somehow throw an error while the counter
is odd, it will lead to PANIC and a database restart to reset shared
memory.

Back-patch to 9.5 where the problem was introduced.

In HEAD, also fix an oversight in commit b0b39f72b: it failed to teach
pgstat_read_current_status to copy st_gssstatus data from shared memory to
local memory.  Hence, subsequent use of that data within the transaction
would potentially see changing data that it shouldn't see.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPR3Wj5Z17=+eeyrn_ZDG3NQGYgMEOY6JV6Y-WRRhGgwc16U3Q@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-11 21:27:13 -04:00
Noah Misch
239dcf8f15 Honor TEMP_CONFIG in TAP suites.
The buildfarm client uses TEMP_CONFIG to implement its extra_config
setting.  Except for stats_temp_directory, extra_config now applies to
TAP suites; extra_config values seen in the past month are compatible
with this.  Back-patch to 9.6, where PostgresNode was introduced, so the
buildfarm can rely on it sooner.

Reviewed by Andrew Dunstan and Tom Lane.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181229021950.GA3302966@rfd.leadboat.com
2019-05-11 00:22:58 -07:00
Michael Paquier
e16ab408f3 Fix error reporting in reindexdb
When failing to reindex a table or an index, reindexdb would generate an
extra error message related to a database failure, which is misleading.

Backpatch all the way down, as this has been introduced by 85e9a5a0.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_Yo61RwNO3cW6WVYWwH7EYMPuexhKqufb2nFGOdunbcHw@mail.gmail.com
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Álvaro Herrera, Tom Lane, Michael
Paquier
Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-05-11 13:01:07 +09:00
Tom Lane
803f90ab79 Cope with EINVAL and EIDRM shmat() failures in PGSharedMemoryAttach.
There's a very old race condition in our code to see whether a pre-existing
shared memory segment is still in use by a conflicting postmaster: it's
possible for the other postmaster to remove the segment in between our
shmctl() and shmat() calls.  It's a narrow window, and there's no risk
unless both postmasters are using the same port number, but that's possible
during parallelized "make check" tests.  (Note that while the TAP tests
take some pains to choose a randomized port number, pg_regress doesn't.)
If it does happen, we treated that as an unexpected case and errored out.

To fix, allow EINVAL to be treated as segment-not-present, and the same
for EIDRM on Linux.  AFAICS, the considerations here are basically
identical to the checks for acceptable shmctl() failures, so I documented
and coded it that way.

While at it, adjust PGSharedMemoryAttach's API to remove its undocumented
dependency on UsedShmemSegAddr in favor of passing the attach address
explicitly.  This makes it easier to be sure we're using a null shmaddr
when probing for segment conflicts (thus avoiding questions about what
EINVAL means).  I don't think there was a bug there, but it required
fragile assumptions about the state of UsedShmemSegAddr during
PGSharedMemoryIsInUse.

Commit c09850992 may have made this failure more probable by applying
the conflicting-segment tests more often.  Hence, back-patch to all
supported branches, as that was.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22224.1557340366@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-05-10 14:56:41 -04:00
Tom Lane
e7eed0baa0 Repair issues with faulty generation of merge-append plans.
create_merge_append_plan failed to honor the CP_EXACT_TLIST flag:
it would generate the expected targetlist but then it felt free to
add resjunk sort targets to it.  This demonstrably leads to assertion
failures in v11 and HEAD, and it's probably just accidental that we
don't see the same in older branches.  I've not looked into whether
there would be any real-world consequences in non-assert builds.
In HEAD, create_append_plan has sprouted the same problem, so fix
that too (although we do not have any test cases that seem able to
reach that bug).  This is an oversight in commit 3fc6e2d7f which
invented the CP_EXACT_TLIST flag, so back-patch to 9.6 where that
came in.

convert_subquery_pathkeys would create pathkeys for subquery output
values if they match any EquivalenceClass known in the outer query
and are available in the subquery's syntactic targetlist.  However,
the second part of that condition is wrong, because such values might
not appear in the subquery relation's reltarget list, which would
mean that they couldn't be accessed above the level of the subquery
scan.  We must check that they appear in the reltarget list, instead.
This can lead to dropping knowledge about the subquery's sort
ordering, but I believe it's okay, because any sort key that the
outer query actually has any interest in would appear in the
reltarget list.

This second issue is of very long standing, but right now there's no
evidence that it causes observable problems before 9.6, so I refrained
from back-patching further than that.  We can revisit that choice if
somebody finds a way to make it cause problems in older branches.
(Developing useful test cases for these issues is really problematic;
fixing convert_subquery_pathkeys removes the only known way to exhibit
the create_merge_append_plan bug, and neither of the test cases added
by this patch causes a problem in all branches, even when considering
the issues separately.)

The second issue explains bug #15795 from Suresh Kumar R ("could not
find pathkey item to sort" with nested DISTINCT queries).  I stumbled
across the first issue while investigating that.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15795-fadb56c8e44ee73c@postgresql.org
2019-05-09 16:52:49 -04:00
Michael Paquier
25f12acd53 Fix error status of vacuumdb when multiple jobs are used
When running a batch of VACUUM or ANALYZE commands on a given database,
there were cases where it is possible to have vacuumdb not report an
error where it actually should, leading to incorrect status results.

Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_ZuTwz7CtqLYJ1Ouuh272bTQPLN8b1bAPk0bCBm4PDMTQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.5
2019-05-09 10:29:29 +09:00
Fujii Masao
a9d5383db2 Fix documentation for the privileges required for replication functions.
Previously it's documented that use of replication functions is
restricted to superusers. This is true for the functions which
use replication origin, but not for pg_logicl_emit_message() and
functions which use replication slot. For example, not only
superusers but also users with REPLICATION privilege is allowed
to use the functions for replication slot. This commit fixes
the documentation for the privileges required for those replication
functions.

Back-patch to 9.4 (all supported versions).

Author: Matsumura Ryo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/03040DFF97E6E54E88D3BFEE5F5480F74ABA6E16@G01JPEXMBYT04
2019-05-09 01:40:01 +09:00
Thomas Munro
1f3bcb4972 Probe only 127.0.0.1 when looking for ports on Unix.
Commit c0985099, later adjusted by commit 4ab02e81, probed 0.0.0.0
in addition to 127.0.0.1, for the benefit of Windows build farm
animals.  It isn't really useful on Unix systems, and turned out to
be a bit inconvenient to users of some corporate firewall software.
Switch back to probing just 127.0.0.1 on non-Windows systems.

Back-patch to 9.6, like the earlier changes.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2B21EPwfgs4m%2BtqyRtbVqkOUvP8QQ8sWk9%2Bh55Aub1H3A%40mail.gmail.com
2019-05-08 22:03:44 +12:00
Heikki Linnakangas
2bc59f8901 Remove leftover reference to old "flat file" mechanism in a comment.
The flat file mechanism was removed in PostgreSQL 9.0.
2019-05-08 09:33:17 +03:00
Michael Paquier
64ad372346 Remove some code related to 7.3 and older servers from tools of src/bin/
This code was broken as of 582edc3, and is most likely not used anymore.
Note that pg_dump supports servers down to 8.0, and psql has code to
support servers down to 7.4.

Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_Y5y=zo3+2gf+2NJC1pvMYPcbRXoQaPXx=U7+C8Qh4CzQ@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-07 14:19:56 +09:00
Tom Lane
0616aed243 Stamp 11.3. REL_11_3 2019-05-06 16:46:18 -04:00
Tom Lane
02814c381b Last-minute updates for release notes.
Security: CVE-2019-10129, CVE-2019-10130
2019-05-06 12:46:25 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera
92880ff8a6 Revert "Make pg_dump emit ATTACH PARTITION instead of PARTITION OF"
... and fallout (from branches 10, 11 and master).  The change was
ill-considered, and it broke a few normal use cases; since we don't have
time to fix it, we'll try again after this week's minor releases.

Reported-by: Rushabh Lathia
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf0iQV=PPOv2Btog9J9AwOQp6HmuVd6SbGTR_v3Zp2XT1w@mail.gmail.com
2019-05-06 12:23:49 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut
dcbdd1a8d5 Translation updates
Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: 96d81aab04631d76c9ca90a3b12885100c061775
2019-05-06 15:00:30 +02:00
Michael Paquier
52635c276f Fix tuple printing in error message of tuple routing for partitions
With correctly crafted DDLs, this could lead to disclosure of arbitrary
backend memory a user may have no right to access.  This impacts only
REL_11_STABLE, as the issue has been introduced by 34295b8.

On HEAD, add regression tests to cover this issue in the future.

Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Security: CVE-2019-10129
2019-05-06 21:44:39 +09:00
Dean Rasheed
98dad4cd48 Use checkAsUser for selectivity estimator checks, if it's set.
In examine_variable() and examine_simple_variable(), when checking the
user's table and column privileges to determine whether to grant
access to the pg_statistic data, use checkAsUser for the privilege
checks, if it's set. This will be the case if we're accessing the
table via a view, to indicate that we should perform privilege checks
as the view owner rather than the current user.

This change makes this planner check consistent with the check in the
executor, so the planner will be able to make use of statistics if the
table is accessible via the view. This fixes a performance regression
introduced by commit e2d4ef8de8, which affects queries against
non-security barrier views in the case where the user doesn't have
privileges on the underlying table, but the view owner does.

Note that it continues to provide the same safeguards controlling
access to pg_statistic for direct table access (in which case
checkAsUser won't be set) and for security barrier views, because of
the nearby checks on rte->security_barrier and rte->securityQuals.

Back-patch to all supported branches because e2d4ef8de8 was.

Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jonathan Katz and Stephen Frost.
2019-05-06 11:56:37 +01:00
Dean Rasheed
0027ee3c52 Fix security checks for selectivity estimation functions with RLS.
In commit e2d4ef8de8, security checks were added to prevent
user-supplied operators from running over data from pg_statistic
unless the user has table or column privileges on the table, or the
operator is leakproof. For a table with RLS, however, checking for
table or column privileges is insufficient, since that does not
guarantee that the user has permission to view all of the column's
data.

Fix this by also checking for securityQuals on the RTE, and insisting
that the operator be leakproof if there are any. Thus the
leakproofness check will only be skipped if there are no securityQuals
and the user has table or column privileges on the table -- i.e., only
if we know that the user has access to all the data in the column.

Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was added.

Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jonathan Katz and Stephen Frost.

Security: CVE-2019-10130
2019-05-06 11:41:22 +01:00
Andres Freund
60c2951e1b Remove reindex_catalog test from test schedules.
As the test currently causes occasional deadlocks (due to the schema
cleanup from previous sessions potentially still running), and the
patch from f912d7dec2 has gotten a fair bit of buildfarm coverage,
remove the test from the test schedules. There's a set of minor
releases coming up.

Leave the tests in place, so it can manually be run using EXTRA_TESTS.

For now also leave it in master, as there's no imminent release, and
there's plenty (re-)index related work in 12. But we'll have to
disable it before long there too, unless somebody comes up with simple
enough fixes for the deadlock (I'm about to post a vague idea to the
list).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4622.1556982247@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 9.4-11 (no master!)
2019-05-05 23:31:58 -07:00
Tom Lane
69fc9430b8 Release notes for 11.3, 10.8, 9.6.13, 9.5.17, 9.4.22. 2019-05-05 14:57:16 -04:00
Tom Lane
000f557c31 Fix style violations in syscache lookups.
Project style is to check the success of SearchSysCacheN and friends
by applying HeapTupleIsValid to the result.  A tiny minority of calls
creatively did it differently.  Bring them into line with the rest.

This is just cosmetic, since HeapTupleIsValid is indeed just a null
check at the moment ... but that may not be true forever, and in any
case it puts a mental burden on readers who may wonder why these
call sites are not like the rest.

Back-patch to v11 just to keep the branches in sync.  (The bulk of these
errors seem to have originated in v11 or v12, though a few are old.)

Per searching to see if anyplace else had made the same error
repaired in 62148c352.
2019-05-05 13:10:07 -04:00
Tom Lane
030ad0acfa Add check for syscache lookup failure in update_relispartition().
Omitted in commit 05b38c7e6 (though it looks like the original blame
belongs to 9e9befac4).  A failure is admittedly unlikely, but if it
did happen, SIGSEGV is not the approved method of reporting it.

Per Coverity.  Back-patch to v11 where the broken code originated.
2019-05-05 12:44:32 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut
506af101f3 pg_verify_checksums: Fix message punctuation 2019-05-04 19:39:48 +02:00
Peter Eisentraut
bf0720233e pg_dump: Fix newline in error message
The newline was incorrectly dropped in
a98c48debcd0620ab07608d53ee08fdb0e7a1edb.
2019-05-04 16:54:30 +02:00
Tom Lane
8b3bce2017 First-draft release notes for 11.3.
As usual, the release notes for other branches will be made by cutting
these down, but put them up for community review first.
2019-05-03 18:27:39 -04:00
Tom Lane
727c155cfb Fix reindexing of pg_class indexes some more.
Commits 3dbb317d3 et al failed under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS testing.
Investigation showed that to reindex pg_class_oid_index, we must
suppress accesses to the index (via SetReindexProcessing) before we call
RelationSetNewRelfilenode, or at least before we do CommandCounterIncrement
therein; otherwise, relcache reloads happening within the CCI may try to
fetch pg_class rows using the index's new relfilenode value, which is as
yet an empty file.

Of course, the point of 3dbb317d3 was that that ordering didn't work
either, because then RelationSetNewRelfilenode's own update of the index's
pg_class row cannot access the index, should it need to.

There are various ways we might have got around that, but Andres Freund
came up with a brilliant solution: for a mapped index, we can really just
skip the pg_class update altogether.  The only fields it was actually
changing were relpages etc, but it was just setting them to zeroes which
is useless make-work.  (Correct new values will be installed at the end
of index build.)  All pg_class indexes are mapped and probably always will
be, so this eliminates the problem by removing work rather than adding it,
always a pleasant outcome.  Having taught RelationSetNewRelfilenode to do
it that way, we can revert the code reordering in reindex_index.  (But
I left the moved setup code where it was; there seems no reason why it
has to run without use of the old index.  If you're trying to fix a
busted pg_class index, you'll have had to disable system index use
altogether to get this far.)

Moreover, this means we don't need RelationSetIndexList at all, because
reindex_relation's hacking to make "REINDEX TABLE pg_class" work is
likewise now unnecessary.  We'll leave that code in place in the back
branches, but a follow-on patch will remove it in HEAD.

In passing, do some minor cleanup for commit 5c1560606 (in HEAD only),
notably removing a duplicate newrnode assignment.

Patch by me, using a core idea due to Andres Freund.  Back-patch to all
supported branches, as 3dbb317d3 was.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28926.1556664156@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-05-02 19:11:28 -04:00