Formerly, if such a clause contained no aggregate functions we mistakenly
treated it as equivalent to WHERE. Per spec it must cause the query to
be treated as a grouped query of a single group, the same as appearance
of aggregate functions would do. Also, the HAVING filter must execute
after aggregate function computation even if it itself contains no
aggregate functions.
before we can invoke fork() -- flush stdio buffers, save and restore the
profiling timer on Linux with LINUX_PROFILE, and handle BeOS stuff. This
patch moves that code into a single function, fork_process(), instead of
duplicating it at the various callsites of fork().
This patch doesn't address the EXEC_BACKEND case; there is room for
further cleanup there.
number of palloc calls. This has a salutory impact on plpgsql operations
with record variables (which create and destroy tupdescs constantly)
and probably helps a bit in some other cases too.
Too much space is allocated for tablespace file path, I guess the
directory name used to be "pg_tablespaces" instead of "pg_tblspc" at
some point.
Heikki Linnakangas
on-the-fly, and thereby avoid blowing out memory when the planner has
underestimated the hash table size. Hash join will now obey the
work_mem limit with some faithfulness. Per my recent proposal
(hash aggregate part isn't done yet though).
the freelist, plus per-buffer spinlocks that protect access to individual
shared buffer headers. This requires abandoning a global freelist (since
the freelist is a global contention point), which shoots down ARC and 2Q
as well as plain LRU management. Adopt a clock sweep algorithm instead.
Preliminary results show substantial improvement in multi-backend situations.
of AND and OR clauses. The key point here is that an OR on the
predicate side has to be treated gingerly: we may be able to prove
that the OR is implied even when no one of its components is implied.
For example (x OR y) implies (x OR y OR z) even though no one of x,
y, or z can be individually proven. This code handles both the
example shown recently by Sergey Koshcheyev and the one shown last
October by Dawid Kuroczko.
no held locks. This maintains the invariant that proclocks are present
only for procs that are holding or awaiting a lock; when this is not
true, LockRelease will fail. Per report from Stephen Clouse.
indexscans involving partial indexes. These would always be dominated
by a simple indexscan on such an index, so there's no point in considering
them. Fixes overoptimism in a patch I applied last October.
it was in 7.4, and add some comments explaining why it has to be this way.
I broke it for OR'd index predicates in a fit of code cleanup last summer.
Per example from Sergey Koshcheyev.
adjusting values:
> But to be on the safe side, it would make sense to do something similar
> to the BSD section, and comment about older distributions maybe needing
> to manipulate /proc/kernel/* directly.
Mark Kirkwood
Neil Conway