Mention DROP TABLE as well as ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT
... when talking about how good they are in replacement of bulk DELETE in partitioned setups. The original wording was a bit confusing. Per an observation from David Wheeler.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c3ad1e8dbd
commit
fc7e99872c
@ -2332,7 +2332,8 @@ VALUES ('New York', NULL, NULL, 'NY');
|
|||||||
<para>
|
<para>
|
||||||
Bulk loads and deletes can be accomplished by adding or removing
|
Bulk loads and deletes can be accomplished by adding or removing
|
||||||
partitions, if that requirement is planned into the partitioning design.
|
partitions, if that requirement is planned into the partitioning design.
|
||||||
<command>ALTER TABLE</> is far faster than a bulk operation.
|
<command>ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT</> and <command>DROP TABLE</> are
|
||||||
|
both far faster than a bulk operation.
|
||||||
It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>
|
It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>
|
||||||
overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.
|
overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.
|
||||||
</para>
|
</para>
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user