Fix more issues with dependency handling at swap phase of REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
When canceling a REINDEX CONCURRENTLY operation after swapping is done, a drop of the parent table would leave behind old indexes. This is a consequence of 68ac9cf, which fixed the case of pg_depend bloat when repeating REINDEX CONCURRENTLY on the same relation. In order to take care of the problem without breaking the previous fix, this uses a different strategy, possible even with the exiting set of routines to handle dependency changes. The dependencies of/on the new index are additionally switched to the old one, allowing an old invalid index remaining around because of a cancellation or a failure to use the dependency links of the concurrently-created index. This ensures that dropping any objects the old invalid index depends on also drops the old index automatically. Reported-by: Julien Rouhaud Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200227080735.l32fqcauy73lon7o@nol Backpatch-through: 12
This commit is contained in:
parent
c954d49046
commit
fbcf087112
@ -1675,12 +1675,13 @@ index_concurrently_swap(Oid newIndexId, Oid oldIndexId, const char *oldName)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Move all dependencies of and on the old index to the new one. First
|
||||
* remove any dependencies that the new index may have to provide an
|
||||
* initial clean state for the dependency switch, and then move all the
|
||||
* dependencies from the old index to the new one.
|
||||
* Swap all dependencies of and on the old index to the new one, and
|
||||
* vice-versa. Note that a call to CommandCounterIncrement() would cause
|
||||
* duplicate entries in pg_depend, so this should not be done.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
deleteDependencyRecordsFor(RelationRelationId, newIndexId, false);
|
||||
changeDependenciesOf(RelationRelationId, newIndexId, oldIndexId);
|
||||
changeDependenciesOn(RelationRelationId, newIndexId, oldIndexId);
|
||||
|
||||
changeDependenciesOf(RelationRelationId, oldIndexId, newIndexId);
|
||||
changeDependenciesOn(RelationRelationId, oldIndexId, newIndexId);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user