Improve log pattern detection in recently-added TAP tests
ab55d74 has introduced some tests with rows found as missing in logical replication subscriptions for partitioned tables, relying on a logic with a lookup of the logs generated, scanning the whole file. This commit makes the logic more precise, by scanning the logs only from the position before the key queries are run to the position where we check for the logs. This will reduce the risk of issues with log patterns overlapping with each other if those tests get more complicated in the future. Per discussion with Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YMP+Gx2S8meYYHW4@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 13
This commit is contained in:
parent
f865d2affc
commit
fad9c8e93a
@ -211,13 +211,18 @@ $node_subscriber->reload;
|
||||
|
||||
$node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM tab_full_pk");
|
||||
|
||||
# Note that the current location of the log file is not grabbed immediately
|
||||
# after reloading the configuration, but after sending one SQL command to
|
||||
# the node so as we are sure that the reloading has taken effect.
|
||||
my $log_location = -s $node_subscriber->logfile;
|
||||
|
||||
$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres',
|
||||
"UPDATE tab_full_pk SET b = 'quux' WHERE a = 1");
|
||||
$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM tab_full_pk WHERE a = 2");
|
||||
|
||||
$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('tap_sub');
|
||||
|
||||
my $logfile = slurp_file($node_subscriber->logfile());
|
||||
my $logfile = slurp_file($node_subscriber->logfile, $log_location);
|
||||
ok( $logfile =~
|
||||
qr/logical replication did not find row to be updated in replication target relation "tab_full_pk"/,
|
||||
'update target row is missing');
|
||||
|
@ -359,6 +359,11 @@ $node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('sub2');
|
||||
|
||||
$node_subscriber1->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM tab1");
|
||||
|
||||
# Note that the current location of the log file is not grabbed immediately
|
||||
# after reloading the configuration, but after sending one SQL command to
|
||||
# the node so as we are sure that the reloading has taken effect.
|
||||
my $log_location = -s $node_subscriber1->logfile;
|
||||
|
||||
$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres',
|
||||
"UPDATE tab1 SET b = 'quux' WHERE a = 4");
|
||||
$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM tab1");
|
||||
@ -366,7 +371,7 @@ $node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM tab1");
|
||||
$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('sub1');
|
||||
$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('sub2');
|
||||
|
||||
my $logfile = slurp_file($node_subscriber1->logfile());
|
||||
my $logfile = slurp_file($node_subscriber1->logfile(), $log_location);
|
||||
ok( $logfile =~
|
||||
qr/logical replication did not find row to be updated in replication target relation's partition "tab1_2_2"/,
|
||||
'update target row is missing in tab1_2_2');
|
||||
@ -697,6 +702,11 @@ $node_subscriber1->reload;
|
||||
|
||||
$node_subscriber1->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM tab2");
|
||||
|
||||
# Note that the current location of the log file is not grabbed immediately
|
||||
# after reloading the configuration, but after sending one SQL command to
|
||||
# the node so as we are sure that the reloading has taken effect.
|
||||
$log_location = -s $node_subscriber1->logfile;
|
||||
|
||||
$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres',
|
||||
"UPDATE tab2 SET b = 'quux' WHERE a = 5");
|
||||
$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM tab2 WHERE a = 1");
|
||||
@ -704,7 +714,7 @@ $node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM tab2 WHERE a = 1");
|
||||
$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('sub_viaroot');
|
||||
$node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('sub2');
|
||||
|
||||
$logfile = slurp_file($node_subscriber1->logfile());
|
||||
$logfile = slurp_file($node_subscriber1->logfile(), $log_location);
|
||||
ok( $logfile =~
|
||||
qr/logical replication did not find row to be updated in replication target relation's partition "tab2_1"/,
|
||||
'update target row is missing in tab2_1');
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user