Improve documentation of EXTRACT(WEEK).
The docs showed that early-January dates can be considered part of the previous year for week-counting purposes, but failed to say explicitly that late-December dates can also be considered part of the next year. Fix that, and add a cross-reference to the "isoyear" field. Per bug #7967 from Pawel Kobylak.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e016b72411
commit
e39feb1006
@ -7151,16 +7151,19 @@ SELECT EXTRACT(SECOND FROM TIME '17:12:28.5');
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The number of the week of the year that the day is in. By definition
|
||||
(<acronym>ISO</acronym> 8601), the first week of a year
|
||||
contains January 4 of that year. (The <acronym>ISO</acronym>-8601
|
||||
week starts on Monday.) In other words, the first Thursday of
|
||||
a year is in week 1 of that year.
|
||||
(<acronym>ISO</acronym> 8601), weeks start on Mondays and the first
|
||||
week of a year contains January 4 of that year. In other words, the
|
||||
first Thursday of a year is in week 1 of that year.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Because of this, it is possible for early January dates to be part of the
|
||||
52nd or 53rd week of the previous year. For example, <literal>2005-01-01</>
|
||||
is part of the 53rd week of year 2004, and <literal>2006-01-01</> is part of
|
||||
the 52nd week of year 2005.
|
||||
In the ISO definition, it is possible for early-January dates to be
|
||||
part of the 52nd or 53rd week of the previous year, and for
|
||||
late-December dates to be part of the first week of the next year.
|
||||
For example, <literal>2005-01-01</> is part of the 53rd week of year
|
||||
2004, and <literal>2006-01-01</> is part of the 52nd week of year
|
||||
2005, while <literal>2012-12-31</> is part of the first week of 2013.
|
||||
It's recommended to use the <literal>isoyear</> field together with
|
||||
<literal>week</> to get consistent results.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<screen>
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user