Wups, managed to break ANALYZE with one aspect of that heap_fetch change.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f4d488022
commit
de09da547a
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c,v 1.136 2002/05/24 18:57:55 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c,v 1.137 2002/05/24 19:52:43 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* INTERFACE ROUTINES
|
||||
@ -873,15 +873,24 @@ heap_getnext(HeapScanDesc scan, ScanDirection direction)
|
||||
* the tuple, fill in the remaining fields of *tuple, and check the tuple
|
||||
* against the specified snapshot.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If successful (tuple passes snapshot time qual), then *userbuf is set to
|
||||
* the buffer holding the tuple and TRUE is returned. The caller must
|
||||
* unpin the buffer when done with the tuple.
|
||||
* If successful (tuple found and passes snapshot time qual), then *userbuf
|
||||
* is set to the buffer holding the tuple and TRUE is returned. The caller
|
||||
* must unpin the buffer when done with the tuple.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If the tuple fails the time qual check, then FALSE will be returned.
|
||||
* When the caller specifies keep_buf = true, we retain the pin on the
|
||||
* buffer and return it in *userbuf (so the caller can still access the
|
||||
* tuple); when keep_buf = false, the pin is released and *userbuf is set
|
||||
* If the tuple is not found, then tuple->t_data is set to NULL, *userbuf
|
||||
* is set to InvalidBuffer, and FALSE is returned.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If the tuple is found but fails the time qual check, then FALSE will be
|
||||
* returned. When the caller specifies keep_buf = true, we retain the pin
|
||||
* on the buffer and return it in *userbuf (so the caller can still access
|
||||
* the tuple); when keep_buf = false, the pin is released and *userbuf is set
|
||||
* to InvalidBuffer.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It is somewhat inconsistent that we elog() on invalid block number but
|
||||
* return false on invalid item number. This is historical. The only
|
||||
* justification I can see is that the caller can relatively easily check the
|
||||
* block number for validity, but cannot check the item number without reading
|
||||
* the page himself.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool
|
||||
heap_fetch(Relation relation,
|
||||
@ -928,17 +937,18 @@ heap_fetch(Relation relation,
|
||||
lp = PageGetItemId(dp, offnum);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* more sanity checks
|
||||
* must check for deleted tuple (see for example analyze.c, which is
|
||||
* careful to pass an offnum in range, but doesn't know if the offnum
|
||||
* actually corresponds to an undeleted tuple).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!ItemIdIsUsed(lp))
|
||||
{
|
||||
LockBuffer(buffer, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK);
|
||||
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
|
||||
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "heap_fetch: invalid tuple id (%s, %lu, %u)",
|
||||
RelationGetRelationName(relation),
|
||||
(unsigned long) ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(tid),
|
||||
offnum);
|
||||
*userbuf = InvalidBuffer;
|
||||
tuple->t_datamcxt = NULL;
|
||||
tuple->t_data = NULL;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/access/index/indexam.c,v 1.59 2002/05/24 18:57:55 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/access/index/indexam.c,v 1.60 2002/05/24 19:52:43 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
* INTERFACE ROUTINES
|
||||
* index_open - open an index relation by relation OID
|
||||
@ -444,6 +444,10 @@ index_getnext(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanDirection direction)
|
||||
&scan->xs_pgstat_info))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Skip if no tuple at this location */
|
||||
if (heapTuple->t_data == NULL)
|
||||
continue; /* should we raise an error instead? */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we can't see it, maybe no one else can either. Check to see
|
||||
* if the tuple is dead to all transactions. If so, signal the
|
||||
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c,v 1.91 2002/05/24 18:57:55 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c,v 1.92 2002/05/24 19:52:43 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ _bt_check_unique(Relation rel, BTItem btitem, Relation heapRel,
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "Cannot insert a duplicate key into unique index %s",
|
||||
RelationGetRelationName(rel));
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
else if (htup.t_data != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Hmm, if we can't see the tuple, maybe it can be
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user