Revert "For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations."
This reverts commit 95c5acb3fc261067ab65ddc0b2dca8e162f09442 (v17) and counterparts in each other non-master branch. If released, that commit would have caused a worst-in-years minor release regression, via undetected LWLock self-deadlock. This commit and its self-deadlock fix warrant more bake time in the master branch. Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10ec0bc3-5933-1189-6bb8-5dec4114558e@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
f343d8f9a4
commit
dd5b957c5a
@ -6355,24 +6355,6 @@ heap_inplace_update_and_unlock(Relation relation,
|
||||
if (oldlen != newlen || htup->t_hoff != tuple->t_data->t_hoff)
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "wrong tuple length");
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Construct shared cache inval if necessary. Note that because we only
|
||||
* pass the new version of the tuple, this mustn't be used for any
|
||||
* operations that could change catcache lookup keys. But we aren't
|
||||
* bothering with index updates either, so that's true a fortiori.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace(relation, tuple, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Unlink relcache init files as needed. If unlinking, acquire
|
||||
* RelCacheInitLock until after associated invalidations. By doing this
|
||||
* in advance, if we checkpoint and then crash between inplace
|
||||
* XLogInsert() and inval, we don't rely on StartupXLOG() ->
|
||||
* RelationCacheInitFileRemove(). That uses elevel==LOG, so replay would
|
||||
* neglect to PANIC on EIO.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
PreInplace_Inval();
|
||||
|
||||
/* NO EREPORT(ERROR) from here till changes are logged */
|
||||
START_CRIT_SECTION();
|
||||
|
||||
@ -6416,28 +6398,17 @@ heap_inplace_update_and_unlock(Relation relation,
|
||||
PageSetLSN(BufferGetPage(buffer), recptr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LockBuffer(buffer, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Send invalidations to shared queue. SearchSysCacheLocked1() assumes we
|
||||
* do this before UnlockTuple().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If we're mutating a tuple visible only to this transaction, there's an
|
||||
* equivalent transactional inval from the action that created the tuple,
|
||||
* and this inval is superfluous.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
AtInplace_Inval();
|
||||
|
||||
END_CRIT_SECTION();
|
||||
UnlockTuple(relation, &tuple->t_self, InplaceUpdateTupleLock);
|
||||
|
||||
AcceptInvalidationMessages(); /* local processing of just-sent inval */
|
||||
heap_inplace_unlock(relation, oldtup, buffer);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Queue a transactional inval. The immediate invalidation we just sent
|
||||
* is the only one known to be necessary. To reduce risk from the
|
||||
* transition to immediate invalidation, continue sending a transactional
|
||||
* invalidation like we've long done. Third-party code might rely on it.
|
||||
* Send out shared cache inval if necessary. Note that because we only
|
||||
* pass the new version of the tuple, this mustn't be used for any
|
||||
* operations that could change catcache lookup keys. But we aren't
|
||||
* bothering with index updates either, so that's true a fortiori.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXX ROLLBACK discards the invalidation. See test inplace-inval.spec.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!IsBootstrapProcessingMode())
|
||||
CacheInvalidateHeapTuple(relation, tuple, NULL);
|
||||
|
@ -1358,24 +1358,14 @@ RecordTransactionCommit(void)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Transactions without an assigned xid can contain invalidation
|
||||
* messages. While inplace updates do this, this is not known to be
|
||||
* necessary; see comment at inplace CacheInvalidateHeapTuple().
|
||||
* Extensions might still rely on this capability, and standbys may
|
||||
* need to process those invals. We can't emit a commit record
|
||||
* without an xid, and we don't want to force assigning an xid,
|
||||
* because that'd be problematic for e.g. vacuum. Hence we emit a
|
||||
* bespoke record for the invalidations. We don't want to use that in
|
||||
* case a commit record is emitted, so they happen synchronously with
|
||||
* commits (besides not wanting to emit more WAL records).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXX Every known use of this capability is a defect. Since an XID
|
||||
* isn't controlling visibility of the change that prompted invals,
|
||||
* other sessions need the inval even if this transactions aborts.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS does a nontransactional index_build(), which
|
||||
* queues a relcache inval, including in transactions without an xid
|
||||
* that had read the (empty) table. Standbys don't need any ON COMMIT
|
||||
* DELETE ROWS invals, but we've not done the work to withhold them.
|
||||
* messages (e.g. explicit relcache invalidations or catcache
|
||||
* invalidations for inplace updates); standbys need to process those.
|
||||
* We can't emit a commit record without an xid, and we don't want to
|
||||
* force assigning an xid, because that'd be problematic for e.g.
|
||||
* vacuum. Hence we emit a bespoke record for the invalidations. We
|
||||
* don't want to use that in case a commit record is emitted, so they
|
||||
* happen synchronously with commits (besides not wanting to emit more
|
||||
* WAL records).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (nmsgs != 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -2889,19 +2889,12 @@ index_update_stats(Relation rel,
|
||||
if (dirty)
|
||||
{
|
||||
systable_inplace_update_finish(state, tuple);
|
||||
/* the above sends transactional and immediate cache inval messages */
|
||||
/* the above sends a cache inval message */
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
systable_inplace_update_cancel(state);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* While we didn't change relhasindex, CREATE INDEX needs a
|
||||
* transactional inval for when the new index's catalog rows become
|
||||
* visible. Other CREATE INDEX and REINDEX code happens to also queue
|
||||
* this inval, but keep this in case rare callers rely on this part of
|
||||
* our API contract.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* no need to change tuple, but force relcache inval anyway */
|
||||
CacheInvalidateRelcacheByTuple(tuple);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -975,6 +975,11 @@ EventTriggerOnLogin(void)
|
||||
* this instead of regular updates serves two purposes. First,
|
||||
* that avoids possible waiting on the row-level lock. Second,
|
||||
* that avoids dealing with TOAST.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Changes made by inplace update may be lost due to
|
||||
* concurrent normal updates; see inplace-inval.spec. However,
|
||||
* we are OK with that. The subsequent connections will still
|
||||
* have a chance to set "dathasloginevt" to false.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
systable_inplace_update_finish(state, tuple);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -508,19 +508,23 @@ heap_decode(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx, XLogRecordBuffer *buf)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Inplace updates are only ever performed on catalog tuples and
|
||||
* can, per definition, not change tuple visibility. Inplace
|
||||
* updates don't affect storage or interpretation of table rows,
|
||||
* so they don't affect logicalrep_write_tuple() outcomes. Hence,
|
||||
* we don't process invalidations from the original operation. If
|
||||
* inplace updates did affect those things, invalidations wouldn't
|
||||
* make it work, since there are no snapshot-specific versions of
|
||||
* inplace-updated values. Since we also don't decode catalog
|
||||
* tuples, we're not interested in the record's contents.
|
||||
* can, per definition, not change tuple visibility. Since we
|
||||
* don't decode catalog tuples, we're not interested in the
|
||||
* record's contents.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* WAL contains likely-unnecessary commit-time invals from the
|
||||
* CacheInvalidateHeapTuple() call in heap_inplace_update().
|
||||
* Excess invalidation is safe.
|
||||
* In-place updates can be used either by XID-bearing transactions
|
||||
* (e.g. in CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY) or by XID-less
|
||||
* transactions (e.g. VACUUM). In the former case, the commit
|
||||
* record will include cache invalidations, so we mark the
|
||||
* transaction as catalog modifying here. Currently that's
|
||||
* redundant because the commit will do that as well, but once we
|
||||
* support decoding in-progress relations, this will be important.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!TransactionIdIsValid(xid))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
(void) SnapBuildProcessChange(builder, xid, buf->origptr);
|
||||
ReorderBufferXidSetCatalogChanges(ctx->reorder, xid, buf->origptr);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case XLOG_HEAP_CONFIRM:
|
||||
|
7
src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c
vendored
7
src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c
vendored
@ -2288,8 +2288,7 @@ void
|
||||
PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(Relation relation,
|
||||
HeapTuple tuple,
|
||||
HeapTuple newtuple,
|
||||
void (*function) (int, uint32, Oid, void *),
|
||||
void *context)
|
||||
void (*function) (int, uint32, Oid))
|
||||
{
|
||||
slist_iter iter;
|
||||
Oid reloid;
|
||||
@ -2330,7 +2329,7 @@ PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(Relation relation,
|
||||
hashvalue = CatalogCacheComputeTupleHashValue(ccp, ccp->cc_nkeys, tuple);
|
||||
dbid = ccp->cc_relisshared ? (Oid) 0 : MyDatabaseId;
|
||||
|
||||
(*function) (ccp->id, hashvalue, dbid, context);
|
||||
(*function) (ccp->id, hashvalue, dbid);
|
||||
|
||||
if (newtuple)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -2339,7 +2338,7 @@ PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(Relation relation,
|
||||
newhashvalue = CatalogCacheComputeTupleHashValue(ccp, ccp->cc_nkeys, newtuple);
|
||||
|
||||
if (newhashvalue != hashvalue)
|
||||
(*function) (ccp->id, newhashvalue, dbid, context);
|
||||
(*function) (ccp->id, newhashvalue, dbid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
302
src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c
vendored
302
src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c
vendored
@ -94,10 +94,6 @@
|
||||
* worth trying to avoid sending such inval traffic in the future, if those
|
||||
* problems can be overcome cheaply.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When making a nontransactional change to a cacheable object, we must
|
||||
* likewise send the invalidation immediately, before ending the change's
|
||||
* critical section. This includes inplace heap updates, relmap, and smgr.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When wal_level=logical, write invalidations into WAL at each command end to
|
||||
* support the decoding of the in-progress transactions. See
|
||||
* CommandEndInvalidationMessages.
|
||||
@ -134,15 +130,13 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Pending requests are stored as ready-to-send SharedInvalidationMessages.
|
||||
* We keep the messages themselves in arrays in TopTransactionContext (there
|
||||
* are separate arrays for catcache and relcache messages). For transactional
|
||||
* messages, control information is kept in a chain of TransInvalidationInfo
|
||||
* structs, also allocated in TopTransactionContext. (We could keep a
|
||||
* subtransaction's TransInvalidationInfo in its CurTransactionContext; but
|
||||
* that's more wasteful not less so, since in very many scenarios it'd be the
|
||||
* only allocation in the subtransaction's CurTransactionContext.) For
|
||||
* inplace update messages, control information appears in an
|
||||
* InvalidationInfo, allocated in CurrentMemoryContext.
|
||||
* We keep the messages themselves in arrays in TopTransactionContext
|
||||
* (there are separate arrays for catcache and relcache messages). Control
|
||||
* information is kept in a chain of TransInvalidationInfo structs, also
|
||||
* allocated in TopTransactionContext. (We could keep a subtransaction's
|
||||
* TransInvalidationInfo in its CurTransactionContext; but that's more
|
||||
* wasteful not less so, since in very many scenarios it'd be the only
|
||||
* allocation in the subtransaction's CurTransactionContext.)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We can store the message arrays densely, and yet avoid moving data around
|
||||
* within an array, because within any one subtransaction we need only
|
||||
@ -153,9 +147,7 @@
|
||||
* struct. Similarly, we need distinguish messages of prior subtransactions
|
||||
* from those of the current subtransaction only until the subtransaction
|
||||
* completes, after which we adjust the array indexes in the parent's
|
||||
* TransInvalidationInfo to include the subtransaction's messages. Inplace
|
||||
* invalidations don't need a concept of command or subtransaction boundaries,
|
||||
* since we send them during the WAL insertion critical section.
|
||||
* TransInvalidationInfo to include the subtransaction's messages.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The ordering of the individual messages within a command's or
|
||||
* subtransaction's output is not considered significant, although this
|
||||
@ -208,7 +200,7 @@ typedef struct InvalidationMsgsGroup
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*----------------
|
||||
* Transactional invalidation messages are divided into two groups:
|
||||
* Invalidation messages are divided into two groups:
|
||||
* 1) events so far in current command, not yet reflected to caches.
|
||||
* 2) events in previous commands of current transaction; these have
|
||||
* been reflected to local caches, and must be either broadcast to
|
||||
@ -224,36 +216,26 @@ typedef struct InvalidationMsgsGroup
|
||||
*----------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/* fields common to both transactional and inplace invalidation */
|
||||
typedef struct InvalidationInfo
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Events emitted by current command */
|
||||
InvalidationMsgsGroup CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs;
|
||||
|
||||
/* init file must be invalidated? */
|
||||
bool RelcacheInitFileInval;
|
||||
} InvalidationInfo;
|
||||
|
||||
/* subclass adding fields specific to transactional invalidation */
|
||||
typedef struct TransInvalidationInfo
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Base class */
|
||||
struct InvalidationInfo ii;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Events emitted by previous commands of this (sub)transaction */
|
||||
InvalidationMsgsGroup PriorCmdInvalidMsgs;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Back link to parent transaction's info */
|
||||
struct TransInvalidationInfo *parent;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Subtransaction nesting depth */
|
||||
int my_level;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Events emitted by current command */
|
||||
InvalidationMsgsGroup CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Events emitted by previous commands of this (sub)transaction */
|
||||
InvalidationMsgsGroup PriorCmdInvalidMsgs;
|
||||
|
||||
/* init file must be invalidated? */
|
||||
bool RelcacheInitFileInval;
|
||||
} TransInvalidationInfo;
|
||||
|
||||
static TransInvalidationInfo *transInvalInfo = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
static InvalidationInfo *inplaceInvalInfo = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* GUC storage */
|
||||
int debug_discard_caches = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -561,12 +543,9 @@ ProcessInvalidationMessagesMulti(InvalidationMsgsGroup *group,
|
||||
static void
|
||||
RegisterCatcacheInvalidation(int cacheId,
|
||||
uint32 hashValue,
|
||||
Oid dbId,
|
||||
void *context)
|
||||
Oid dbId)
|
||||
{
|
||||
InvalidationInfo *info = (InvalidationInfo *) context;
|
||||
|
||||
AddCatcacheInvalidationMessage(&info->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
AddCatcacheInvalidationMessage(&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
cacheId, hashValue, dbId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -576,9 +555,10 @@ RegisterCatcacheInvalidation(int cacheId,
|
||||
* Register an invalidation event for all catcache entries from a catalog.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
RegisterCatalogInvalidation(InvalidationInfo *info, Oid dbId, Oid catId)
|
||||
RegisterCatalogInvalidation(Oid dbId, Oid catId)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddCatalogInvalidationMessage(&info->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs, dbId, catId);
|
||||
AddCatalogInvalidationMessage(&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
dbId, catId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -587,9 +567,10 @@ RegisterCatalogInvalidation(InvalidationInfo *info, Oid dbId, Oid catId)
|
||||
* As above, but register a relcache invalidation event.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(InvalidationInfo *info, Oid dbId, Oid relId)
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(Oid dbId, Oid relId)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddRelcacheInvalidationMessage(&info->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs, dbId, relId);
|
||||
AddRelcacheInvalidationMessage(&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
dbId, relId);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Most of the time, relcache invalidation is associated with system
|
||||
@ -606,7 +587,7 @@ RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(InvalidationInfo *info, Oid dbId, Oid relId)
|
||||
* as well. Also zap when we are invalidating whole relcache.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (relId == InvalidOid || RelationIdIsInInitFile(relId))
|
||||
info->RelcacheInitFileInval = true;
|
||||
transInvalInfo->RelcacheInitFileInval = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -616,27 +597,24 @@ RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(InvalidationInfo *info, Oid dbId, Oid relId)
|
||||
* Only needed for catalogs that don't have catcaches.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
RegisterSnapshotInvalidation(InvalidationInfo *info, Oid dbId, Oid relId)
|
||||
RegisterSnapshotInvalidation(Oid dbId, Oid relId)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddSnapshotInvalidationMessage(&info->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs, dbId, relId);
|
||||
AddSnapshotInvalidationMessage(&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
dbId, relId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* PrepareInvalidationState
|
||||
* Initialize inval data for the current (sub)transaction.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static InvalidationInfo *
|
||||
static void
|
||||
PrepareInvalidationState(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
TransInvalidationInfo *myInfo;
|
||||
|
||||
Assert(IsTransactionState());
|
||||
/* Can't queue transactional message while collecting inplace messages. */
|
||||
Assert(inplaceInvalInfo == NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (transInvalInfo != NULL &&
|
||||
transInvalInfo->my_level == GetCurrentTransactionNestLevel())
|
||||
return (InvalidationInfo *) transInvalInfo;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
myInfo = (TransInvalidationInfo *)
|
||||
MemoryContextAllocZero(TopTransactionContext,
|
||||
@ -659,7 +637,7 @@ PrepareInvalidationState(void)
|
||||
* counter. This is a convenient place to check for that, as well as
|
||||
* being important to keep management of the message arrays simple.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (NumMessagesInGroup(&transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs) != 0)
|
||||
if (NumMessagesInGroup(&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs) != 0)
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "cannot start a subtransaction when there are unprocessed inval messages");
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -668,8 +646,8 @@ PrepareInvalidationState(void)
|
||||
* to update them to follow whatever is already in the arrays.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SetGroupToFollow(&myInfo->PriorCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
&transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
SetGroupToFollow(&myInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
SetGroupToFollow(&myInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
&myInfo->PriorCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -685,41 +663,6 @@ PrepareInvalidationState(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
transInvalInfo = myInfo;
|
||||
return (InvalidationInfo *) myInfo;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* PrepareInplaceInvalidationState
|
||||
* Initialize inval data for an inplace update.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* See previous function for more background.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static InvalidationInfo *
|
||||
PrepareInplaceInvalidationState(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
InvalidationInfo *myInfo;
|
||||
|
||||
Assert(IsTransactionState());
|
||||
/* limit of one inplace update under assembly */
|
||||
Assert(inplaceInvalInfo == NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* gone after WAL insertion CritSection ends, so use current context */
|
||||
myInfo = (InvalidationInfo *) palloc0(sizeof(InvalidationInfo));
|
||||
|
||||
/* Stash our messages past end of the transactional messages, if any. */
|
||||
if (transInvalInfo != NULL)
|
||||
SetGroupToFollow(&myInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
&transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
InvalMessageArrays[CatCacheMsgs].msgs = NULL;
|
||||
InvalMessageArrays[CatCacheMsgs].maxmsgs = 0;
|
||||
InvalMessageArrays[RelCacheMsgs].msgs = NULL;
|
||||
InvalMessageArrays[RelCacheMsgs].maxmsgs = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inplaceInvalInfo = myInfo;
|
||||
return myInfo;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
@ -959,7 +902,7 @@ xactGetCommittedInvalidationMessages(SharedInvalidationMessage **msgs,
|
||||
* after we send the SI messages. However, we need not do anything unless
|
||||
* we committed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
*RelcacheInitFileInval = transInvalInfo->ii.RelcacheInitFileInval;
|
||||
*RelcacheInitFileInval = transInvalInfo->RelcacheInitFileInval;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Collect all the pending messages into a single contiguous array of
|
||||
@ -970,7 +913,7 @@ xactGetCommittedInvalidationMessages(SharedInvalidationMessage **msgs,
|
||||
* not new ones.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
nummsgs = NumMessagesInGroup(&transInvalInfo->PriorCmdInvalidMsgs) +
|
||||
NumMessagesInGroup(&transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
NumMessagesInGroup(&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
|
||||
*msgs = msgarray = (SharedInvalidationMessage *)
|
||||
MemoryContextAlloc(CurTransactionContext,
|
||||
@ -983,7 +926,7 @@ xactGetCommittedInvalidationMessages(SharedInvalidationMessage **msgs,
|
||||
msgs,
|
||||
n * sizeof(SharedInvalidationMessage)),
|
||||
nmsgs += n));
|
||||
ProcessMessageSubGroupMulti(&transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
ProcessMessageSubGroupMulti(&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
CatCacheMsgs,
|
||||
(memcpy(msgarray + nmsgs,
|
||||
msgs,
|
||||
@ -995,7 +938,7 @@ xactGetCommittedInvalidationMessages(SharedInvalidationMessage **msgs,
|
||||
msgs,
|
||||
n * sizeof(SharedInvalidationMessage)),
|
||||
nmsgs += n));
|
||||
ProcessMessageSubGroupMulti(&transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
ProcessMessageSubGroupMulti(&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
RelCacheMsgs,
|
||||
(memcpy(msgarray + nmsgs,
|
||||
msgs,
|
||||
@ -1081,9 +1024,7 @@ ProcessCommittedInvalidationMessages(SharedInvalidationMessage *msgs,
|
||||
void
|
||||
AtEOXact_Inval(bool isCommit)
|
||||
{
|
||||
inplaceInvalInfo = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Quick exit if no transactional messages */
|
||||
/* Quick exit if no messages */
|
||||
if (transInvalInfo == NULL)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1097,16 +1038,16 @@ AtEOXact_Inval(bool isCommit)
|
||||
* after we send the SI messages. However, we need not do anything
|
||||
* unless we committed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (transInvalInfo->ii.RelcacheInitFileInval)
|
||||
if (transInvalInfo->RelcacheInitFileInval)
|
||||
RelationCacheInitFilePreInvalidate();
|
||||
|
||||
AppendInvalidationMessages(&transInvalInfo->PriorCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
&transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
|
||||
ProcessInvalidationMessagesMulti(&transInvalInfo->PriorCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
SendSharedInvalidMessages);
|
||||
|
||||
if (transInvalInfo->ii.RelcacheInitFileInval)
|
||||
if (transInvalInfo->RelcacheInitFileInval)
|
||||
RelationCacheInitFilePostInvalidate();
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -1119,44 +1060,6 @@ AtEOXact_Inval(bool isCommit)
|
||||
transInvalInfo = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* PreInplace_Inval
|
||||
* Process queued-up invalidation before inplace update critical section.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Tasks belong here if they are safe even if the inplace update does not
|
||||
* complete. Currently, this just unlinks a cache file, which can fail. The
|
||||
* sum of this and AtInplace_Inval() mirrors AtEOXact_Inval(isCommit=true).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
PreInplace_Inval(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert(CritSectionCount == 0);
|
||||
|
||||
if (inplaceInvalInfo && inplaceInvalInfo->RelcacheInitFileInval)
|
||||
RelationCacheInitFilePreInvalidate();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* AtInplace_Inval
|
||||
* Process queued-up invalidations after inplace update buffer mutation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
AtInplace_Inval(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert(CritSectionCount > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
if (inplaceInvalInfo == NULL)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
ProcessInvalidationMessagesMulti(&inplaceInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
SendSharedInvalidMessages);
|
||||
|
||||
if (inplaceInvalInfo->RelcacheInitFileInval)
|
||||
RelationCacheInitFilePostInvalidate();
|
||||
|
||||
inplaceInvalInfo = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* AtEOSubXact_Inval
|
||||
* Process queued-up invalidation messages at end of subtransaction.
|
||||
@ -1179,20 +1082,9 @@ void
|
||||
AtEOSubXact_Inval(bool isCommit)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int my_level;
|
||||
TransInvalidationInfo *myInfo;
|
||||
TransInvalidationInfo *myInfo = transInvalInfo;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Successful inplace update must clear this, but we clear it on abort.
|
||||
* Inplace updates allocate this in CurrentMemoryContext, which has
|
||||
* lifespan <= subtransaction lifespan. Hence, don't free it explicitly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (isCommit)
|
||||
Assert(inplaceInvalInfo == NULL);
|
||||
else
|
||||
inplaceInvalInfo = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Quick exit if no transactional messages. */
|
||||
myInfo = transInvalInfo;
|
||||
/* Quick exit if no messages. */
|
||||
if (myInfo == NULL)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1233,12 +1125,12 @@ AtEOSubXact_Inval(bool isCommit)
|
||||
&myInfo->PriorCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Must readjust parent's CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs indexes now */
|
||||
SetGroupToFollow(&myInfo->parent->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
SetGroupToFollow(&myInfo->parent->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
&myInfo->parent->PriorCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Pending relcache inval becomes parent's problem too */
|
||||
if (myInfo->ii.RelcacheInitFileInval)
|
||||
myInfo->parent->ii.RelcacheInitFileInval = true;
|
||||
if (myInfo->RelcacheInitFileInval)
|
||||
myInfo->parent->RelcacheInitFileInval = true;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Pop the transaction state stack */
|
||||
transInvalInfo = myInfo->parent;
|
||||
@ -1285,7 +1177,7 @@ CommandEndInvalidationMessages(void)
|
||||
if (transInvalInfo == NULL)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
ProcessInvalidationMessages(&transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
ProcessInvalidationMessages(&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
LocalExecuteInvalidationMessage);
|
||||
|
||||
/* WAL Log per-command invalidation messages for wal_level=logical */
|
||||
@ -1293,21 +1185,26 @@ CommandEndInvalidationMessages(void)
|
||||
LogLogicalInvalidations();
|
||||
|
||||
AppendInvalidationMessages(&transInvalInfo->PriorCmdInvalidMsgs,
|
||||
&transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
&transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* CacheInvalidateHeapTupleCommon
|
||||
* Common logic for end-of-command and inplace variants.
|
||||
* CacheInvalidateHeapTuple
|
||||
* Register the given tuple for invalidation at end of command
|
||||
* (ie, current command is creating or outdating this tuple).
|
||||
* Also, detect whether a relcache invalidation is implied.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For an insert or delete, tuple is the target tuple and newtuple is NULL.
|
||||
* For an update, we are called just once, with tuple being the old tuple
|
||||
* version and newtuple the new version. This allows avoidance of duplicate
|
||||
* effort during an update.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
CacheInvalidateHeapTupleCommon(Relation relation,
|
||||
void
|
||||
CacheInvalidateHeapTuple(Relation relation,
|
||||
HeapTuple tuple,
|
||||
HeapTuple newtuple,
|
||||
InvalidationInfo *(*prepare_callback) (void))
|
||||
HeapTuple newtuple)
|
||||
{
|
||||
InvalidationInfo *info;
|
||||
Oid tupleRelId;
|
||||
Oid databaseId;
|
||||
Oid relationId;
|
||||
@ -1331,8 +1228,11 @@ CacheInvalidateHeapTupleCommon(Relation relation,
|
||||
if (IsToastRelation(relation))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Allocate any required resources. */
|
||||
info = prepare_callback();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we're not prepared to queue invalidation messages for this
|
||||
* subtransaction level, get ready now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
PrepareInvalidationState();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* First let the catcache do its thing
|
||||
@ -1341,12 +1241,11 @@ CacheInvalidateHeapTupleCommon(Relation relation,
|
||||
if (RelationInvalidatesSnapshotsOnly(tupleRelId))
|
||||
{
|
||||
databaseId = IsSharedRelation(tupleRelId) ? InvalidOid : MyDatabaseId;
|
||||
RegisterSnapshotInvalidation(info, databaseId, tupleRelId);
|
||||
RegisterSnapshotInvalidation(databaseId, tupleRelId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(relation, tuple, newtuple,
|
||||
RegisterCatcacheInvalidation,
|
||||
(void *) info);
|
||||
RegisterCatcacheInvalidation);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now, is this tuple one of the primary definers of a relcache entry? See
|
||||
@ -1419,44 +1318,7 @@ CacheInvalidateHeapTupleCommon(Relation relation,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Yes. We need to register a relcache invalidation event.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(info, databaseId, relationId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* CacheInvalidateHeapTuple
|
||||
* Register the given tuple for invalidation at end of command
|
||||
* (ie, current command is creating or outdating this tuple) and end of
|
||||
* transaction. Also, detect whether a relcache invalidation is implied.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For an insert or delete, tuple is the target tuple and newtuple is NULL.
|
||||
* For an update, we are called just once, with tuple being the old tuple
|
||||
* version and newtuple the new version. This allows avoidance of duplicate
|
||||
* effort during an update.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
CacheInvalidateHeapTuple(Relation relation,
|
||||
HeapTuple tuple,
|
||||
HeapTuple newtuple)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CacheInvalidateHeapTupleCommon(relation, tuple, newtuple,
|
||||
PrepareInvalidationState);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace
|
||||
* Register the given tuple for nontransactional invalidation pertaining
|
||||
* to an inplace update. Also, detect whether a relcache invalidation is
|
||||
* implied.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Like CacheInvalidateHeapTuple(), but for inplace updates.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace(Relation relation,
|
||||
HeapTuple tuple,
|
||||
HeapTuple newtuple)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CacheInvalidateHeapTupleCommon(relation, tuple, newtuple,
|
||||
PrepareInplaceInvalidationState);
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(databaseId, relationId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1475,13 +1337,14 @@ CacheInvalidateCatalog(Oid catalogId)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Oid databaseId;
|
||||
|
||||
PrepareInvalidationState();
|
||||
|
||||
if (IsSharedRelation(catalogId))
|
||||
databaseId = InvalidOid;
|
||||
else
|
||||
databaseId = MyDatabaseId;
|
||||
|
||||
RegisterCatalogInvalidation(PrepareInvalidationState(),
|
||||
databaseId, catalogId);
|
||||
RegisterCatalogInvalidation(databaseId, catalogId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1499,14 +1362,15 @@ CacheInvalidateRelcache(Relation relation)
|
||||
Oid databaseId;
|
||||
Oid relationId;
|
||||
|
||||
PrepareInvalidationState();
|
||||
|
||||
relationId = RelationGetRelid(relation);
|
||||
if (relation->rd_rel->relisshared)
|
||||
databaseId = InvalidOid;
|
||||
else
|
||||
databaseId = MyDatabaseId;
|
||||
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(PrepareInvalidationState(),
|
||||
databaseId, relationId);
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(databaseId, relationId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1519,8 +1383,9 @@ CacheInvalidateRelcache(Relation relation)
|
||||
void
|
||||
CacheInvalidateRelcacheAll(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(PrepareInvalidationState(),
|
||||
InvalidOid, InvalidOid);
|
||||
PrepareInvalidationState();
|
||||
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(InvalidOid, InvalidOid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1534,13 +1399,14 @@ CacheInvalidateRelcacheByTuple(HeapTuple classTuple)
|
||||
Oid databaseId;
|
||||
Oid relationId;
|
||||
|
||||
PrepareInvalidationState();
|
||||
|
||||
relationId = classtup->oid;
|
||||
if (classtup->relisshared)
|
||||
databaseId = InvalidOid;
|
||||
else
|
||||
databaseId = MyDatabaseId;
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(PrepareInvalidationState(),
|
||||
databaseId, relationId);
|
||||
RegisterRelcacheInvalidation(databaseId, relationId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1554,6 +1420,8 @@ CacheInvalidateRelcacheByRelid(Oid relid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
HeapTuple tup;
|
||||
|
||||
PrepareInvalidationState();
|
||||
|
||||
tup = SearchSysCache1(RELOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(relid));
|
||||
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tup))
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup failed for relation %u", relid);
|
||||
@ -1743,7 +1611,7 @@ LogLogicalInvalidations(void)
|
||||
if (transInvalInfo == NULL)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
group = &transInvalInfo->ii.CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs;
|
||||
group = &transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs;
|
||||
nmsgs = NumMessagesInGroup(group);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nmsgs > 0)
|
||||
|
3
src/backend/utils/cache/syscache.c
vendored
3
src/backend/utils/cache/syscache.c
vendored
@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ SearchSysCacheLocked1(int cacheId,
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If an inplace update just finished, ensure we process the syscache
|
||||
* inval.
|
||||
* inval. XXX this is insufficient: the inplace updater may not yet
|
||||
* have reached AtEOXact_Inval(). See test at inplace-inval.spec.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If a heap_update() call just released its LOCKTAG_TUPLE, we'll
|
||||
* probably find the old tuple and reach "tuple concurrently updated".
|
||||
|
@ -225,7 +225,6 @@ extern void CatCacheInvalidate(CatCache *cache, uint32 hashValue);
|
||||
extern void PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(Relation relation,
|
||||
HeapTuple tuple,
|
||||
HeapTuple newtuple,
|
||||
void (*function) (int, uint32, Oid, void *),
|
||||
void *context);
|
||||
void (*function) (int, uint32, Oid));
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* CATCACHE_H */
|
||||
|
@ -28,9 +28,6 @@ extern void AcceptInvalidationMessages(void);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void AtEOXact_Inval(bool isCommit);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void PreInplace_Inval(void);
|
||||
extern void AtInplace_Inval(void);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void AtEOSubXact_Inval(bool isCommit);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void PostPrepare_Inval(void);
|
||||
@ -40,9 +37,6 @@ extern void CommandEndInvalidationMessages(void);
|
||||
extern void CacheInvalidateHeapTuple(Relation relation,
|
||||
HeapTuple tuple,
|
||||
HeapTuple newtuple);
|
||||
extern void CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace(Relation relation,
|
||||
HeapTuple tuple,
|
||||
HeapTuple newtuple);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void CacheInvalidateCatalog(Oid catalogId);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
Parsed test spec with 3 sessions
|
||||
|
||||
starting permutation: cachefill3 cir1 cic2 ddl3 read1
|
||||
starting permutation: cachefill3 cir1 cic2 ddl3
|
||||
step cachefill3: TABLE newly_indexed;
|
||||
c
|
||||
-
|
||||
@ -9,14 +9,6 @@ c
|
||||
step cir1: BEGIN; CREATE INDEX i1 ON newly_indexed (c); ROLLBACK;
|
||||
step cic2: CREATE INDEX i2 ON newly_indexed (c);
|
||||
step ddl3: ALTER TABLE newly_indexed ADD extra int;
|
||||
step read1:
|
||||
SELECT relhasindex FROM pg_class WHERE oid = 'newly_indexed'::regclass;
|
||||
|
||||
relhasindex
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
t
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
starting permutation: cir1 cic2 ddl3 read1
|
||||
step cir1: BEGIN; CREATE INDEX i1 ON newly_indexed (c); ROLLBACK;
|
||||
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# An inplace update had been able to abort before sending the inplace
|
||||
# invalidation message to the shared queue. If a heap_update() caller then
|
||||
# retrieved its oldtup from a cache, the heap_update() could revert the
|
||||
# inplace update.
|
||||
# If a heap_update() caller retrieves its oldtup from a cache, it's possible
|
||||
# for that cache entry to predate an inplace update, causing loss of that
|
||||
# inplace update. This arises because the transaction may abort before
|
||||
# sending the inplace invalidation message to the shared queue.
|
||||
|
||||
setup
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -27,12 +27,14 @@ step cachefill3 { TABLE newly_indexed; }
|
||||
step ddl3 { ALTER TABLE newly_indexed ADD extra int; }
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# XXX shows an extant bug. Adding step read1 at the end would usually print
|
||||
# relhasindex=f (not wanted). This does not reach the unwanted behavior under
|
||||
# -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE and friends.
|
||||
permutation
|
||||
cachefill3 # populates the pg_class row in the catcache
|
||||
cir1 # sets relhasindex=true; rollback discards cache inval
|
||||
cic2 # sees relhasindex=true, skips changing it (so no inval)
|
||||
ddl3 # cached row as the oldtup of an update, losing relhasindex
|
||||
read1 # observe damage
|
||||
|
||||
# without cachefill3, no bug
|
||||
permutation cir1 cic2 ddl3 read1
|
||||
|
@ -1253,7 +1253,6 @@ Interval
|
||||
IntervalAggState
|
||||
IntoClause
|
||||
InvalMessageArray
|
||||
InvalidationInfo
|
||||
InvalidationMsgsGroup
|
||||
IpcMemoryId
|
||||
IpcMemoryKey
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user