mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres
Remove volatile qualifiers from proc.c and procarray.c
Prior to commit 0709b7ee72
, access to
variables within a spinlock-protected critical section had to be done
through a volatile pointer, but that should no longer be necessary.
Michael Paquier
This commit is contained in:
parent
430008b5a7
commit
d53e3d5fe0
|
@ -3718,8 +3718,6 @@ static int
|
|||
KnownAssignedXidsGetAndSetXmin(TransactionId *xarray, TransactionId *xmin,
|
||||
TransactionId xmax)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */
|
||||
volatile ProcArrayStruct *pArray = procArray;
|
||||
int count = 0;
|
||||
int head,
|
||||
tail;
|
||||
|
@ -3734,10 +3732,10 @@ KnownAssignedXidsGetAndSetXmin(TransactionId *xarray, TransactionId *xmin,
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Must take spinlock to ensure we see up-to-date array contents.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(&pArray->known_assigned_xids_lck);
|
||||
tail = pArray->tailKnownAssignedXids;
|
||||
head = pArray->headKnownAssignedXids;
|
||||
SpinLockRelease(&pArray->known_assigned_xids_lck);
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(&procArray->known_assigned_xids_lck);
|
||||
tail = procArray->tailKnownAssignedXids;
|
||||
head = procArray->headKnownAssignedXids;
|
||||
SpinLockRelease(&procArray->known_assigned_xids_lck);
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = tail; i < head; i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -3777,8 +3775,6 @@ KnownAssignedXidsGetAndSetXmin(TransactionId *xarray, TransactionId *xmin,
|
|||
static TransactionId
|
||||
KnownAssignedXidsGetOldestXmin(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */
|
||||
volatile ProcArrayStruct *pArray = procArray;
|
||||
int head,
|
||||
tail;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
@ -3786,10 +3782,10 @@ KnownAssignedXidsGetOldestXmin(void)
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Fetch head just once, since it may change while we loop.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(&pArray->known_assigned_xids_lck);
|
||||
tail = pArray->tailKnownAssignedXids;
|
||||
head = pArray->headKnownAssignedXids;
|
||||
SpinLockRelease(&pArray->known_assigned_xids_lck);
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(&procArray->known_assigned_xids_lck);
|
||||
tail = procArray->tailKnownAssignedXids;
|
||||
head = procArray->headKnownAssignedXids;
|
||||
SpinLockRelease(&procArray->known_assigned_xids_lck);
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = tail; i < head; i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -283,15 +283,13 @@ InitProcGlobal(void)
|
|||
void
|
||||
InitProcess(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */
|
||||
volatile PROC_HDR *procglobal = ProcGlobal;
|
||||
PGPROC * volatile * procgloballist;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* ProcGlobal should be set up already (if we are a backend, we inherit
|
||||
* this by fork() or EXEC_BACKEND mechanism from the postmaster).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (procglobal == NULL)
|
||||
if (ProcGlobal == NULL)
|
||||
elog(PANIC, "proc header uninitialized");
|
||||
|
||||
if (MyProc != NULL)
|
||||
|
@ -299,11 +297,11 @@ InitProcess(void)
|
|||
|
||||
/* Decide which list should supply our PGPROC. */
|
||||
if (IsAnyAutoVacuumProcess())
|
||||
procgloballist = &procglobal->autovacFreeProcs;
|
||||
procgloballist = &ProcGlobal->autovacFreeProcs;
|
||||
else if (IsBackgroundWorker)
|
||||
procgloballist = &procglobal->bgworkerFreeProcs;
|
||||
procgloballist = &ProcGlobal->bgworkerFreeProcs;
|
||||
else
|
||||
procgloballist = &procglobal->freeProcs;
|
||||
procgloballist = &ProcGlobal->freeProcs;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Try to get a proc struct from the appropriate free list. If this
|
||||
|
@ -314,7 +312,7 @@ InitProcess(void)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
|
||||
set_spins_per_delay(procglobal->spins_per_delay);
|
||||
set_spins_per_delay(ProcGlobal->spins_per_delay);
|
||||
|
||||
MyProc = *procgloballist;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -578,13 +576,10 @@ InitAuxiliaryProcess(void)
|
|||
void
|
||||
PublishStartupProcessInformation(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */
|
||||
volatile PROC_HDR *procglobal = ProcGlobal;
|
||||
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
|
||||
procglobal->startupProc = MyProc;
|
||||
procglobal->startupProcPid = MyProcPid;
|
||||
ProcGlobal->startupProc = MyProc;
|
||||
ProcGlobal->startupProcPid = MyProcPid;
|
||||
|
||||
SpinLockRelease(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -627,12 +622,9 @@ HaveNFreeProcs(int n)
|
|||
{
|
||||
PGPROC *proc;
|
||||
|
||||
/* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */
|
||||
volatile PROC_HDR *procglobal = ProcGlobal;
|
||||
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
|
||||
proc = procglobal->freeProcs;
|
||||
proc = ProcGlobal->freeProcs;
|
||||
|
||||
while (n > 0 && proc != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -772,8 +764,6 @@ RemoveProcFromArray(int code, Datum arg)
|
|||
static void
|
||||
ProcKill(int code, Datum arg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */
|
||||
volatile PROC_HDR *procglobal = ProcGlobal;
|
||||
PGPROC *proc;
|
||||
PGPROC * volatile * procgloballist;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -822,7 +812,7 @@ ProcKill(int code, Datum arg)
|
|||
*procgloballist = proc;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Update shared estimate of spins_per_delay */
|
||||
procglobal->spins_per_delay = update_spins_per_delay(procglobal->spins_per_delay);
|
||||
ProcGlobal->spins_per_delay = update_spins_per_delay(ProcGlobal->spins_per_delay);
|
||||
|
||||
SpinLockRelease(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1644,9 +1634,6 @@ ProcSendSignal(int pid)
|
|||
|
||||
if (RecoveryInProgress())
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */
|
||||
volatile PROC_HDR *procglobal = ProcGlobal;
|
||||
|
||||
SpinLockAcquire(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -1657,8 +1644,8 @@ ProcSendSignal(int pid)
|
|||
* backend, so BackendPidGetProc() will not return any pid at all. So
|
||||
* we remember the information for this special case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pid == procglobal->startupProcPid)
|
||||
proc = procglobal->startupProc;
|
||||
if (pid == ProcGlobal->startupProcPid)
|
||||
proc = ProcGlobal->startupProc;
|
||||
|
||||
SpinLockRelease(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue