mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres
Add thread item.
This commit is contained in:
parent
593377f70c
commit
c23f380ff4
|
@ -1427,3 +1427,69 @@ TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
|
|||
|
||||
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
|
||||
|
||||
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M16320=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Thu Dec 6 10:16:20 2001
|
||||
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M16320=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org>
|
||||
Received: from west.navpoint.com (west.navpoint.com [207.106.42.13])
|
||||
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fB6FGJZ29347
|
||||
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:16:19 -0500 (EST)
|
||||
Received: from rs.postgresql.org (server1.pgsql.org [64.39.15.238] (may be forged))
|
||||
by west.navpoint.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fB6FGIE25797
|
||||
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:16:18 -0500 (EST)
|
||||
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
|
||||
by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB6F8MR55154
|
||||
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:12:12 -0600 (CST)
|
||||
(envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M16320=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org)
|
||||
Received: from dendrite.sacadia.com (adsl-64-168-22-137.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.168.22.137])
|
||||
by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fB3NNfm32380
|
||||
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:23:42 -0500 (EST)
|
||||
(envelope-from mkscott@sacadia.com)
|
||||
Received: from sacadia.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
||||
by dendrite.sacadia.com (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id fB3NKiK16816
|
||||
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:20:44 -0800 (PST)
|
||||
Message-ID: <3C0C08CC.917CC04B@sacadia.com>
|
||||
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 15:20:44 -0800
|
||||
From: mkscott@sacadia.com
|
||||
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
|
||||
X-Accept-Language: en
|
||||
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
||||
To: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
|
||||
Subject: [HACKERS] Using Threads (again)
|
||||
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
||||
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
||||
Precedence: bulk
|
||||
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
|
||||
Status: OR
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hi All,
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Since I last posted to this list I have done some work
|
||||
on a multi-threaded port of Postgres 7.0.2 that I have been kicking
|
||||
around for a while. There has been some mild interest
|
||||
in this in the past so I thought I might try and start a sourceforge
|
||||
project with what I have so far.
|
||||
|
||||
>From past discussions, it is clear to me that a direct port
|
||||
of postgres which uses threads instead of processes is not a
|
||||
good idea, how about an embedded version that uses threads.
|
||||
A multi-threaded postgres might be good for that.
|
||||
The version I am working on is slower in terms of transaction
|
||||
throughput than the current postgres but it uses less system
|
||||
resources and does not require shared memory.
|
||||
|
||||
I know it is possible to embed the current postgres but I
|
||||
believe that is a single user system.
|
||||
|
||||
Comments?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Myron Scott
|
||||
mkscott@sacadia.com
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
|
||||
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
|
||||
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
|
||||
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue