Remove STATUS_FOUND
Replace the solitary use with a bool. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a6f91ead-0ce4-2a34-062b-7ab9813ea308%402ndquadrant.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
38fc056074
commit
c096a804d9
@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
|
||||
ResourceOwner owner;
|
||||
uint32 hashcode;
|
||||
LWLock *partitionLock;
|
||||
int status;
|
||||
bool found_conflict;
|
||||
bool log_lock = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (lockmethodid <= 0 || lockmethodid >= lengthof(LockMethods))
|
||||
@ -979,12 +979,12 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
|
||||
* (That's last because most complex check.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (lockMethodTable->conflictTab[lockmode] & lock->waitMask)
|
||||
status = STATUS_FOUND;
|
||||
found_conflict = true;
|
||||
else
|
||||
status = LockCheckConflicts(lockMethodTable, lockmode,
|
||||
found_conflict = LockCheckConflicts(lockMethodTable, lockmode,
|
||||
lock, proclock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (status == STATUS_OK)
|
||||
if (!found_conflict)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* No conflict with held or previously requested locks */
|
||||
GrantLock(lock, proclock, lockmode);
|
||||
@ -992,8 +992,6 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert(status == STATUS_FOUND);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can't acquire the lock immediately. If caller specified no
|
||||
* blocking, remove useless table entries and return
|
||||
@ -1330,7 +1328,7 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
|
||||
* LockCheckConflicts -- test whether requested lock conflicts
|
||||
* with those already granted
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns STATUS_FOUND if conflict, STATUS_OK if no conflict.
|
||||
* Returns true if conflict, false if no conflict.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* NOTES:
|
||||
* Here's what makes this complicated: one process's locks don't
|
||||
@ -1340,7 +1338,7 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
|
||||
* the same group. So, we must subtract off these locks when determining
|
||||
* whether the requested new lock conflicts with those already held.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
bool
|
||||
LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
|
||||
LOCKMODE lockmode,
|
||||
LOCK *lock,
|
||||
@ -1367,7 +1365,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
|
||||
if (!(conflictMask & lock->grantMask))
|
||||
{
|
||||
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: no conflict", proclock);
|
||||
return STATUS_OK;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1393,7 +1391,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
|
||||
if (totalConflictsRemaining == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: resolved (simple)", proclock);
|
||||
return STATUS_OK;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If no group locking, it's definitely a conflict. */
|
||||
@ -1402,7 +1400,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
|
||||
Assert(proclock->tag.myProc == MyProc);
|
||||
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: conflicting (simple)",
|
||||
proclock);
|
||||
return STATUS_FOUND;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1439,7 +1437,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
|
||||
{
|
||||
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: resolved (group)",
|
||||
proclock);
|
||||
return STATUS_OK;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
otherproclock = (PROCLOCK *)
|
||||
@ -1449,7 +1447,7 @@ LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
|
||||
|
||||
/* Nope, it's a real conflict. */
|
||||
PROCLOCK_PRINT("LockCheckConflicts: conflicting (group)", proclock);
|
||||
return STATUS_FOUND;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -1149,10 +1149,8 @@ ProcSleep(LOCALLOCK *locallock, LockMethod lockMethodTable)
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* I must go before this waiter. Check special case. */
|
||||
if ((lockMethodTable->conflictTab[lockmode] & aheadRequests) == 0 &&
|
||||
LockCheckConflicts(lockMethodTable,
|
||||
lockmode,
|
||||
lock,
|
||||
proclock) == STATUS_OK)
|
||||
!LockCheckConflicts(lockMethodTable, lockmode, lock,
|
||||
proclock))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Skip the wait and just grant myself the lock. */
|
||||
GrantLock(lock, proclock, lockmode);
|
||||
@ -1648,10 +1646,8 @@ ProcLockWakeup(LockMethod lockMethodTable, LOCK *lock)
|
||||
* (b) doesn't conflict with already-held locks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((lockMethodTable->conflictTab[lockmode] & aheadRequests) == 0 &&
|
||||
LockCheckConflicts(lockMethodTable,
|
||||
lockmode,
|
||||
lock,
|
||||
proc->waitProcLock) == STATUS_OK)
|
||||
!LockCheckConflicts(lockMethodTable, lockmode, lock,
|
||||
proc->waitProcLock))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* OK to waken */
|
||||
GrantLock(lock, proc->waitProcLock, lockmode);
|
||||
|
@ -1120,7 +1120,6 @@ typedef union PGAlignedXLogBlock
|
||||
#define STATUS_OK (0)
|
||||
#define STATUS_ERROR (-1)
|
||||
#define STATUS_EOF (-2)
|
||||
#define STATUS_FOUND (1)
|
||||
#define STATUS_WAITING (2)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ extern VirtualTransactionId *GetLockConflicts(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
|
||||
LOCKMODE lockmode, int *countp);
|
||||
extern void AtPrepare_Locks(void);
|
||||
extern void PostPrepare_Locks(TransactionId xid);
|
||||
extern int LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
|
||||
extern bool LockCheckConflicts(LockMethod lockMethodTable,
|
||||
LOCKMODE lockmode,
|
||||
LOCK *lock, PROCLOCK *proclock);
|
||||
extern void GrantLock(LOCK *lock, PROCLOCK *proclock, LOCKMODE lockmode);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user