Defend against null scankeys in spgist searches.
Should've thought of that one earlier.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5577ca5bfb
commit
b7a0e8fb4d
@ -162,13 +162,22 @@ spgLeafTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, Datum leafDatum,
|
||||
oldCtx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(so->tempCxt);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < so->numberOfKeys; i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
in.strategy = so->keyData[i].sk_strategy;
|
||||
in.query = so->keyData[i].sk_argument;
|
||||
ScanKey skey = &so->keyData[i];
|
||||
|
||||
/* Assume SPGiST-indexable operators are strict */
|
||||
if (skey->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
result = false;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
in.strategy = skey->sk_strategy;
|
||||
in.query = skey->sk_argument;
|
||||
|
||||
out.recheck = false;
|
||||
|
||||
result = DatumGetBool(FunctionCall2Coll(&so->state.leafConsistentFn,
|
||||
so->keyData[i].sk_collation,
|
||||
skey->sk_collation,
|
||||
PointerGetDatum(&in),
|
||||
PointerGetDatum(&out)));
|
||||
*recheck |= out.recheck;
|
||||
@ -398,13 +407,22 @@ redirect:
|
||||
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < so->numberOfKeys; j++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
in.strategy = so->keyData[j].sk_strategy;
|
||||
in.query = so->keyData[j].sk_argument;
|
||||
ScanKey skey = &so->keyData[j];
|
||||
|
||||
/* Assume SPGiST-indexable operators are strict */
|
||||
if (skey->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
nMatches = 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
in.strategy = skey->sk_strategy;
|
||||
in.query = skey->sk_argument;
|
||||
|
||||
memset(&out, 0, sizeof(out));
|
||||
|
||||
FunctionCall2Coll(&so->state.innerConsistentFn,
|
||||
so->keyData[j].sk_collation,
|
||||
skey->sk_collation,
|
||||
PointerGetDatum(&in),
|
||||
PointerGetDatum(&out));
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user