mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres
Update count(*) discussion ideas:
< BY col {DESC} LIMIT 1. Completing this item involves making this > BY col {DESC} LIMIT 1. Completing this item involves doing this < invalidated if anyone modifies the table. < > invalidated if anyone modifies the table. Another idea is to > get a count directly from a unique index, but for this to be > faster than a sequential scan it must avoid access to the heap > to obtain tuple visibility information. > > * Allow data to be pulled directly from indexes > > Currently indexes do not have enough tuple tuple visibility > information to allow data to be pulled from the index without > also accessing the heap. One way to allow this is to set a bit > to index tuples to indicate if a tuple is currently visible to > all transactions when the first valid heap lookup happens. This > bit would have to be cleared when a heap tuple is expired. >
This commit is contained in:
parent
5df3fc67a7
commit
b60a8512a0
18
doc/TODO
18
doc/TODO
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
TODO list for PostgreSQL
|
||||
========================
|
||||
Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
|
||||
Last updated: Wed Jan 19 09:17:41 EST 2005
|
||||
Last updated: Sat Jan 22 15:05:08 EST 2005
|
||||
|
||||
The most recent version of this document can be viewed at the PostgreSQL web
|
||||
site, http://www.PostgreSQL.org.
|
||||
|
@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ Indexes
|
|||
* Use indexes for MIN() and MAX()
|
||||
|
||||
MIN/MAX queries can already be rewritten as SELECT col FROM tab ORDER
|
||||
BY col {DESC} LIMIT 1. Completing this item involves making this
|
||||
BY col {DESC} LIMIT 1. Completing this item involves doing this
|
||||
transformation automatically.
|
||||
|
||||
* Use index to restrict rows returned by multi-key index when used with
|
||||
|
@ -684,8 +684,20 @@ Cache
|
|||
|
||||
We could use a fixed row count and a +/- count to follow MVCC
|
||||
visibility rules, or a single cached value could be used and
|
||||
invalidated if anyone modifies the table.
|
||||
invalidated if anyone modifies the table. Another idea is to
|
||||
get a count directly from a unique index, but for this to be
|
||||
faster than a sequential scan it must avoid access to the heap
|
||||
to obtain tuple visibility information.
|
||||
|
||||
* Allow data to be pulled directly from indexes
|
||||
|
||||
Currently indexes do not have enough tuple tuple visibility
|
||||
information to allow data to be pulled from the index without
|
||||
also accessing the heap. One way to allow this is to set a bit
|
||||
to index tuples to indicate if a tuple is currently visible to
|
||||
all transactions when the first valid heap lookup happens. This
|
||||
bit would have to be cleared when a heap tuple is expired.
|
||||
|
||||
* Consider automatic caching of queries at various levels:
|
||||
o Parsed query tree
|
||||
o Query execute plan
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue