Fix broken Assert() introduced by 8e9a16ab8f7f0e58
Don't assert MultiXactIdIsRunning if the multi came from a tuple that had been share-locked and later copied over to the new cluster by pg_upgrade. Doing that causes an error to be raised unnecessarily: MultiXactIdIsRunning is not open to the possibility that its argument came from a pg_upgraded tuple, and all its other callers are already checking; but such multis cannot, obviously, have transactions still running, so the assert is pointless. Noticed while investigating the bogus pg_multixact/offsets/0000 file left over by pg_upgrade, as reported by Andres Freund in http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140530121631.GE25431@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch to 9.3, as the commit that introduced the buglet.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1147035203
commit
b277057648
@ -5518,8 +5518,14 @@ FreezeMultiXactId(MultiXactId multi, uint16 t_infomask,
|
||||
* was a locker only, it can be removed without any further
|
||||
* consideration; but if it contained an update, we might need to
|
||||
* preserve it.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Don't assert MultiXactIdIsRunning if the multi came from a
|
||||
* pg_upgrade'd share-locked tuple, though, as doing that causes an
|
||||
* error to be raised unnecessarily.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
Assert(!MultiXactIdIsRunning(multi));
|
||||
Assert((!(t_infomask & HEAP_LOCK_MASK) &&
|
||||
HEAP_XMAX_IS_LOCKED_ONLY(t_infomask)) ||
|
||||
!MultiXactIdIsRunning(multi));
|
||||
if (HEAP_XMAX_IS_LOCKED_ONLY(t_infomask))
|
||||
{
|
||||
*flags |= FRM_INVALIDATE_XMAX;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user