From a1fc50672c4b410f6a75db1efe807efeaccf571c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alvaro Herrera Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 19:31:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix an outdated and grammatically wrong comment Authored by Amit Langote and myself independently Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGCjcH0gG-=tM7hhP7TEDmzrHMHJbPGSHtHgFmx9mnFkg@mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c index 6239abae90..babf26810b 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c @@ -1517,9 +1517,9 @@ ldelete:; * for the caller. * * False is returned if the tuple we're trying to move is found to have been - * concurrently updated. In that case, the caller must to check if the - * updated tuple that's returned in *retry_slot still needs to be re-routed, - * and call this function again or perform a regular update accordingly. + * concurrently updated. In that case, the caller must check if the updated + * tuple (in updateCxt->cpUpdateRetrySlot) still needs to be re-routed, and + * call this function again or perform a regular update accordingly. */ static bool ExecCrossPartitionUpdate(ModifyTableContext *context,