Remove obsolete commentary.
Since we got rid of non-MVCC catalog scans, the fourth reason given for using a non-transactional update in index_update_stats() is obsolete. The other three are still good, so we're not going to change the code, but fix the comment.
This commit is contained in:
parent
18f158ef69
commit
a00d468e65
@ -1784,14 +1784,6 @@ index_update_stats(Relation rel,
|
||||
* trying to change the pg_class row to the same thing, so it doesn't
|
||||
* matter which goes first).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 4. Even with just a single CREATE INDEX, there's a risk factor because
|
||||
* someone else might be trying to open the rel while we commit, and this
|
||||
* creates a race condition as to whether he will see both or neither of
|
||||
* the pg_class row versions as valid. Again, a non-transactional update
|
||||
* avoids the risk. It is indeterminate which state of the row the other
|
||||
* process will see, but it doesn't matter (if he's only taking
|
||||
* AccessShareLock, then it's not critical that he see relhasindex true).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It is safe to use a non-transactional update even though our
|
||||
* transaction could still fail before committing. Setting relhasindex
|
||||
* true is safe even if there are no indexes (VACUUM will eventually fix
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user