Add a note about SystemTap vs DTrace spelling of probe names.
This commit is contained in:
parent
df858fe58a
commit
9d6469c9b2
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml,v 1.70 2009/06/17 21:58:49 tgl Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml,v 1.71 2009/06/26 22:08:17 tgl Exp $ -->
|
||||
|
||||
<chapter id="monitoring">
|
||||
<title>Monitoring Database Activity</title>
|
||||
@ -1568,6 +1568,17 @@ Commit 70
|
||||
Total time (ns) 2312105013
|
||||
</screen>
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<note>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
SystemTap uses a different notation for trace scripts than DTrace does,
|
||||
even though the underlying trace points are compatible. One point worth
|
||||
noting is that at this writing, SystemTap scripts must reference probe
|
||||
names using double underlines in place of hyphens. This is expected to
|
||||
be fixed in future SystemTap releases.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
You should remember that DTrace scripts need to be carefully written and
|
||||
debugged, otherwise the trace information collected might
|
||||
@ -1576,6 +1587,7 @@ Total time (ns) 2312105013
|
||||
discussing information found using dynamic tracing, be sure to enclose
|
||||
the script used to allow that too to be checked and discussed.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
More example scripts can be found in the PgFoundry
|
||||
<ulink url="http://pgfoundry.org/projects/dtrace/">dtrace project</ulink>.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user