Fix for vacuum updating problem.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5fbbd364e8
commit
9c4eceb4e3
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c,v 1.70 1998/08/19 02:01:56 momjian Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c,v 1.71 1998/08/19 15:47:35 momjian Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
|
||||
#include "storage/bufpage.h"
|
||||
#include "storage/shmem.h"
|
||||
#include "storage/smgr.h"
|
||||
#include "storage/itemptr.h"
|
||||
#include "storage/lmgr.h"
|
||||
#include "utils/builtins.h"
|
||||
#include "utils/inval.h"
|
||||
@ -1883,13 +1884,11 @@ vc_updstats(Oid relid, int npages, int ntups, bool hasindex, VRelStats *vacrelst
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* XXX -- after write, should invalidate relcache in other backends */
|
||||
#ifdef NOT_USED
|
||||
WriteNoReleaseBuffer(&rtup->t_ctid); /* heap_endscan release scan' buffers ? */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
WriteNoReleaseBuffer(ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(&rtup->t_ctid));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* invalidating system relations confuses the function cache of
|
||||
* pg_operator and pg_opclass
|
||||
* pg_operator and pg_opclass, bjm
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!IsSystemRelationName(pgcform->relname.data))
|
||||
RelationInvalidateHeapTuple(rd, rtup);
|
||||
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c,v 1.24 1998/08/19 02:02:02 momjian Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c,v 1.25 1998/08/19 15:47:36 momjian Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ IndexNext(IndexScan *node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool prev_matches = false;
|
||||
int prev_index;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* ----------------
|
||||
* store the scanned tuple in the scan tuple slot of
|
||||
* the scan state. Eventually we will only do this and not
|
||||
@ -142,10 +142,17 @@ IndexNext(IndexScan *node)
|
||||
slot, /* slot to store in */
|
||||
buffer, /* buffer associated with tuple */
|
||||
false); /* don't pfree */
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must check to see if the current tuple would have been
|
||||
* matched by an earlier index, so we don't double report it.
|
||||
* We do this by passing the tuple through ExecQual and look
|
||||
* for failure with all previous qualifications.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (prev_index = 0; prev_index < indexstate->iss_IndexPtr;
|
||||
prev_index++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
scanstate->cstate.cs_ExprContext->ecxt_scantuple = slot;
|
||||
if (ExecQual(nth(prev_index, node->indxqual),
|
||||
scanstate->cstate.cs_ExprContext))
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user